Brown-Rytlewski D E, McManus P S
Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706.
Plant Dis. 2000 Aug;84(8):923. doi: 10.1094/PDIS.2000.84.8.923B.
In fall 1996, cankers were observed on branches of 7- to 9-year-old apple trees (Malus domestica cvs. Empire and McIntosh, strains Marshall and Redmax) in a research orchard in Sturgeon Bay, WI. By summer 1997, cankers had developed on scaffold limbs or the central leaders of 48 of 48 Marshall McIntosh trees and 26 of 40 Redmax McIntosh trees, but they rarely were found in an adjacent block of 40 Empire trees. In 1998, new cankers were not observed, but existing cankers expanded. By 1999, the Marshall McIntosh block was so severely affected it was removed; 50% of the Redmax trees and 13% of the Empire trees also were removed. Initially, cankers appeared as orange discolored areas on bark and frequently, but not always, were associated with pruning wounds. Canker expansion was greater during spring and fall than during summer. At later stages of canker development, bark cracked and peeled, and leaves distal to cankers died. These features were consistent with descriptions of Leucostoma canker of apple (2,3), a disease previously reported only in Michigan, Germany, and Iran (1-3). All of 10 cankers sampled in 1997 and several more cankers sampled in 1998 yielded fungal colonies on potato-dextrose agar resembling Leucocytospora spp., which are anamorphs of Leucostoma spp. (2). Colonies initially were white to buff and later turned brown. Conidium morphology was consistent with descriptions of Leucocytospora spp. (2). Alternaria spp. also were isolated frequently; other fungi, which were not identified, were isolated rarely. The presence of abundant pycnidia of Leuco-cytospora, but not perithecia of Leucostoma, on cankers was different from the signs described for Leucostoma canker caused by Leucostoma cincta in Michigan (2,3). However, simple matching coefficient analysis of randomly amplified polymorphic DNA data indicated 74% similarity between a typical isolate from apple in Wisconsin (97-82) and two isolates of L. cincta from apple in Michigan (3; ATCC 64878 and 64879) but only 49 to 54% similarity to L. cincta and L. persoonii isolated from stone fruit trees (Prunus spp.). Inoculation of wounded branches of mature apple trees (cvs. Golden Delicious and Cortland) with isolate 97-82 in July 1998 and 1999 resulted in cankers that resembled young cankers observed on trees in the research orchard. Eight weeks after inoculation, the pathogen was reisolated from these cankers, which fulfilled Koch's Postulates. Therefore, we conclude that Leucostoma canker was responsible for the serious damage to apple trees of different cultivars at the research station, with strains of McIntosh affected most severely. We speculate that low-temperature injury during the unusually cold winter of 1995-1996 might have created infection sites and predisposed trees to disease development. This is the first report of Leucostoma canker of apple in Wisconsin. It is rare that this disease causes such significant losses (2). References: (1) M. Ashkan. Iranian J. Plant Pathol. 30:33, 1994. (2) A. L. Jones and H. S. Aldwinckle, eds. 1991. Pages 40-41 in: Compendium of Apple and Pear Diseases. American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MN. (3) T. J. Proffer and A. L. Jones. Plant Dis. 73:508, 1989.
1996年秋,在威斯康星州斯特金湾的一个科研果园里,7至9年生苹果树(苹果品种帝国和麦金托什,品系马歇尔和瑞德马克斯)的枝条上发现了溃疡病斑。到1997年夏,48株马歇尔麦金托什苹果树中的48株以及40株瑞德马克斯麦金托什苹果树中的26株的主枝或中央领导干上都出现了溃疡病斑,但在相邻的40株帝国苹果树中很少发现。1998年,未观察到新的溃疡病斑,但现有病斑有所扩展。到1999年,马歇尔麦金托什苹果树地块受到严重影响,被移除;50%的瑞德马克斯苹果树和13%的帝国苹果树也被移除。最初,溃疡病斑在树皮上表现为橙色变色区域,且通常(但并非总是)与修剪伤口有关。溃疡病斑在春季和秋季的扩展比夏季更大。在溃疡病发展的后期,树皮开裂并剥落,病斑远端的叶片枯死。这些特征与苹果白纹羽溃疡病的描述一致(2,3),该病此前仅在密歇根州、德国和伊朗有报道(1 - 3)。1997年采集的10个溃疡病斑样本以及1998年采集的更多病斑样本,在马铃薯葡萄糖琼脂培养基上均长出了类似白纹羽菌属的真菌菌落,白纹羽菌属是白纹羽壳菌属的无性型(2)。菌落最初为白色至浅黄色,后来变为褐色。分生孢子形态与白纹羽菌属的描述一致(2)。链格孢属真菌也经常被分离到;其他未鉴定的真菌则很少被分离到。溃疡病斑上有大量的白纹羽壳菌分生孢子器,但没有白纹羽壳菌的子囊壳,这与密歇根州由白纹羽壳菌引起的白纹羽溃疡病的症状描述不同(2,3)。然而,随机扩增多态性DNA数据的简单匹配系数分析表明,来自威斯康星州苹果的一个典型分离株(97 - 82)与来自密歇根州苹果的两个白纹羽壳菌分离株(3;ATCC 64878和64879)的相似度为74%,但与从核果类树木(李属)分离的白纹羽壳菌和佩氏白纹羽壳菌的相似度仅为49%至54%。1998年7月和1999年,用分离株97 - 82接种成熟苹果树(品种金冠和科特兰)的受伤枝条,导致出现的溃疡病斑类似于科研果园中树木上观察到的幼龄病斑。接种8周后,从这些溃疡病斑中重新分离出病原菌,这满足了柯赫氏法则。因此,我们得出结论,白纹羽溃疡病是造成该科研站不同品种苹果树严重损害的原因,其中麦金托什品系受影响最严重。我们推测,1995 - 1996年异常寒冷的冬季期间的低温伤害可能造成了感染位点,并使树木易染病。这是威斯康星州苹果白纹羽溃疡病的首次报道。这种病害很少造成如此重大的损失(2)。参考文献:(1)M. Ashkan. Iranian J. Plant Pathol. 30:33, 1994.(2)A. L. Jones和H. S. Aldwinckle,编著。1991年。载于:《苹果和梨病害汇编》。美国植物病理学会,明尼苏达州圣保罗。第40 - 41页。(3)T. J. Proffer和A. L. Jones. Plant Dis. 73:508, 1989.