Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy.
Comprehensive Heart Failure Center, University Clinic Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Intern Emerg Med. 2019 Oct;14(7):1083-1090. doi: 10.1007/s11739-019-02060-0. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
Guidelines recommend angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) for treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), but these medications are underprescribed in clinical practice. We reviewed the records of HF patients receiving a first visit in a tertiary outpatient clinic from January 1st 2004 to May 31st 2015, and selected those with a serum creatinine concentration (sCr) available at both the first and last visit and < 3.5 mg/dL at baseline, and a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50% at the first visit. Of 570 eligible patients, 92 (16.1%) never received ACEi/ARB. Compared to ACEi/ARB users, never-users were older, more often women, had higher sCr and lower systolic blood pressure, were less commonly on beta-blocker, and had more frequently anemia. Current or prior cancer also tended to be more common in ACEi/ARB never-users. ACEi/ARB users displayed an improvement in LVEF by ≥ 10% of the baseline value more often than ACEi/ARB never-users (33.7% vs. 20.7%, respectively, P = 0.01), whereas no difference in percent variation of sCr levels was found between the two groups (8.2% vs. 3.1%, respectively; P = 0.13). Over a median follow-up of 56 months (range 1-137 months), 215 (37.7%) patients died. After multiple adjustments, ACEi/ARB never-use was associated with an almost twofold increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR 1.97, 95%CI 1.39-2.80). ACEi/ARB underuse in HFrEF is a standing issue with dramatic prognostic consequences. Efforts are needed to eliminate perceived contraindications to these drugs and ensure their implementation in real-life cardiology.
指南推荐血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEi)和血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂(ARB)用于治疗射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF),但这些药物在临床实践中使用不足。我们回顾了 2004 年 1 月 1 日至 2015 年 5 月 31 日在三级门诊就诊的 HF 患者的病历,选择了那些在首次和末次就诊时均有血清肌酐浓度(sCr)记录且基线时 sCr<3.5mg/dL、且首次就诊时左心室射血分数(LVEF)<50%的患者。在 570 名合格患者中,有 92 名(16.1%)从未接受 ACEi/ARB 治疗。与 ACEi/ARB 使用者相比,从未使用者年龄更大,更多为女性,sCr 更高,收缩压更低,β受体阻滞剂的使用率更低,贫血更为常见。ACEi/ARB 从未使用者当前或既往癌症也更为常见。ACEi/ARB 使用者的 LVEF 较基线值增加≥10%的比例高于 ACEi/ARB 从未使用者(分别为 33.7%和 20.7%,P=0.01),而两组 sCr 水平变化百分比无差异(分别为 8.2%和 3.1%,P=0.13)。在中位随访 56 个月(范围 1-137 个月)期间,有 215 名(37.7%)患者死亡。经过多次调整后,ACEi/ARB 从未使用者的全因死亡率风险几乎增加了两倍(HR 1.97,95%CI 1.39-2.80)。HFrEF 中 ACEi/ARB 使用率不足是一个严重的问题,具有显著的预后后果。需要努力消除对这些药物的认知禁忌,并确保在现实生活中的心脏病学中使用这些药物。