Department of Psychology, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 55455, USA.
Psychol Res. 2020 Jul;84(5):1304-1319. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01161-x. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
Previous research has shown that visual working memory (VWM) can be modulated by space-based or feature-based attentional selection. However, it remains unclear how the two modes of attention operate jointly to affect VWM, and in particular, if involuntary feature-based attention plays a role in VWM. In this study, a pre-cued change detection paradigm was employed to investigate the concurrent effects of space- and feature-based attention on VWM. Space-based attention was manipulated by informative spatial cueing and by varying the proximity between the test item and the cued (fixated) memory item, while feature-based attention was induced in an involuntary manner by having the test item to share the same color or shape with the cued item on a fraction of trials. The results showed that: (1) the memory performance for the cued items was always better than the uncued items, suggesting a beneficial effect of voluntary spatial attention; (2) with a brief duration of the memory array (250 ms), cue-test proximity benefited VWM in the shape judgment task but not in the color judgment task, whereas with a longer duration (1200 ms), no proximity effect was found for either task; (3) VWM was improved for the same-colored items regardless of the task and duration; (4) VWM was improved for the same-shaped items only in the shape judgment task with the longer duration of the memory array. A discrimination task further showed that the proximity effect associated with VWM reflects a perceptual bottleneck in memory encoding for shape but not for color with a brief display. Our results suggest that involuntary feature-based attention could be triggered by spatial cueing to modulate VWM; involuntary color-based attention facilitates VWM independently of task, whereas shape-based facilitation is task-dependent, i.e., confined only to the shape judgment task, presumably reflecting different attention-guiding potencies of the two features.
先前的研究表明,视觉工作记忆(VWM)可以通过基于空间或基于特征的注意力选择来调节。然而,目前尚不清楚两种注意力模式如何共同作用来影响 VWM,特别是,非自愿的基于特征的注意力是否在 VWM 中发挥作用。在这项研究中,采用了预提示变化检测范式来研究基于空间和基于特征的注意力对 VWM 的并发影响。通过信息性空间提示和测试项与提示(注视)记忆项之间的接近程度来操纵基于空间的注意力,而通过在部分试验中使测试项与提示项具有相同的颜色或形状来非自愿地引起基于特征的注意力。结果表明:(1)提示项的记忆表现始终优于未提示项,这表明了自愿空间注意力的有益作用;(2)在记忆数组持续时间较短(250 毫秒)的情况下,提示-测试接近度有利于形状判断任务中的 VWM,但不利于颜色判断任务,而在记忆数组持续时间较长(1200 毫秒)的情况下,两种任务都没有发现接近度效应;(3)无论任务和持续时间如何,同色项的 VWM 都会得到改善;(4)仅在记忆数组持续时间较长的情况下,同形状项的 VWM 才会得到改善。一项辨别任务进一步表明,与 VWM 相关的接近度效应反映了在短暂显示时对形状进行记忆编码的感知瓶颈,但对颜色没有影响。我们的研究结果表明,非自愿的基于特征的注意力可以通过空间提示来触发,从而调节 VWM;非自愿的基于颜色的注意力独立于任务促进 VWM,而基于形状的促进则取决于任务,即仅限于形状判断任务,这可能反映了这两个特征的不同注意力引导能力。