Suppr超能文献

精子 DNA 碎片指数影响辅助生殖技术结局:系统评价和 Meta 分析结合回顾性队列研究。

Sperm DNA fragmentation index influences assisted reproductive technology outcome: A systematic review and meta-analysis combined with a retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Reproductive Medicine Research Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Andrologia. 2019 Jul;51(6):e13263. doi: 10.1111/and.13263. Epub 2019 Mar 5.

Abstract

Studies have explored the influence of DNA damage in assisted reproductive technology (ART), but the outcome remains controversial. To determine whether sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI) has any effect on ART outcomes, we collected detailed data regarding 1,333 IVF cycles performed at our centre, and the data of our retrospective cohort study were extracted for this meta-analysis. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE and Google Scholar and performed a systemic review and meta-analysis. Primary meta-analysis of 10 studies comprising 1,785 couples showed that live birth rate was no significantly different between low-DFI group and high-DFI group (p > 0.05). Secondary meta-analysis of 25 studies comprising 3,992 couples showed a higher miscarriage rate in high-DFI group than in low-DFI group (RR=1.57 [1.18, 2.09], p < 0.01). Meta-analysis of eight studies comprising 17,879 embryos revealed a lower good-quality embryo rate (RR=0.65 [0.62, 0.68], p < 0.01). Meta-analysis of 23 studies comprising 6,771 cycles showed that the high-DFI group had a lower clinical pregnancy rate than low-DFI group (RR=0.85 [0.75, 0.96], p < 0.01). Heterogeneity of included studies weakened our conclusions. Our study showed that DFI has adverse effects on ART outcome. More well-designed studies exploring the association between DFI and ART outcome are desired.

摘要

研究探讨了 DNA 损伤在辅助生殖技术(ART)中的影响,但结果仍存在争议。为了确定精子 DNA 碎片化指数(DFI)是否对 ART 结局有影响,我们收集了本中心 1333 个 IVF 周期的详细数据,并对本回顾性队列研究的数据进行了荟萃分析。我们检索了 PubMed、Web of Science、EMBASE 和 Google Scholar,并进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。10 项研究共 1785 对夫妇的主要荟萃分析显示,低 DFI 组与高 DFI 组的活产率无显著差异(p>0.05)。25 项研究共 3992 对夫妇的二次荟萃分析显示,高 DFI 组的流产率高于低 DFI 组(RR=1.57[1.18, 2.09],p<0.01)。8 项研究共 17879 个胚胎的荟萃分析显示,优质胚胎率较低(RR=0.65[0.62, 0.68],p<0.01)。23 项研究共 6771 个周期的荟萃分析显示,高 DFI 组的临床妊娠率低于低 DFI 组(RR=0.85[0.75, 0.96],p<0.01)。纳入研究的异质性削弱了我们的结论。我们的研究表明,DFI 对 ART 结局有不良影响。需要更多设计良好的研究来探讨 DFI 与 ART 结局之间的关系。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验