Suppr超能文献

肾素-血管紧张素系统阻滞剂和β受体阻滞剂的开具模式对心力衰竭预后的影响。

Effect of Prescribing Patterns of Renin-Angiotensin System Blockers and Beta-Blockers on Prognosis of Heart Failure.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Guri, South Korea.

Division of Cardiology/Cardiovascular Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang-si, South Korea.

出版信息

Adv Ther. 2020 Sep;37(9):3839-3849. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01443-6. Epub 2020 Jul 16.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) only, beta-blockers (BB) only, or both has been rarely compared in patients with heart failure (HF). We evaluated the prescribing patterns of ACEi/ARB and BB on prognosis in HF according to left ventricular function.

METHODS

Study data were obtained from a national multicenter cohort that included patients hospitalized for HF. Patients were classified into four groups according to the prescription pattern at discharge: all ACEi/ARB and BB treatment group, only ACEi or ARB treatment group, only BB treatment group, and neither ACEi/ARB nor BB group.

RESULTS

Use of both ACEi/ARB and BB had significantly lowest all-cause death rates among the four groups in all types of HF. Cox regression analysis showed that use of both drugs was independently associated with 51% reduced risk of all-cause death in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and HF with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF). Treatment with only ACEi/ARB also showed an independent association with a 52% reduction in this group. However, only BB treatment was not associated with reducing long-term mortality in patients with HFpEF and HFmrEF. In patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction, use of ACEi/ARB and/or BB revealed an independent association with a reduced risk of all-cause death regardless of prescribing patterns.

CONCLUSIONS

Prescribing patterns were diverse in HF and there was a difference in the degree of risk reduction in all-cause death. In particular, clinicians should consider ACEi/ARB first for patients with HFpEF and HFmrEF prior to BB.

摘要

简介

在心力衰竭(HF)患者中,很少比较使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEi)/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)、仅使用β受体阻滞剂(BB)或两者联合使用的效果。我们根据左心室功能评估了 HF 患者中 ACEi/ARB 和 BB 处方模式对预后的影响。

方法

研究数据来自一个全国多中心队列,该队列包括因 HF 住院的患者。根据出院时的处方模式,患者被分为四组:所有 ACEi/ARB 和 BB 治疗组、仅 ACEi 或 ARB 治疗组、仅 BB 治疗组和既无 ACEi/ARB 也无 BB 组。

结果

在所有类型的 HF 中,使用 ACEi/ARB 和 BB 的两组全因死亡率最低。Cox 回归分析显示,在射血分数保留性心力衰竭(HFpEF)和射血分数中间范围心力衰竭(HFmrEF)患者中,使用两种药物与全因死亡风险降低 51%独立相关。仅使用 ACEi/ARB 治疗也与该组降低 52%的风险独立相关。然而,仅 BB 治疗与 HFpEF 和 HFmrEF 患者的长期死亡率降低无关。在射血分数降低的 HF 患者中,无论处方模式如何,使用 ACEi/ARB 和/或 BB 均与全因死亡风险降低独立相关。

结论

HF 的处方模式多种多样,全因死亡风险降低程度也存在差异。特别是,对于 HFpEF 和 HFmrEF 患者,临床医生应首先考虑使用 ACEi/ARB,然后再考虑 BB。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验