Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Guri, South Korea.
Division of Cardiology/Cardiovascular Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang-si, South Korea.
Adv Ther. 2020 Sep;37(9):3839-3849. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01443-6. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
Use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) only, beta-blockers (BB) only, or both has been rarely compared in patients with heart failure (HF). We evaluated the prescribing patterns of ACEi/ARB and BB on prognosis in HF according to left ventricular function.
Study data were obtained from a national multicenter cohort that included patients hospitalized for HF. Patients were classified into four groups according to the prescription pattern at discharge: all ACEi/ARB and BB treatment group, only ACEi or ARB treatment group, only BB treatment group, and neither ACEi/ARB nor BB group.
Use of both ACEi/ARB and BB had significantly lowest all-cause death rates among the four groups in all types of HF. Cox regression analysis showed that use of both drugs was independently associated with 51% reduced risk of all-cause death in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and HF with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF). Treatment with only ACEi/ARB also showed an independent association with a 52% reduction in this group. However, only BB treatment was not associated with reducing long-term mortality in patients with HFpEF and HFmrEF. In patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction, use of ACEi/ARB and/or BB revealed an independent association with a reduced risk of all-cause death regardless of prescribing patterns.
Prescribing patterns were diverse in HF and there was a difference in the degree of risk reduction in all-cause death. In particular, clinicians should consider ACEi/ARB first for patients with HFpEF and HFmrEF prior to BB.
在心力衰竭(HF)患者中,很少比较使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEi)/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)、仅使用β受体阻滞剂(BB)或两者联合使用的效果。我们根据左心室功能评估了 HF 患者中 ACEi/ARB 和 BB 处方模式对预后的影响。
研究数据来自一个全国多中心队列,该队列包括因 HF 住院的患者。根据出院时的处方模式,患者被分为四组:所有 ACEi/ARB 和 BB 治疗组、仅 ACEi 或 ARB 治疗组、仅 BB 治疗组和既无 ACEi/ARB 也无 BB 组。
在所有类型的 HF 中,使用 ACEi/ARB 和 BB 的两组全因死亡率最低。Cox 回归分析显示,在射血分数保留性心力衰竭(HFpEF)和射血分数中间范围心力衰竭(HFmrEF)患者中,使用两种药物与全因死亡风险降低 51%独立相关。仅使用 ACEi/ARB 治疗也与该组降低 52%的风险独立相关。然而,仅 BB 治疗与 HFpEF 和 HFmrEF 患者的长期死亡率降低无关。在射血分数降低的 HF 患者中,无论处方模式如何,使用 ACEi/ARB 和/或 BB 均与全因死亡风险降低独立相关。
HF 的处方模式多种多样,全因死亡风险降低程度也存在差异。特别是,对于 HFpEF 和 HFmrEF 患者,临床医生应首先考虑使用 ACEi/ARB,然后再考虑 BB。