• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

'Do no harm': an intuitive decision tool to assess the need for gastrointestinal endoscopy.

作者信息

Sonnenberg Amnon, Pohl Heiko

机构信息

Gastroenterology Section, Portland VA Medical Center.

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States.

出版信息

Endosc Int Open. 2019 Mar;7(3):E384-E388. doi: 10.1055/a-0826-4432. Epub 2019 Feb 28.

DOI:10.1055/a-0826-4432
PMID:30834299
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6395093/
Abstract
摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75df/6395093/5fc3cc605a6f/10-1055-a-0826-4432-i1395ei2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75df/6395093/f0a74e306d7f/10-1055-a-0826-4432-i1395ei1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75df/6395093/5fc3cc605a6f/10-1055-a-0826-4432-i1395ei2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75df/6395093/f0a74e306d7f/10-1055-a-0826-4432-i1395ei1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75df/6395093/5fc3cc605a6f/10-1055-a-0826-4432-i1395ei2.jpg

相似文献

1
'Do no harm': an intuitive decision tool to assess the need for gastrointestinal endoscopy.“不伤害原则”：一种评估胃肠内镜检查需求的直观决策工具。
Endosc Int Open. 2019 Mar;7(3):E384-E388. doi: 10.1055/a-0826-4432. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
2
[Construction and evaluation of the epidemiological injury criteria based on the combination of 'Hurt' and 'Harm'].基于“伤害”与“损害”相结合的流行病学损伤标准构建与评价
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2016 Feb;36(2):269-72.
3
Joy to the world! A (healthy) child is born! Reconceptualizing 'harm' in wrongful conception.
Soc Leg Stud. 2004;13(1):5-26. doi: 10.1177/0964663904040190.
4
From psychiatric symptom to diagnostic category: self-harm from the Victorians to DSM-5.从精神症状到诊断类别：从维多利亚时代到《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版的自我伤害
Hist Psychiatry. 2013 Jun;24(2):148-65. doi: 10.1177/0957154X13478082.
5
Colonoscopy in the very elderly.老年人结肠镜检查。
Br Med Bull. 2018 Sep 1;127(1):33-41. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldy018.
6
Identifying 'avoidable harm' in family practice: a RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method consensus study.识别家庭医疗中的“可避免伤害”：一项 RAND/UCLA 适宜性方法共识研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Oct 4;20(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-0990-z.
7
Harm reduction coming of age: A summary of the '18th International Conference on the Reduction of Drug Related Harm'-Warsaw, Poland: 13-17 May 2007.减少伤害走向成熟：“第18届减少毒品相关伤害国际会议”总结——波兰华沙：2007年5月13日至17日
Int J Drug Policy. 2007 Dec;18(6):503-8. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2007.10.002.
8
The harms of promoting 'Zero Harm'.推行“零伤害”的危害。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Jan;29(1):4-6. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009703. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
9
Defining a 'unit of harm'.
Clin Radiol. 1989 Mar;40(2):219. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(89)80104-7.
10
From 'Do No Harm' to 'Do Maximal Good': an evolving concept.
Eur Heart J. 2020 Sep 7;41(34):3217-3218. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa406.

引用本文的文献

1
Biases in bioethics: a narrative review.生物伦理学中的偏见：叙事性综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Mar 6;24(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00894-0.
2
Willful ignorance in decision making against or in favor of endoscopy.在支持或反对内镜检查的决策中故意忽视相关信息。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2020 Feb;8(1):5-8. doi: 10.1177/2050640619897833. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
3
Failure of cost-benefit analysis in gastrointestinal endoscopy.胃肠内镜检查中成本效益分析的失败。

本文引用的文献

1
Cost Effectiveness of Age-Specific Screening Intervals for People With Family Histories of Colorectal Cancer.结直肠癌家族史人群特定年龄筛查间隔的成本效益
Gastroenterology. 2018 Jan;154(1):105-116.e20. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.09.021. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
2
Overuse of Repeat Upper Endoscopy in the Veterans Health Administration: A Retrospective Analysis.退伍军人健康管理局重复上消化道内镜检查的过度使用：一项回顾性分析。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Nov;112(11):1678-1685. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.192. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
3
How to Perform High-Quality Endoscopic Mucosal Resection During Colonoscopy.
Endosc Int Open. 2019 Nov;7(11):E1537-E1539. doi: 10.1055/a-0990-9583. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
如何在结肠镜检查期间进行高质量的内镜黏膜切除术
Gastroenterology. 2017 Feb;152(3):466-471. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.12.029. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
4
Management of Suspected Choledocholithiasis: A Decision Analysis for Choosing the Optimal Imaging Modality.疑似胆总管结石的管理：选择最佳成像方式的决策分析
Dig Dis Sci. 2016 Feb;61(2):603-9. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3882-7. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
5
Gastric adenocarcinoma screening and prevention in the era of new biomarker and endoscopic technologies: a cost-effectiveness analysis.新生物标志物和内镜技术时代的胃腺癌筛查与预防：一项成本效益分析
Gut. 2016 Apr;65(4):563-74. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308588. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
6
Repeated upper endoscopy in the Medicare population: a retrospective analysis.医疗保险人群中重复进行上消化道内镜检查：回顾性分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Feb 4;160(3):154. doi: 10.7326/M13-0046.
7
The appropriateness of colonoscopies at a teaching hospital: magnitude, associated factors, and comparison of EPAGE and EPAGE-II criteria.教学医院结肠镜检查的适宜性：程度、相关因素及 EPAGE 和 EPAGE-II 标准的比较。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jan;75(1):138-45. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.08.039. Epub 2011 Nov 17.
8
A nine-year audit of open-access upper gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: results and experience of a single centre.一项为期九年的开放获取上消化道内镜手术审计：单中心的结果与经验。
Can J Gastroenterol. 2011 Feb;25(2):83-8. doi: 10.1155/2011/379014.
9
Endoscopic versus surgical therapy for early cancer in Barrett's esophagus: a decision analysis.内镜治疗与手术治疗 Barrett 食管早期癌的决策分析
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Oct;70(4):623-31. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.11.047. Epub 2009 Apr 25.
10
Appropriateness of upper-GI endoscopy: an Italian survey on behalf of the Italian Society of Digestive Endoscopy.上消化道内镜检查的适宜性：一项代表意大利消化内镜学会开展的意大利调查。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 May;65(6):767-74. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.12.058.