• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国亚裔男性鼻咽癌筛查的成本效益分析。

Cost-effectiveness of Screening for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma among Asian American Men in the United States.

机构信息

1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.

2 School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.

出版信息

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Jul;161(1):82-90. doi: 10.1177/0194599819832593. Epub 2019 Mar 5.

DOI:10.1177/0194599819832593
PMID:30832545
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Most patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in the United States are diagnosed with stage III-IV disease. Screening for NPC in endemic areas results in earlier detection and improved outcomes. We examined the cost-effectiveness of screening for NPC with plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA among Asian American men in the United States.

STUDY DESIGN

We used a Markov cohort model to estimate discounted life-years, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for screening as compared with usual care without screening.

SETTING

The base case analysis considered onetime screening for 50-year-old Asian American men.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Confirmatory testing was magnetic resonance imaging and nasopharyngoscopy. Cancer-specific outcomes, health utility values, and costs were determined from cancer registries and the published literature.

RESULTS

For Asian American men, usual care without screening resulted in the detection of NPC at stages I, II, III-IVB, and IVC among 6%, 29%, 54%, and 11% of those with cancer, respectively, whereas screening resulted in earlier detection with a stage distribution of 43%, 24%, 32%, and 1%. This corresponded to an additional 0.00055 QALYs gained at a cost of $63 per person: an incremental cost of $113,341 per QALY gained. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, screening Asian American men was cost-effective at $100,000 per QALY gained in 35% of samples.

CONCLUSION

Although screening for NPC with plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA for 50-year-old Asian American men may result in earlier detection, in this study it was unlikely to be cost-effective. Screening may be reasonable for certain subpopulations at higher risk for NPC, but clinical studies are necessary before implementation.

摘要

目的

大多数美国的鼻咽癌(NPC)患者被诊断为 III-IV 期疾病。在鼻咽癌高发地区进行筛查可更早发现疾病,改善预后。我们研究了对美国亚裔男性进行血浆 Epstein-Barr 病毒 DNA 筛查 NPC 的成本效益。

研究设计

我们使用马尔可夫队列模型,估算了筛查与不筛查的常规治疗相比,筛查为亚裔美国男性带来的折扣生命年、质量调整生命年(QALY)、成本和增量成本效益比。

设定

基础分析考虑对 50 岁的亚裔美国男性进行一次性筛查。

受试者和方法

确认性检测为磁共振成像和鼻咽镜检查。癌症特异性结局、健康效用值和成本来自癌症登记处和已发表的文献。

结果

对于亚裔美国男性,不筛查的常规治疗分别导致 I 期、II 期、III-IVB 期和 IVC 期 NPC 在有癌症患者中的检出率为 6%、29%、54%和 11%,而筛查导致更早检出,分期分布为 43%、24%、32%和 1%。这对应于每人多获得 0.00055 个 QALY,成本为每人 63 美元:增量成本为每获得一个 QALY 增加 113341 美元。在概率敏感性分析中,在 35%的样本中,对 50 岁的亚裔美国男性进行 NPC 筛查的成本效益为每 QALY 增加 10 万美元。

结论

虽然对 50 岁的亚裔美国男性进行血浆 Epstein-Barr 病毒 DNA 筛查可能会更早发现 NPC,但在本研究中,这种筛查不太可能具有成本效益。对于某些 NPC 风险较高的亚人群,筛查可能是合理的,但在实施之前需要进行临床研究。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of Screening for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma among Asian American Men in the United States.美国亚裔男性鼻咽癌筛查的成本效益分析。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Jul;161(1):82-90. doi: 10.1177/0194599819832593. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
2
[Cost-effectiveness evaluation of seven screening strategies for nasopharyngeal carcinoma].[七种鼻咽癌筛查策略的成本效益评估]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2012 Jul;34(7):549-53. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2012.07.015.
3
Cost-Effectiveness of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Screening With Epstein-Barr Virus Polymerase Chain Reaction or Serology in High-Incidence Populations Worldwide.鼻咽癌筛查中应用 Epstein-Barr 病毒聚合酶链反应或血清学检测的成本效果评价:全球高发地区人群研究
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Jul 1;113(7):852-862. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa198.
4
Liquid biopsy posttreatment surveillance in endemic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a cost-effective strategy to integrate circulating cell-free Epstein-Barr virus DNA.地方性鼻咽癌治疗后液体活检监测:整合循环游离 Epstein-Barr 病毒 DNA 的一种具有成本效益的策略。
BMC Med. 2021 Aug 26;19(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-02076-4.
5
Cost-effectiveness of screening and vaccinating Asian and Pacific Islander adults for hepatitis B.对亚太岛民成年人进行乙型肝炎筛查和疫苗接种的成本效益分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 2;147(7):460-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-7-200710020-00004.
6
Cost-effectiveness of Population-Wide Genomic Screening for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer in the United States.美国人群遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌基因筛查的成本效益分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2022874. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.22874.
7
Cost-effectiveness of screening for anal squamous intraepithelial lesions and anal cancer in human immunodeficiency virus-negative homosexual and bisexual men.在人类免疫缺陷病毒阴性的男同性恋者和双性恋男性中筛查肛门鳞状上皮内病变和肛门癌的成本效益
Am J Med. 2000 Jun 1;108(8):634-41. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00349-1.
8
Optimization and Local Cost-Effectiveness of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Screening Strategies in Southern China: Secondary Analysis of the Guangdong Randomized Trial.中国南方鼻咽癌筛查策略的优化和局部成本效益:广东省随机试验的二次分析。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2024 Jul 1;33(7):884-895. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-1486.
9
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with nedaplatin versus cisplatin in stage II-IVB nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A cost-effectiveness analysis.同期放化疗联合奈达铂与顺铂治疗ⅡB-IVB 期鼻咽癌的成本效果分析。
Oral Oncol. 2019 Jun;93:15-20. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.04.003. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
10
The cost-effectiveness of screening for type 2 diabetes. CDC Diabetes Cost-Effectiveness Study Group, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.2型糖尿病筛查的成本效益。美国疾病控制与预防中心糖尿病成本效益研究小组
JAMA. 1998 Nov 25;280(20):1757-63.

引用本文的文献

1
Health Economic Evaluations of Circulating Tumor DNA Testing for Cancer Screening: Systematic Review.用于癌症筛查的循环肿瘤DNA检测的卫生经济学评估:系统评价
Cancer Med. 2025 Feb;14(3):e70641. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70641.
2
Polygenic risk-stratified screening for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in high-risk endemic areas of China: a cost-effectiveness study.基于多基因风险评分的中国鼻咽癌高发地区鼻咽癌筛查:成本效益研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 May 2;12:1375533. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1375533. eCollection 2024.
3
Toripalimab plus chemotherapy in American patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A cost-effectiveness analysis.
特瑞普利单抗联合化疗治疗美国复发性或转移性鼻咽癌患者的成本效果分析。
Cancer Med. 2024 May;13(10):e7243. doi: 10.1002/cam4.7243.
4
Epidemiology of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: current insights and future outlook.鼻咽癌的流行病学:当前的认识和未来展望。
Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2024 Sep;43(3):919-939. doi: 10.1007/s10555-024-10176-9. Epub 2024 Mar 2.
5
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. A "different" head and neck tumour. Part A: from histology to staging.鼻咽癌。一种“独特的”头颈部肿瘤。A部分:从组织学到分期
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2023 Apr;43(2):85-98. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-N2222.
6
Mortality-to-Incidence Ratio for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Is Associated with Health Expenditure.鼻咽癌的死亡率与发病率之比与卫生支出有关。
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Aug 25;10(9):1615. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10091615.
7
Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy With or Without Induction Chemotherapy for Patients with Stage II Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: An Update.II期鼻咽癌患者同步放化疗联合或不联合诱导化疗:最新进展
Transl Oncol. 2020 Jan;13(1):25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2019.08.007. Epub 2019 Nov 16.