Suppr超能文献

80 岁以上患者颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术后的长期生存和卒中评估。

Assessment of long-term survival and stroke after carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting in patients older than 80 years.

机构信息

First Unit of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy.

First Unit of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2019 Aug;70(2):522-529. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.10.121. Epub 2019 Mar 2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to analyze preoperative risk factors affecting long-term survival and the occurrence of stroke in patients older than 80 years undergoing either carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS) for carotid stenosis.

METHODS

Data of all consecutive patients treated from January 1999 to December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed and outcomes analyzed. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate long-term survival and the risk of stroke for both groups. Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to assess the relative risk of all-cause mortality and long-term stroke for patients in the presence of selected comorbidities, including preoperative symptoms, coronary artery disease, chronic renal failure, atrial fibrillation (AF), hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia. A P value <.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 473 patients older than 80 years (298 men [63%]) underwent either CEA (n = 178) or CAS. At 30 days, one patient died in the CEA group of unrelated causes; no deaths were recorded after CAS (0.6% vs 0%; P = .18). At 5 years, survival was 67.6% ± 4.9% after CEA and 90.2% ± 2.3% after CAS (P < .0001). The main cause of death after CEA and CAS was a neoplasm. Estimated freedom from any stroke at 5 years was 97.3% ± 0.5% after CEA and 93.2% ± 1.2% after CAS (P = .07). The presence of preoperative AF significantly affected long-term mortality after CAS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.34-1.98; P = .04) as well as being classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists class 3 at evaluation of the preoperative anesthesiology risk. The presence of preoperative AF was the only factor that significantly affected the occurrence of long-term stroke after both CAS (HR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.86-5.63; P = .001) and CEA (HR, 3.45; 95% CI, 2.29-8.19; P = .005).

CONCLUSIONS

Both CEA and CAS showed low 30-day mortality and any-stroke rates in patients older than 80 years. In the long term, survival was significantly better after CAS; however, deaths after CEA and CAS were mainly unrelated to the procedure. No significant differences were recorded in the occurrence of any stroke in the long term. The presence of preoperative AF significantly affected long-term survival after CAS as well as being classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists class 3 at evaluation of the preoperative anesthesiology risk. The presence of preoperative AF also significantly affected long-term risk of stroke after both CAS and CEA.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在分析影响 80 岁以上患者行颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)或颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)治疗颈动脉狭窄后长期生存和卒中发生的术前危险因素。

方法

回顾性分析 1999 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月期间连续治疗的所有患者的数据,并进行结局分析。Kaplan-Meier 分析用于估计两组患者的长期生存率和卒中风险。Cox 比例风险分析用于评估存在术前症状、冠状动脉疾病、慢性肾衰竭、心房颤动(AF)、高血压、糖尿病和血脂异常等选定合并症的患者的全因死亡率和长期卒中的相对风险。P 值<.05 被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

共有 473 名 80 岁以上(298 名男性[63%])患者接受了 CEA(n=178)或 CAS。CEA 组在 30 天时,有 1 例患者死于与手术无关的原因;CAS 组无死亡记录(0.6%比 0%;P=.18)。5 年时,CEA 组的生存率为 67.6%±4.9%,CAS 组为 90.2%±2.3%(P<.0001)。CEA 和 CAS 后死亡的主要原因是肿瘤。5 年时无任何卒中的估计率为 CEA 组 97.3%±0.5%,CAS 组 93.2%±1.2%(P=.07)。术前 AF 的存在显著影响 CAS 后的长期死亡率(风险比[HR],1.56;95%置信区间[CI],1.34-1.98;P=.04),以及在评估术前麻醉风险时被归类为美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)3 级。术前 AF 的存在是影响 CAS 后(HR,2.28;95%CI,1.86-5.63;P=.001)和 CEA 后(HR,3.45;95%CI,2.29-8.19;P=.005)长期卒中发生的唯一显著因素。

结论

CEA 和 CAS 均显示 80 岁以上患者 30 天死亡率和任何卒中发生率较低。长期来看,CAS 后的生存率显著提高;然而,CEA 和 CAS 后的死亡主要与手术无关。在长期随访中,任何卒中的发生率均无显著差异。术前 AF 的存在显著影响 CAS 后的长期生存率,以及在评估术前麻醉风险时被归类为 ASA 3 级。术前 AF 的存在也显著影响了 CEA 和 CAS 后长期卒中风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验