Suppr超能文献

行为干预策略对 2 型糖尿病患者体力活动和久坐行为持续改变的影响:IDES_2 随机临床试验。

Effect of a Behavioral Intervention Strategy on Sustained Change in Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: The IDES_2 Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, ''La Sapienza'' University, Rome, Italy.

Diabetes Unit, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

JAMA. 2019 Mar 5;321(9):880-890. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.0922.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

There is no definitive evidence that changes in physical activity/sedentary behavior can be maintained long term in individuals with type 2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether a behavioral intervention strategy can produce a sustained increase in physical activity and reduction in sedentary time among individuals with type 2 diabetes.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Italian Diabetes and Exercise Study 2 was an open-label, assessor-blinded, randomized clinical superiority trial, with recruitment from October 2012 to February 2014 and follow-up until February 2017. In 3 outpatient diabetes clinics in Rome, 300 physically inactive and sedentary patients with type 2 diabetes were randomized 1:1 (stratified by center, age, and diabetes treatment) to receive a behavioral intervention or standard care for 3 years.

INTERVENTIONS

All participants received usual care targeted to meet American Diabetes Association guideline recommendations. Participants in the behavioral intervention group (n = 150) received 1 individual theoretical counseling session and 8 individual biweekly theoretical and practical counseling sessions each year. Participants in the standard care group (n = 150) received only general physician recommendations.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Co-primary end points were sustained change in physical activity volume, time spent in light-intensity and moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity, and sedentary time, measured by an accelerometer.

RESULTS

Of the 300 randomized participants (mean [SD] age, 61.6 [8.5] years; 116 women [38.7%]), 267 completed the study (133 in the behavioral intervention group and 134 in the standard care group). Median follow-up was 3.0 years. Participants in the behavioral intervention and standard care groups accumulated, respectively, 13.8 vs 10.5 metabolic equivalent-h/wk of physical activity volume (difference, 3.3 [95% CI, 2.2-4.4]; P < .001), 18.9 vs 12.5 min/dof moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity (difference, 6.4 [95% CI, 5.0-7.8]; P < .001), 4.6 vs 3.8 h/d of light-intensity physical activity (difference, 0.8 [95% CI, 0.5-1.1]; P < .001), and 10.9 vs 11.7 h/d of sedentary time (difference, -0.8 [95% CI, -1.0 to -0.5]; P < .001). Significant between-group differences were maintained throughout the study, but the between-group difference in moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity decreased during the third year from 6.5 to 3.6 min/d. There were 41 adverse events in the behavioral intervention group and 59 in the standard care group outside of the sessions; participants in the behavioral intervention group experienced 30 adverse events during the sessions (most commonly musculoskeletal injury/discomfort and mild hypoglycemia).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among patients with type 2 diabetes at 3 diabetes clinics in Rome who were followed up for 3 years, a behavioral intervention strategy compared with standard care resulted in a sustained increase in physical activity and decrease in sedentary time. Further research is needed to assess the generalizability of these findings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01600937.

摘要

重要性:目前尚无确凿证据表明,2 型糖尿病患者的体力活动/久坐行为的改变可以长期维持。

目的:研究行为干预策略是否能在 2 型糖尿病患者中持续增加体力活动和减少久坐时间。

设计、地点和参与者:意大利糖尿病与运动研究 2 是一项开放性、评估者盲法、随机临床优势试验,于 2012 年 10 月至 2014 年 2 月招募,随访至 2017 年 2 月。在罗马的 3 家门诊糖尿病诊所,招募了 300 名不活跃且久坐的 2 型糖尿病患者,按中心、年龄和糖尿病治疗进行 1:1 分层,随机分为接受行为干预或标准护理 3 年的两组。

干预措施:所有参与者均接受旨在符合美国糖尿病协会指南建议的常规护理。行为干预组(n=150)的参与者接受 1 次个体理论咨询和每年 8 次个体理论和实践咨询。标准护理组(n=150)的参与者仅接受一般医生的建议。

主要终点和测量:主要终点是通过加速度计测量的体力活动量、轻强度和中高强度体力活动时间和久坐时间的持续变化。

结果:在 300 名随机参与者中(平均[标准差]年龄 61.6[8.5]岁;116 名女性[38.7%]),267 名参与者完成了研究(行为干预组 133 名,标准护理组 134 名)。中位随访时间为 3.0 年。行为干预组和标准护理组的参与者分别积累了 13.8 和 10.5 代谢当量-h/wk 的体力活动量(差值为 3.3[95%CI,2.2-4.4];P<0.001),18.9 和 12.5 min/d 的中高强度体力活动(差值为 6.4[95%CI,5.0-7.8];P<0.001),4.6 和 3.8 h/d 的低强度体力活动(差值为 0.8[95%CI,0.5-1.1];P<0.001),以及 10.9 和 11.7 h/d 的久坐时间(差值为-0.8[95%CI,-1.0 至-0.5];P<0.001)。整个研究过程中均观察到显著的组间差异,但在第三年,中高强度体力活动的组间差异从 6.5 减少到 3.6 min/d。行为干预组有 41 例不良事件,标准护理组有 59 例不良事件,这些不良事件均发生在咨询室外;行为干预组的参与者在咨询期间经历了 30 例不良事件(最常见的是肌肉骨骼损伤/不适和轻度低血糖)。

结论和相关性:在罗马 3 家糖尿病诊所接受 3 年随访的 2 型糖尿病患者中,与标准护理相比,行为干预策略可持续增加体力活动和减少久坐时间。需要进一步研究来评估这些发现的普遍性。

试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT01600937。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验