Jamin C, Lachowsky M
169, boulevard Haussmann, 75008 Paris, France.
169, boulevard Haussmann, 75008 Paris, France.
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2015 Oct;44(8):706-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2014.12.006. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
In order to improve the understanding of hormonal contraceptive failures, this study evaluates the persistence of oral contraception and the use of emergency contraception (EC) during persistence incidents. We made the hypothesis of the existence of a strong link between the risk of unplanned pregnancies and these two parameters. In this study, we also evaluated women's perception of EC in order to elucidate the reasons of EC insufficient use.
One survey was carried out on Internet on a representative sample of women, aged 16-45.
In this survey, 3775 French women were interviewed (source-population). We defined a target population of 2415 fertile women who had heterosexual intercourse during the last 12 months, and a population of 760 women at risk of unintended pregnancy who had unprotected sexual intercourse during the last 12 months(risk-population). A little more than 30% of the target population, meaning 20% of the source-population (n=745) stopped their contraceptive method temporarily for an average time of two months. Almost 60% of women had a risk of unwanted pregnancy during this period without contraception, which is 59% of the risk-population. Only 20% of women among the population at risk used EC. The main reasons given for EC insufficient use were the misperception of the risk of pregnancy, the lack of knowledge about EC and its way of use.
For the first time, this survey shows that 13% of women (of the source population) decide to stop temporarily their contraceptive method for an average time of two months per year. Fifty-nine percent of unplanned pregnancy situations are due to this poor contraception persistence. Although there is a need to reduce the risk of women being at risk, it seems also highly desirable to overcome the consequences of this poor persistence. Giving information about EC and a systematic prescription during contraception consultations would lead to an increased use of EC.
为了增进对激素避孕失败情况的了解,本研究评估了口服避孕药的持续性以及持续性事件期间紧急避孕药(EC)的使用情况。我们假设意外怀孕风险与这两个参数之间存在紧密联系。在本研究中,我们还评估了女性对紧急避孕药的认知,以阐明紧急避孕药使用不足的原因。
在互联网上对16 - 45岁具有代表性的女性样本进行了一项调查。
在本次调查中,采访了3775名法国女性(源人群)。我们定义了一个目标人群,即过去12个月中有异性性行为的2415名育龄女性,以及一个意外怀孕风险人群,即过去12个月中有未采取保护措施性行为的760名女性(风险人群)。略多于30%的目标人群,即源人群的20%(n = 745)暂时停止了她们的避孕方法,平均时长为两个月。在此期间,近60%的女性在无避孕措施的情况下有意外怀孕风险,这占风险人群的59%。在有风险的人群中,只有20%的女性使用了紧急避孕药。紧急避孕药使用不足的主要原因是对怀孕风险的误解、对紧急避孕药及其使用方法缺乏了解。
这项调查首次表明,13%的女性(源人群中的)决定每年平均有两个月的时间暂时停止她们的避孕方法。59%的意外怀孕情况是由于这种较差的避孕持续性。虽然有必要降低女性面临风险的可能性,但克服这种较差持续性的后果似乎也非常必要。在避孕咨询期间提供有关紧急避孕药的信息并进行系统处方会导致紧急避孕药的使用增加。