De Vecchis Renato, Soreca Silvia, Ariano Carmelina
Preventive Cardiology and Rehabilitation Unit, DSB 29 "S. Gennaro dei Poveri Hospital", via S.Gennaro dei Poveri 25, 80136 Napoli, Italy.
Cardiol Res. 2019 Feb;10(1):24-33. doi: 10.14740/cr813. Epub 2019 Feb 24.
For elderly patients suffering from arterial hypertension, a complete assessment of the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan used as an anti-hypertensive agent is not available yet. Therefore, we decided to perform a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to explore some endpoints concerning anti-hypertensive efficacy as well as safety of sacubitril/valsartan in elderly hypertensive patients.
PubMed and Scopus have been extensively investigated with the help of some key words until June 15, 2018. The meta-analysis incorporated exclusively RCTs in which the anti-hypertensive efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan were compared with those of a reference drug (comparator) that could be an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi), an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), a calcium channel blocker (CCB) or a beta-blocker. Continuous ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was required as an inclusion criterion in the studies to be included in the meta-analysis. The mean reductions in systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure in the sitting position (msSBP and msDBP, respectively), as well as the mean reductions in ambulatory systolic blood pressure (maSBP) and ambulatory diastolic blood pressure (maDBP), were assumed as efficacy endpoints. Adverse events (AEs) were taken as safety outcomes.
Five RCTs were included with a total of 1,513 patients for analysis. In all studies, the comparator drug was an ARB (valsartan in two cases and olmesartan in the remaining three cases). Compared with ARBs, after 12 weeks there was a significant reduction in msSBP (weight mean difference (WMD) = - 5.41 mm Hg, 95% confidence interval (CI): -7.0 to -3.8; P < 0.01), msDBP (WMD = -1.22 mm Hg, 95% CI : -2.15 to -0.3; P < 0.01), maSBP (WMD = -4.58 mm Hg, 95% CI: -5.62 to -3.54; P < 0.01) and maDBP (WMD = -2.17 mm Hg, 95% CI: - 2.78 to -1.56; P < 0.01) in elderly hypertensive patients at 12 weeks.
Sacubitril/valsartan may reduce arterial pressure more efficaciously than ARBs in elderly hypertensive patients. These results have to be confirmed by further RCTs with a good methodological quality, possibly with a greater sample size.
对于患有动脉高血压的老年患者,目前尚无关于沙库巴曲缬沙坦作为抗高血压药物的疗效和安全性的完整评估。因此,我们决定进行一项随机对照试验(RCT)的荟萃分析,以探讨沙库巴曲缬沙坦在老年高血压患者中的抗高血压疗效及安全性的一些终点指标。
截至2018年6月15日,借助一些关键词对PubMed和Scopus进行了广泛检索。该荟萃分析仅纳入了将沙库巴曲缬沙坦的抗高血压疗效和安全性与作为对照药物(比较剂)的血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEi)、血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)、钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)或β受体阻滞剂进行比较的RCT。持续动态血压监测被要求作为纳入荟萃分析的研究的纳入标准。坐位收缩压和舒张压的平均降低值(分别为msSBP和msDBP)以及动态收缩压(maSBP)和动态舒张压(maDBP)的平均降低值被视为疗效终点。不良事件(AE)被作为安全性结局。
纳入了5项RCT,共1513例患者进行分析。在所有研究中,对照药物均为ARB(2例为缬沙坦,其余3例为奥美沙坦)。与ARB相比,12周后老年高血压患者的msSBP(加权均数差(WMD)=-5.41 mmHg,95%置信区间(CI):-7.0至-3.8;P<0.01)、msDBP(WMD=-1.22 mmHg,95%CI:-2.15至-0.3;P<0.01)、maSBP(WMD=-4.58 mmHg,95%CI:-5.62至-3.54;P<0.01)和maDBP(WMD=-2.17 mmHg,95%CI:-2.78至-1.56;P<0.01)均有显著降低。
在老年高血压患者中,沙库巴曲缬沙坦可能比ARB更有效地降低动脉压。这些结果必须通过方法学质量良好、可能样本量更大的进一步RCT来证实。