Suppr超能文献

主治急诊医师对基于计划的工作场所评估系统的看法:麦克马斯特模块评估计划(McMAP)。

Attending Emergency Physicians' Perceptions of a Programmatic Workplace-Based Assessment System: The McMaster Modular Assessment Program (McMAP).

机构信息

a Department of Psychology, Neuroscience & Behaviour and Office of Education Science, Department of Surgery, McMaster University , Hamilton , Ontario , Canada.

b Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto and The Hospital for Sick Children , Toronto , Ontario , Canada.

出版信息

Teach Learn Med. 2019 Aug-Sep;31(4):434-444. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2019.1574581. Epub 2019 Mar 5.

Abstract

The McMaster Modular Assessment Program (McMAP) is a programmatic workplace-based assessment (WBA) system that provides emergency medicine trainees with competency judgments through frequent task-specific and global daily assessments. The longevity of McMAP relative to other programmatic WBA systems affords a unique view that precedes large-scale transitions to competency-based medical education (CBME), particularly in North America. Although prior work has described the perspective of residents using this system, the in-depth experiences of assessors using the system have yet to be explored. This perspective is important for understanding the validity of the competency judgments the system produces. We conducted a qualitative study that used semi-structured interviews analyzed using interpretive description (Thorne) to explore 16 attending physicians' experiences using McMAP. Data analysis was completed independently by 2 researchers, who met regularly to discuss codes and resolve any disagreements. Having a structured assessment framework for a range of clinical tasks has helped encourage what attendings perceived to be more frequent and better-quality assessments, with the added advantages of being holistic, flexible, and learner-driven. However, attendings also perceived a number of challenges of McMAP and programmatic WBA more broadly. These included a reluctance to give and to document negative feedback, "gaming" of the system by both attendings and residents, and a variety of logistic and technology-related concerns. Based on our findings, we offer several key recommendations that can help programs maximize the benefits of programmatic WBA as they transition to CBME.

摘要

麦克马斯特模块化评估计划(McMAP)是一个计划性的基于工作场所的评估(WBA)系统,通过频繁的特定任务和全球日常评估为急诊医学受训者提供能力判断。与其他计划性 WBA 系统相比,McMAP 的存在时间相对较长,这为向基于能力的医学教育(CBME)的大规模过渡提供了独特的视角,特别是在北美。尽管之前的工作已经描述了使用该系统的住院医师的观点,但评估者使用该系统的深入经验尚未得到探索。了解系统产生的能力判断的有效性,这一观点非常重要。我们进行了一项定性研究,使用半结构化访谈,采用解释性描述(Thorne)进行分析,以探讨 16 名主治医生使用 McMAP 的经验。两名研究人员独立完成数据分析,他们定期开会讨论代码并解决任何分歧。拥有一系列临床任务的结构化评估框架有助于鼓励评估者进行更频繁和更高质量的评估,其额外的优势在于全面、灵活和以学习者为导向。然而,主治医生也认为 McMAP 和更广泛的计划性 WBA 存在一些挑战。这些挑战包括不愿意提供和记录负面反馈、主治医生和住院医师对系统的“操纵”,以及各种后勤和技术相关的问题。根据我们的发现,我们提出了一些关键建议,可以帮助计划在向 CBME 过渡时最大限度地发挥计划性 WBA 的优势。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验