Division of Newborn Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
Telemed J E Health. 2020 Feb;26(2):176-183. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2018.0262. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of premature infant treatment managed by hybrid telemedicine versus conventional care. Prospective, noninferiority study comparing outcomes of premature infants at Comanche County Memorial Hospital's (CCMH) Level II neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) with outcomes at OU Medical Center's (OUMC) Level IV NICU. All 32-35 weeks gestational age (GA) infants admitted between May 2015 and October 2017 were included. Infants requiring mechanical ventilation >24 h or advanced subspecialty care were excluded. Outcome variables were: length of stay (LOS), respiratory support, and time to full per oral (PO) feeds. Parents at both centers were surveyed about their satisfaction with the care provided. Between-group comparisons were performed by using Chi-square or Fisher's exact test. LOS was assessed for normality by using the Shapiro-Wilk test, and robust regression was used to construct a multivariable regression model to test the independent effect of location on LOS. All analyses were performed by using SAS v. 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Data from 85 CCMH and 70 OUMC neonates were analyzed. CCMH neonates had significantly shorter LOS, reached full PO feeds sooner, and had fewer noninvasive ventilation support days. Location had a significant independent effect (p = 0.001) on LOS while controlling for GA, gender, race, surfactant use, inborn/outborn status, and 5-min APGAR scores. CCMH patients had reduced LOS of 3.01 days (95% confidence interval 1.1-4.8) than OUMC patients. Eighty-five surveys at CCMH and 66 at OUMC were analyzed. Compared with CCMH, OUMC parents reported more travel distance difficulties. 92.5% reported telemedicine experience as good or excellent, whereas 1.5% reported it as poor. Hybrid telemedicine is a safe and effective way to extend intensive neonatal care to medically underserved areas. Parental satisfaction with use of hybrid telemedicine is high and comparable to conventional care.
评估由混合远程医疗管理的早产儿治疗的安全性和疗效,与传统护理相比。这是一项前瞻性非劣效性研究,比较了 2015 年 5 月至 2017 年 10 月期间在科曼奇县纪念医院(CCMH)二级新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)和俄克拉荷马大学医疗中心(OUMC)四级 NICU 接受治疗的早产儿的结局。所有胎龄(GA)为 32-35 周的婴儿均被纳入研究。排除需要机械通气>24 小时或需要高级亚专科治疗的婴儿。结局变量包括:住院时间(LOS)、呼吸支持和全口服(PO)喂养时间。对两个中心的家长进行了关于他们对所提供护理满意度的调查。使用卡方检验或 Fisher 确切检验进行组间比较。通过 Shapiro-Wilk 检验评估 LOS 的正态性,并使用稳健回归构建多变量回归模型,以检验位置对 LOS 的独立影响。所有分析均使用 SAS v.9.3(SAS Institute,Cary,NC)进行。分析了 85 名 CCMH 和 70 名 OUMC 新生儿的数据。CCMH 新生儿的 LOS 明显更短,更早达到全 PO 喂养,无创通气支持天数更少。位置对 LOS 有显著的独立影响(p=0.001),同时控制了 GA、性别、种族、表面活性剂使用、出生地点、5 分钟 APGAR 评分。与 OUMC 患者相比,CCMH 患者的 LOS 缩短了 3.01 天(95%置信区间 1.1-4.8)。对 CCMH 进行了 85 次调查,对 OUMC 进行了 66 次调查。与 CCMH 相比,OUMC 家长报告说旅行困难更多。92.5%的家长表示远程医疗体验良好或优秀,而 1.5%的家长表示体验不佳。混合远程医疗是将强化新生儿护理扩展到医疗资源不足地区的一种安全有效的方法。家长对混合远程医疗的使用满意度很高,与传统护理相当。