Horn S D, Horn R A, Moses H
Am J Public Health. 1986 May;76(5):532-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.76.5.532.
We report on a study that examined physician practice profiles using two methods of patient classification: the Severity of Illness Index and diagnosis-related groups (DRGs). When used together with conventional management information and DRGs, the Severity of Illness Index permitted useful comparisons to be made among physicians; differences in both case-mix and severity could be estimated. In 37 per cent of the physicians studied, we found differences of more than $10,000 in the apparent impact of a physician on the hospital's financial position, depending on whether one controlled for severity or not. The extent to which these differences in impact could be due to quality of care differences is an area for future research. However, the findings that 37 per cent of the physicians in the study may be wrongly identified as over- or under-utilizers suggest long-term public health consequences of preparing physician profiles based on unadjusted DRGs.
我们报告了一项研究,该研究使用两种患者分类方法来检查医生的执业概况:疾病严重程度指数和诊断相关分组(DRGs)。当与传统管理信息和DRGs一起使用时,疾病严重程度指数有助于对医生进行有益的比较;可以估计病例组合和严重程度的差异。在接受研究的医生中,我们发现,根据是否控制严重程度,一名医生对医院财务状况的明显影响相差超过10,000美元,这一情况在37%的医生中存在。这些影响差异在多大程度上可能归因于医疗质量差异,是未来研究的一个领域。然而,研究中有37%的医生可能被错误地认定为过度使用者或使用不足者,这一发现表明,基于未经调整的DRGs编制医生概况会产生长期的公共卫生后果。