Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Women and Health Initiative, Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Women and Health Initiative, Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
J Adolesc Health. 2019 Jun;64(6):737-745. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.11.018. Epub 2019 Mar 2.
Existing literature calls for a deeper examination into how local context influences adolescent sexual and reproductive health outcomes. We seek to describe individual and contextual variation in early adolescent childbearing (younger than 16 years) in 44 low- and middle-income countries by (1) examining the role of individual-level social disadvantage, (2) exploring the ecological influence of context at the country and community level, and (3) assessing whether ecological effects vary according to a woman's wealth.
We used nationally representative data from 33,822 communities in 44 low- and middle-income countries. We employed multilevel modeling to examine the variation in early adolescent childbearing apportioned to the individual, community, and country levels.
Globally, poverty and low educational attainment are associated with early adolescent childbearing. After accounting for individual-level characteristics, significant residual variance remains at both the community and country levels. Routine, individual-level covariates explain 46.4% of the total variance at the community level and 21.3% of the total variance at the country level in relation to the baseline, age-adjusted model. The variance apportioned to the community level is estimated to equal 43.5% (95% confidence interval: .40, .49) of the total variance among the poorest women compared with 32.6% (95% confidence interval: .25, .39) among the richest women. Across countries, we find substantial heterogeneity in the variance observed at the community level.
Our results point to the need for a continued focus on multilevel interventions that include approaches to target both the individual and population levels. More research is needed to identify the mechanisms through which local context influences adolescent sexual and reproductive health outcomes.
现有文献呼吁更深入地研究地方环境如何影响青少年的性健康和生殖健康结果。我们试图通过以下方式描述 44 个低收入和中等收入国家中青少年早育(16 岁以下)的个体和环境差异:(1)检验个体社会劣势的作用;(2)探索国家和社区层面的环境生态影响;(3)评估生态效应是否因妇女的财富而异。
我们使用了来自 44 个低收入和中等收入国家 33822 个社区的全国代表性数据。我们采用多水平模型来检验早育的个体、社区和国家层面的差异。
全球范围内,贫困和教育程度低与青少年早育有关。在考虑个体水平特征后,社区和国家层面仍存在显著的剩余方差。常规的个体水平协变量解释了社区层面总方差的 46.4%(95%置信区间:.40,.49)和国家层面总方差的 21.3%(95%置信区间:.25,.39),与基础的年龄调整模型相比。与最富有的妇女相比,在最贫困的妇女中,社区层面分配的方差估计为总方差的 43.5%(95%置信区间:.40,.49),而最富有的妇女为 32.6%(95%置信区间:.25,.39)。在各国之间,我们发现社区层面观察到的方差存在很大的异质性。
我们的结果表明,需要继续关注多层次干预措施,包括针对个人和人群层面的方法。需要进一步研究以确定地方环境影响青少年性健康和生殖健康结果的机制。