Fink Geetha N, Dean Gillian, Nucci-Sack Anne, Arden Martha, Lunde Britt
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2019 Apr;32(2):175-181. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2018.10.005. Epub 2018 Oct 27.
To understand contraceptive behaviors and decision-making in school-based health center (SBHC) female patients who have used emergency contraception (EC).
Qualitative interviews and questionnaires.
SBHCs.
Female adolescents, who self-reported EC use, were recruited from SBHCs.
Interviews were conducted until thematic saturation was reached on the following themes: reasons for selecting EC, perceived EC efficacy, reasons for use, nonuse, or inconsistent use of nonemergent contraception (NEC), and beliefs surrounding pregnancy risk.
The team used a modified grounded theory approach and open coding technique to identify common themes. Participants completed a questionnaire to assess demographic information and EC knowledge.
Twenty-eight interviews were completed. Reasons for using EC include not using another contraceptive method, using another method incorrectly, or in combination with another method for added protection. Reasons for EC preference include ease of administration, ease of access, minimal side effects, perceived high efficacy, and because it can be used discreetly. Use of NEC was supported by identifying it as more effective, increased sexual experience and anticipation of sex, belief that excess EC decreases efficacy or is detrimental to health, and social interactions. Participants reported having used EC a mean of 3.5 times. Eighteen of 28 participants (65%) incorrectly believed that EC is 90%-99% effective, and 15 of 28 participants (53%) correctly identified ovulation inhibition as the mechanism of action.
EC use is promoted by ease of access and administration, experiencing minimal side effects, and perceived high efficacy. Compliance issues with NEC and condoms and a desire for a discreet contraceptive method support EC use.
了解在学校健康中心(SBHC)使用过紧急避孕(EC)的女性患者的避孕行为和决策过程。
定性访谈和问卷调查。
学校健康中心。
从学校健康中心招募的自我报告使用过紧急避孕的女性青少年。
进行访谈,直至在以下主题上达到主题饱和:选择紧急避孕的原因、对紧急避孕效果的认知、使用、不使用或不规律使用非紧急避孕(NEC)的原因以及对怀孕风险的看法。
研究团队采用改良的扎根理论方法和开放编码技术来确定共同主题。参与者完成一份问卷以评估人口统计学信息和紧急避孕知识。
完成了28次访谈。使用紧急避孕的原因包括未使用其他避孕方法、错误使用其他方法或与其他方法联合使用以增加保护。选择紧急避孕的原因包括给药方便、容易获得、副作用小、认为效果高以及可以谨慎使用。支持使用非紧急避孕的因素包括认为其更有效、性经历增加和对性的期待、认为过多使用紧急避孕会降低效果或对健康有害以及社交互动。参与者报告平均使用紧急避孕3.5次。28名参与者中有18名(65%)错误地认为紧急避孕的有效率为90%-99%,28名参与者中有15名(53%)正确识别排卵抑制为作用机制。
紧急避孕因易于获得和给药、副作用小以及认为效果高而得到推广。非紧急避孕和避孕套的依从性问题以及对谨慎避孕方法的需求支持了紧急避孕的使用。