• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

擅长头颈部皮肤重建外科。

Expertise in Head and Neck Cutaneous Reconstructive Surgery.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia.

Department of Dermatology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.

出版信息

Dermatol Surg. 2019 Jun;45(6):782-790. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001844.

DOI:10.1097/DSS.0000000000001844
PMID:30829776
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The management of skin cancers has evolved with the development of Mohs micrographic surgery and a greater emphasis on surgical training within dermatology. It is unclear whether these changes have translated into innovations and contributions to the reconstructive literature.

OBJECTIVE

To assess contributions from each medical specialty to the cutaneous head and neck oncologic reconstructive literature.

METHODS

The authors conducted a systematic review of the head and neck reconstructive literature from 2000 through 2015 based on a priori search terms relating to suture technique, linear closure, advancement, rotation, transposition and interpolation flaps, and identified the specialty of the senior authors.

RESULTS

The authors identified 74,871 articles, of which 1,319 were relevant. Under suture technique articles, the senior authors were primarily dermatologists (58.2%) and plastic surgeons (20.3%). Under linear closure, the authors were dermatologists (48.1%), plastic surgeons (22.2%), and otolaryngologists (20.4%). Under advancement and rotation flaps, the senior authors were plastic surgeons (40.5%, 38.9%), dermatologists (38.1%, 34.2%), and otolaryngologists (14.4%, 21.6%). Under transposition and interpolation flaps, the senior authors were plastic surgeons (47.3%, 39.4%), dermatologists (32.3%, 27.0%), and otolaryngologists (15.3%, 23.4%).

CONCLUSION

The primary specialties contributing to the cutaneous head and neck reconstructive literature are plastic surgery, dermatology, and otolaryngology.

摘要

背景

随着 Mohs 显微外科手术的发展以及皮肤科内对手术培训的重视,皮肤癌的治疗方法已经发生了变化。目前尚不清楚这些变化是否已经转化为创新,并为重建文献做出了贡献。

目的

评估每个医学专业对皮肤头颈部肿瘤重建文献的贡献。

方法

作者根据与缝线技术、线性闭合、推进、旋转、转位和插入皮瓣相关的预先设定的检索词,对 2000 年至 2015 年的头颈部重建文献进行了系统评价,并确定了资深作者的专业。

结果

作者共识别出 74871 篇文章,其中 1319 篇是相关的。在缝线技术文章中,资深作者主要是皮肤科医生(58.2%)和整形外科医生(20.3%)。在线性闭合方面,作者是皮肤科医生(48.1%)、整形外科医生(22.2%)和耳鼻喉科医生(20.4%)。在推进和旋转皮瓣方面,资深作者是整形外科医生(40.5%、38.9%)、皮肤科医生(38.1%、34.2%)和耳鼻喉科医生(14.4%、21.6%)。在转位和插入皮瓣方面,资深作者是整形外科医生(47.3%、39.4%)、皮肤科医生(32.3%、27.0%)和耳鼻喉科医生(15.3%、23.4%)。

结论

对皮肤头颈部重建文献贡献最大的主要专业是整形外科、皮肤科和耳鼻喉科。

相似文献

1
Expertise in Head and Neck Cutaneous Reconstructive Surgery.擅长头颈部皮肤重建外科。
Dermatol Surg. 2019 Jun;45(6):782-790. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001844.
2
Dermatologists perform the majority of cutaneous reconstructions in the Medicare population: numbers and trends from 2004 to 2009.皮肤科医生在 Medicare 人群中进行了大多数的皮肤重建:2004 年至 2009 年的数量和趋势。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013 May;68(5):803-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2013.01.026. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
3
Periorbital reconstructive techniques following Mohs micrographic surgery or excisions: a systematic review.Mohs 显微外科手术或切除术治疗眶周缺损的重建技术:系统评价。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2023 Sep;315(7):1853-1861. doi: 10.1007/s00403-022-02523-z. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
4
Association between type of reconstruction after Mohs micrographic surgery and surgeon-, patient-, and tumor-specific features: a cross-sectional study.Mohs 显微外科术后重建类型与外科医生、患者和肿瘤特征的相关性:一项横断面研究。
Dermatol Surg. 2013 Jan;39(1 Pt 1):51-5. doi: 10.1111/dsu.12045. Epub 2012 Nov 30.
5
Mohs micrographic surgery.莫氏显微外科手术
Clin Privil White Pap. 2012 Jun(13):1-22.
6
Quantity and characteristics of flap or graft repairs for skin cancer on the nose or ears: a comparison between Mohs micrographic surgery and plastic surgery.鼻子或耳朵皮肤癌皮瓣或移植修复的数量及特征:莫氏显微外科手术与整形外科的比较
Cutis. 2019 May;103(5):284-287.
7
Mohs surgery in Australia: a survey of work practices.澳大利亚的 Mohs 手术:工作实践调查。
Australas J Dermatol. 2011 May;52(2):98-103. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-0960.2011.00751.x. Epub 2011 May 5.
8
Perceptions of expertise in cutaneous surgery and cosmetic procedures: what primary care physicians think.皮肤科手术和美容程序的专业认知:初级保健医生的看法。
Dermatol Surg. 2012 Oct;38(10):1645-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2012.02577.x. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
9
A Comparison of Free Tissue Transfers to the Head and Neck Performed by Sugeons and Otolaryngologists.外科医生和耳鼻喉科医生对头颈部进行游离组织移植的比较。
J Craniofac Surg. 2016 Jan;27(1):e82-5. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002240.
10
Do Patterns of Reconstruction Choices After Mohs Surgery Vary by Specialty? A Pilot Study of Mohs Surgeons and Facial Plastic Surgeons.莫氏手术(Mohs surgery)后的修复选择模式是否因专业不同而有所差异?一项针对莫氏外科医生和面部整形医生的初步研究。
Dermatol Surg. 2018 Nov;44(11):1396-1401. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001602.