• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单纯的教育干预以及与端口保护器联合使用,可降低呼吸半重症监护病房中心静脉导管感染和定植的发生率。

Educational interventions alone and combined with port protector reduce the rate of central venous catheter infection and colonization in respiratory semi-intensive care unit.

机构信息

UOC Pneumologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

UOC Malattie Infettive, Fondazione Polcilinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Mar 4;19(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-3848-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12879-019-3848-z
PMID:30832598
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6398260/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Central Line-Associated BloodStream Infections (CLABSIs) are emerging challenge in Respiratory semi-Intensive Care Units (RICUs). We evaluated efficacy of educational interventions on rate of CLABSIs and effects of port protector as adjuvant tool.

METHODS

Study lasted 18 months (9 months of observation and 9 of intervention). We enrolled patients with central venous catheter (CVC): 1) placed during hospitalization in RICU; 2) already placed without signs of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) within 48 h after the admission; 3) already placed without evidence of microbiologic contamination of blood cultures. During interventional period we randomized patients into two groups: 1) educational intervention (Group 1) and 2) educational intervention plus port protector (Group 2). We focused on CVC-related sepsis as primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were the rate of CVC colonization and CVC contamination.

RESULTS

Eighty seven CVCs were included during observational period. CLABSIs rate was 8.4/1000 [10 sepsis (9 CLABSIs)]. We observed 17 CVC colonizations and 6 contaminations. Forty six CVCs were included during interventional period. CLABSIs rate was 1.4/1000. 21/46 CVCs were included into Group 2, in which no CLABSIs or contaminations were reported, while 2 CVC colonizations were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study clearly shows that both kinds of interventions significantly reduce the rate of CLABSIs. In particular, the use of port protector combined to educational interventions gave zero CLABSIs rate.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03486093 [ ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier], retrospectively registered.

摘要

背景

中心静脉导管相关性血流感染(CLABSIs)是呼吸半重症监护病房(RICUs)面临的新挑战。我们评估了教育干预对 CLABSIs 发生率的影响,以及端口保护器作为辅助工具的效果。

方法

研究持续了 18 个月(观察期 9 个月,干预期 9 个月)。我们纳入了中央静脉导管(CVC)患者:1)在 RICU 住院期间放置;2)在入院后 48 小时内已放置且无全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)迹象;3)已放置且血培养无微生物污染证据。在干预期间,我们将患者随机分为两组:1)教育干预组(第 1 组)和 2)教育干预加端口保护器组(第 2 组)。我们将 CVC 相关性败血症作为主要结局。次要结局为 CVC 定植和 CVC 污染的发生率。

结果

在观察期内纳入了 87 根 CVC。CLABSIs 发生率为 8.4/1000[10 例败血症(9 例 CLABSIs)]。我们观察到 17 例 CVC 定植和 6 例污染。在干预期内纳入了 46 根 CVC。CLABSIs 发生率为 1.4/1000。第 2 组中有 21 根 CVC,无 CLABSIs 或污染报告,而有 2 例 CVC 定植。

结论

我们的研究清楚地表明,这两种干预措施均显著降低了 CLABSIs 的发生率。特别是,使用端口保护器结合教育干预可使 CLABSIs 发生率降为零。

试验注册

NCT03486093[ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符],回顾性注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75a4/6398260/dcafc0a602e8/12879_2019_3848_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75a4/6398260/0a56a47fb696/12879_2019_3848_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75a4/6398260/276cf047f31a/12879_2019_3848_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75a4/6398260/dcafc0a602e8/12879_2019_3848_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75a4/6398260/0a56a47fb696/12879_2019_3848_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75a4/6398260/276cf047f31a/12879_2019_3848_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75a4/6398260/dcafc0a602e8/12879_2019_3848_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Educational interventions alone and combined with port protector reduce the rate of central venous catheter infection and colonization in respiratory semi-intensive care unit.单纯的教育干预以及与端口保护器联合使用,可降低呼吸半重症监护病房中心静脉导管感染和定植的发生率。
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Mar 4;19(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-3848-z.
2
Emergency Department Central Line-associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSI) Incidence in the Era of Prevention Practices.预防措施时代急诊科中心静脉导管相关血流感染(CLABSI)的发生率
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Sep;22(9):1048-55. doi: 10.1111/acem.12744.
3
Effectiveness of Minocycline and Rifampin vs Chlorhexidine and Silver Sulfadiazine-Impregnated Central Venous Catheters in Preventing Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection in a High-Volume Academic Intensive Care Unit: A Before and after Trial.米诺环素和利福平与洗必泰及磺胺嘧啶银浸渍中央静脉导管在预防高容量学术性重症监护病房中心导管相关血流感染中的效果:一项前后对照试验。
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Sep;221(3):739-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.05.013. Epub 2015 May 27.
4
Central venous catheter contamination rate in suspected sepsis patients: an observational clinical study.疑似脓毒症患者中心静脉导管污染率:一项观察性临床研究。
J Hosp Infect. 2023 May;135:98-105. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2023.02.015. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
5
Novel approach using antimicrobial catheters to improve the management of central line-associated bloodstream infections in cancer patients.采用抗菌导管的新方法改善癌症患者中心静脉相关血流感染的管理。
Cancer. 2011 Jun 1;117(11):2551-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25807. Epub 2010 Dec 14.
6
Central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection and colonization: the impact of insertion site and distribution of multidrug-resistant pathogens.中心静脉导管相关性血流感染和定植:置管部位和多药耐药病原体分布的影响。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2020 Dec 1;9(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s13756-020-00851-1.
7
Central-Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSIs) Incidence and the Role of Obesity: A Prospective, Observational Study in Greece.中心静脉导管相关性血流感染(CLABSI)的发病率与肥胖的关系:希腊的一项前瞻性、观察性研究。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1196:11-18. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-32637-1_2.
8
Epidemiology of central line-associated bloodstream infections in Quebec intensive care units: a 6-year review.魁北克省重症监护病房中心静脉相关血流感染的流行病学:6 年回顾。
Am J Infect Control. 2012 Apr;40(3):221-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.04.008. Epub 2011 Aug 6.
9
Cessation of In-line Filters in Central Venous Catheters Does Not Significantly Influence the Incidence of Bloodstream Infections and Mortality in a Hospital Hematological Ward.中心静脉导管中去除 inline 过滤器对医院血液科病房血流感染发生率和死亡率无显著影响。
Intern Med. 2016;55(10):1287-92. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.55.6207. Epub 2016 May 15.
10
Reducing the rate of catheter-associated bloodstream infections in a surgical intensive care unit using the Institute for Healthcare Improvement Central Line Bundle.采用美国医疗机构改进协会的中心静脉导管套件降低外科重症监护病房的导管相关血流感染发生率。
Am J Surg. 2014 Jun;207(6):817-23. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.08.041. Epub 2014 Jan 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving critical care nurses' knowledge of central venous catheter management through education.通过教育提高重症护理护士对中心静脉导管管理的知识水平。
Health SA. 2025 Jul 9;30:2966. doi: 10.4102/hsag.v30i0.2966. eCollection 2025.
2
Medical Device-Associated Biofilm Infections and Multidrug-Resistant Pathogens.医疗器械相关生物膜感染与多重耐药病原体
Pathogens. 2024 May 8;13(5):393. doi: 10.3390/pathogens13050393.
3
In vitro assessment of isopropanol leakage from antiseptic barrier caps into commonly used needleless connectors.

本文引用的文献

1
Continuous passive disinfection of catheter hubs prevents contamination and bloodstream infection.连续被动消毒可防止导管接头污染和血流感染。
Am J Infect Control. 2013 Jan;41(1):33-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.05.030. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
2
Impact of alcohol-impregnated port protectors and needleless neutral pressure connectors on central line-associated bloodstream infections and contamination of blood cultures in an inpatient oncology unit.酒精浸渍式端口保护器和无针中性压力连接器对住院肿瘤科中心静脉相关血流感染和血培养污染的影响。
Am J Infect Control. 2012 Dec;40(10):931-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.01.025. Epub 2012 May 9.
3
体外评估异丙醇从消毒剂阻隔帽漏入常用无针连接器的情况。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2024 May;45(5):576-582. doi: 10.1017/ice.2023.285. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
4
Disinfectant caps effectiveness.消毒帽的有效性。
Infez Med. 2023 Dec 1;31(4):553-559. doi: 10.53854/liim-3104-14. eCollection 2023.
5
Advances in Medical Nutrition Therapy: Parenteral Nutrition.医学营养治疗进展:肠外营养。
Nutrients. 2020 Mar 8;12(3):717. doi: 10.3390/nu12030717.
Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections.
血管内导管相关感染预防指南。
Am J Infect Control. 2011 May;39(4 Suppl 1):S1-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.01.003.
4
Estimating the proportion of healthcare-associated infections that are reasonably preventable and the related mortality and costs.估算合理可预防的医疗保健相关感染的比例,以及相关的死亡率和成本。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011 Feb;32(2):101-14. doi: 10.1086/657912.
5
Non-invasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure.急性呼吸衰竭中的无创通气
Lancet. 2009 Jul 18;374(9685):250-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60496-7.
6
Patients with respiratory failure increase ambulation after transfer to an intensive care unit where early activity is a priority.呼吸衰竭患者在转至以早期活动为优先事项的重症监护病房后,活动量会增加。
Crit Care Med. 2008 Apr;36(4):1119-24. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318168f986.
7
Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in the acute care setting: where are we?急性护理环境中的无创正压通气:我们目前的状况如何?
Eur Respir J. 2008 Apr;31(4):874-86. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00143507.
8
Daily cost of antimicrobial therapy in patients with Intensive Care Unit-acquired, laboratory-confirmed bloodstream infection.重症监护病房获得性、实验室确诊血流感染患者抗菌治疗的每日费用。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2008 Feb;31(2):161-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2007.10.015.
9
Estimating health care-associated infections and deaths in U.S. hospitals, 2002.2002年美国医院医疗保健相关感染及死亡情况的估算
Public Health Rep. 2007 Mar-Apr;122(2):160-6. doi: 10.1177/003335490712200205.
10
An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU.一项降低重症监护病房导管相关血流感染的干预措施。
N Engl J Med. 2006 Dec 28;355(26):2725-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa061115.