• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双诊断住院患者机械约束使用的流行率、预测因素和模式。

Prevalence, predictors, and patterns of mechanical restraint use for inpatients with dual diagnosis.

机构信息

Mental Health Center, St Hans Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.

Mental Health Center Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark.

出版信息

Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2020 Jan;56(1):20-27. doi: 10.1111/ppc.12367. Epub 2019 Mar 3.

DOI:10.1111/ppc.12367
PMID:30828824
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study examined the prevalence, predictors, and patterns of mechanical restraint in an inpatient dual diagnosis population.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Data were longitudinally collected from patients affected by severe mental illness and comorbid substance abuse that were hospitalized in three large wards from 2006 to 2012.

FINDINGS

In a sample of 1698 hospitalizations, the use of mechanical restraint ranged between 1% and 4% per year. The diagnosis of schizophrenia (odds ratio [OR], 2.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29-5.40), the use of stimulant substances (OR, 5.68; 95% CI, 2.78-11.59) and male sex (OR, 3.22; 95% CI, 1.12-9.27) were associated with an increased risk of being exposed to mechanical restraint.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Specialized interventions targeting people at risk of mechanical restraint may further reduce the incidence of restraint and improve treatment outcomes.

摘要

目的

本研究调查了住院双重诊断人群中机械约束的流行率、预测因素和模式。

设计与方法

数据是从 2006 年至 2012 年间在三家大型病房住院的患有严重精神疾病和合并物质滥用的患者中纵向收集的。

发现

在 1698 例住院患者中,每年使用机械约束的比例在 1%至 4%之间。精神分裂症的诊断(优势比[OR],2.64;95%置信区间[CI],1.29-5.40)、兴奋剂物质的使用(OR,5.68;95% CI,2.78-11.59)和男性(OR,3.22;95% CI,1.12-9.27)与接触机械约束的风险增加相关。

实践意义

针对有机械约束风险的人的专门干预措施可能会进一步降低约束的发生率并改善治疗结果。

相似文献

1
Prevalence, predictors, and patterns of mechanical restraint use for inpatients with dual diagnosis.双诊断住院患者机械约束使用的流行率、预测因素和模式。
Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2020 Jan;56(1):20-27. doi: 10.1111/ppc.12367. Epub 2019 Mar 3.
2
[Cognitive milieu therapy and restraint within dual diagnosis populations].
Ugeskr Laeger. 2008 Jan 28;170(5):339-43.
3
Dual diagnosis and mechanical restraint - a register based study of 31,793 patients and 6562 episodes of mechanical restraint in the Capital region of Denmark from 2010-2014.双重诊断与机械约束——一项基于丹麦首都地区2010 - 2014年31793名患者和6562次机械约束事件登记的研究。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2019 Apr;73(3):169-177. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2019.1582695. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
4
Coercion in psychiatry: the importance of extramural factors.精神病学中的强制手段:院外因素的重要性。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2016 Nov;70(8):606-10. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2016.1190401. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
5
[Dual diagnosis in psychiatric inpatients: prevalence and general characteristics].[精神科住院患者的双重诊断:患病率及一般特征]
Invest Clin. 2008 Jun;49(2):195-205.
6
Use of antipsychotics and benzodiazepines in connection to minimising coercion and mechanical restraint in a general psychiatric ward.抗精神病药和苯二氮䓬类药物在减少一般精神科病房中的强制和机械约束方面的应用。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2018 May;64(3):258-265. doi: 10.1177/0020764018760650. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
7
Effects of a Regulatory Protocol for Mechanical Restraint and Coercion in a Spanish Psychiatric Ward.西班牙一家精神病病房中机械约束与强制监管协议的效果
Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2015 Oct;51(4):260-7. doi: 10.1111/ppc.12090. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
8
Implementation of the safewards model to reduce the use of coercive measures in adult psychiatric inpatient units: An interrupted time-series analysis.实施安全保障模式以减少成年精神科住院患者强制性措施的使用:一项中断时间序列分析。
J Psychiatr Res. 2018 Oct;105:147-152. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.08.026. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
9
Use of mechanical and pharmacological restraint over an eight-year period and its relation to clinical factors.八年期间机械和药物约束的使用及其与临床因素的关系。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2018 Jan;72(1):24-30. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2017.1373854. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
10
Use of the least intrusive coercion at Danish psychiatric wards: A register-based cohort study of 131,632 first and subsequent coercive episodes within 35,812 admissions.丹麦精神病病房最低侵犯性强制手段的使用:在 35812 次入院中,对 131632 次首次和后续强制事件的基于登记的队列研究。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2022 Nov-Dec;85:101838. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2022.101838. Epub 2022 Oct 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Influencing factors of the implementation of mechanical restraint in open psychiatric ward: a retrospective study (2016-2021).开放式精神科病房实施机械约束的影响因素:一项回顾性研究(2016 - 2021年)
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 May 30;25(1):554. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06969-z.
2
Mechanical restraint in inpatient psychiatric settings: A systematic review of international prevalence, associations, outcomes, and reduction strategies.住院精神科环境中的机械约束:国际患病率、关联因素、结局及减少策略的系统评价
Eur Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 25;68(1):e57. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.2453.
3
Mechanical Restraint in Inpatient Psychiatric Unit: Prevalence and Associated Clinical Variables.
住院精神科病房中的机械约束:流行率及相关临床变量。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Oct 17;59(10):1847. doi: 10.3390/medicina59101847.
4
Family History of Psychiatric Disorders and Clinical Factors Associated With a Schizophrenia Diagnosis.精神障碍家族史与与精神分裂症诊断相关的临床因素。
Inquiry. 2021 Jan-Dec;58:469580211060797. doi: 10.1177/00469580211060797.
5
Overcoming the Use of Mechanical Restraints in Psychiatry: A New Challenge in the Everyday Clinical Practice at the Time of COVID-19.克服精神病学中机械约束的使用:COVID-19 时代日常临床实践中的新挑战。
J Clin Med. 2020 Nov 23;9(11):3774. doi: 10.3390/jcm9113774.