Comparative Outcomes Group, Bristol, UK.
Medical Affairs, Hexal AG, Holzkirchen, Germany.
Future Oncol. 2019 May;15(13):1525-1533. doi: 10.2217/fon-2018-0762. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
The recombinant G-CSF filgrastim was first approved in 1991, and its value has been evolving ever since. Initial health technology assessments suggested low value due to high drug cost and no evidence for significant gain in overall survival. However, more recent meta-analyses of placebo-controlled randomized trial data show falling costs due to biosimilar competition and absolute overall survival gains of 3.2% (95% CI: 2.1-4.2%) from filgrastim support of cytotoxic chemotherapy. The launch of biosimilar alternatives merits a re-evaluation of decisions by health technology assessments and explains the first inclusion of filgrastim in the WHO Essential Drug List for cancer >20 years after its original approval in 1991, thus demonstrating the power of biosimilar medicines in transforming healthcare.
重组 G-CSF 非格司亭于 1991 年首次获得批准,此后其价值一直在不断发展。最初的卫生技术评估因药物成本高且无总生存获益的证据而表明其价值较低。然而,最近对安慰剂对照随机试验数据的荟萃分析显示,由于生物类似药的竞争,成本下降,并且非格司亭支持细胞毒性化疗的绝对总生存获益为 3.2%(95%CI:2.1-4.2%)。生物类似药替代品的推出促使对卫生技术评估做出重新评估,并解释了自 1991 年最初批准以来,非格司亭在世界卫生组织基本药物清单中首次被列入癌症治疗药物,这表明生物类似药在改变医疗保健方面的强大力量。