UOC Pneumologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
UOC Malattie Infettive, Fondazione Polcilinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Mar 4;19(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-3848-z.
Central Line-Associated BloodStream Infections (CLABSIs) are emerging challenge in Respiratory semi-Intensive Care Units (RICUs). We evaluated efficacy of educational interventions on rate of CLABSIs and effects of port protector as adjuvant tool.
Study lasted 18 months (9 months of observation and 9 of intervention). We enrolled patients with central venous catheter (CVC): 1) placed during hospitalization in RICU; 2) already placed without signs of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) within 48 h after the admission; 3) already placed without evidence of microbiologic contamination of blood cultures. During interventional period we randomized patients into two groups: 1) educational intervention (Group 1) and 2) educational intervention plus port protector (Group 2). We focused on CVC-related sepsis as primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were the rate of CVC colonization and CVC contamination.
Eighty seven CVCs were included during observational period. CLABSIs rate was 8.4/1000 [10 sepsis (9 CLABSIs)]. We observed 17 CVC colonizations and 6 contaminations. Forty six CVCs were included during interventional period. CLABSIs rate was 1.4/1000. 21/46 CVCs were included into Group 2, in which no CLABSIs or contaminations were reported, while 2 CVC colonizations were found.
Our study clearly shows that both kinds of interventions significantly reduce the rate of CLABSIs. In particular, the use of port protector combined to educational interventions gave zero CLABSIs rate.
NCT03486093 [ ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier], retrospectively registered.
中心静脉导管相关性血流感染(CLABSIs)是呼吸半重症监护病房(RICUs)面临的新挑战。我们评估了教育干预对 CLABSIs 发生率的影响,以及端口保护器作为辅助工具的效果。
研究持续了 18 个月(观察期 9 个月,干预期 9 个月)。我们纳入了中央静脉导管(CVC)患者:1)在 RICU 住院期间放置;2)在入院后 48 小时内已放置且无全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)迹象;3)已放置且血培养无微生物污染证据。在干预期间,我们将患者随机分为两组:1)教育干预组(第 1 组)和 2)教育干预加端口保护器组(第 2 组)。我们将 CVC 相关性败血症作为主要结局。次要结局为 CVC 定植和 CVC 污染的发生率。
在观察期内纳入了 87 根 CVC。CLABSIs 发生率为 8.4/1000[10 例败血症(9 例 CLABSIs)]。我们观察到 17 例 CVC 定植和 6 例污染。在干预期内纳入了 46 根 CVC。CLABSIs 发生率为 1.4/1000。第 2 组中有 21 根 CVC,无 CLABSIs 或污染报告,而有 2 例 CVC 定植。
我们的研究清楚地表明,这两种干预措施均显著降低了 CLABSIs 的发生率。特别是,使用端口保护器结合教育干预可使 CLABSIs 发生率降为零。
NCT03486093[ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符],回顾性注册。