• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

谁知道什么信息、何时被知晓?:对美国直接面向消费者的基因检测公司所提供隐私政策的一项调查。

Who Knows What, and When?: A Survey of the Privacy Policies Proffered by U.S. Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Companies.

作者信息

Hazel James W, Slobogin Christopher

机构信息

Vanderbilt University Medical Center.

Vanderbilt University.

出版信息

Cornell J Law Public Policy. 2018;28(1):35-66.

PMID:30840416
Abstract

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTC-GT) companies have proliferated in the past several years. Based on an analysis of genetic material submitted by consumers, these companies offer a wide array of services, ranging from providing information about health and ancestry to identification of surreptitiously-gathered biological material sent in by suspicious spouses. Federal and state laws are ambiguous about the types of disclosures these companies must make about how the genetic information they obtain is collected, used, and shared. In an effort to assist in developing such laws, this Article reports a survey of the privacy policies these companies purport to follow. It canvasses ninety DTC-GT companies operating in the United States and provides a detailed analysis of whether and to what extent those policies inform consumers about how their genetic information will be used and secured, with whom it will be shared, and a host of other issues. Using the Federal Trade Commission’s articulation of the Fair Information Practice Principles and the agency’s proposed Privacy Framework as the baseline, we conclude that most policies fall well short of the ideal.

摘要

在过去几年里,直接面向消费者的基因检测(DTC-GT)公司大量涌现。基于对消费者提交的遗传物质的分析,这些公司提供各种各样的服务,从提供健康和血统信息到识别可疑配偶送来的秘密采集的生物材料。联邦和州法律对于这些公司必须就其获取的基因信息如何被收集、使用和共享所进行的披露类型含糊不清。为了协助制定此类法律,本文报告了对这些公司声称遵循的隐私政策的一项调查。它调查了在美国运营的90家DTC-GT公司,并详细分析了这些政策是否以及在多大程度上告知消费者其基因信息将如何被使用和保护、将与谁共享,以及许多其他问题。以联邦贸易委员会对公平信息实践原则的阐述以及该机构提议的隐私框架为基准,我们得出结论,大多数政策远未达到理想状态。

相似文献

1
Who Knows What, and When?: A Survey of the Privacy Policies Proffered by U.S. Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Companies.谁知道什么信息、何时被知晓?:对美国直接面向消费者的基因检测公司所提供隐私政策的一项调查。
Cornell J Law Public Policy. 2018;28(1):35-66.
2
All your data (effectively) belong to us: data practices among direct-to-consumer genetic testing firms.你所有的数据(实际上)都归我们所有:直接面向消费者的基因检测公司的数据操作情况
Genet Med. 2017 May;19(5):513-520. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.136. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
3
Public Attitudes Toward Direct to Consumer Genetic Testing.公众对直接面向消费者的基因检测的态度。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2020 Mar 4;2019:774-783. eCollection 2019.
4
Protecting the privacy of newborns.保护新生儿的隐私。
NCSL Legisbrief. 2003 Feb;11(11):1-2.
5
Privacy of genetic information: a review of the laws in the United States.遗传信息隐私:美国法律综述
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2001;84(Pt 2):1292-5.
6
To know or not to know. Legal perspectives on genetic privacy and disclosure of an individual's genetic profile.知晓与否。关于基因隐私及个人基因信息披露的法律视角。
J Leg Med. 2000 Dec;21(4):557-92. doi: 10.1080/019476400455807.
7
Health-related direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a review of companies' policies with regard to genetic testing in minors.健康相关的直接面向消费者的基因检测:对各公司在未成年人基因检测方面的政策进行综述。
Fam Cancer. 2010 Mar;9(1):51-9. doi: 10.1007/s10689-009-9253-9. Epub 2009 Jun 2.
8
The limits of state laws to protect genetic information.州法律保护基因信息的局限性。
N Engl J Med. 2001 Aug 2;345(5):385-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200108023450523.
9
Breast cancer, the genetic "quick fix," and the Jewish community. Ethical, legal, and social challenges.乳腺癌、基因“快速解决方案”与犹太社区。伦理、法律及社会挑战。
Health Matrix Clevel. 1997 Winter;7(1):97-124.
10
Privacy, consent, and the electronic mental health record: The Person vs. the System.隐私、同意与电子心理健康记录:个人与系统之争。
J Psychiatr Pract. 2012 Jan;18(1):46-50. doi: 10.1097/01.pra.0000410987.38723.47.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethical Issues Associated With Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing.与直接面向消费者的基因检测相关的伦理问题。
Cureus. 2023 Jun 3;15(6):e39918. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39918. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
A game theoretic approach to balance privacy risks and familial benefits.一种平衡隐私风险和家庭利益的博弈论方法。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 28;13(1):6932. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33177-0.
3
The End of Genetic Privacy in the Blade Runner Canon.《银翼杀手》系列中基因隐私的终结
J Lit Sci. 2021;14(1-2):108-124.
4
Queer Kinship: Privacy Concerns in .酷儿亲属关系:……中的隐私问题
J Lit Sci. 2021;14(1-2):125-139.
5
Sociotechnical safeguards for genomic data privacy.基因组数据隐私的社会技术保障措施。
Nat Rev Genet. 2022 Jul;23(7):429-445. doi: 10.1038/s41576-022-00455-y. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
6
Considerations for developing regulations for direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a scoping review using the 3-I framework.制定直接面向消费者的基因检测法规的考量:使用3-I框架的范围综述
J Community Genet. 2022 Apr;13(2):155-170. doi: 10.1007/s12687-022-00582-3. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
7
Using game theory to thwart multistage privacy intrusions when sharing data.在数据共享时运用博弈论来挫败多阶段隐私入侵。
Sci Adv. 2021 Dec 10;7(50):eabe9986. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abe9986.
8
Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: Prospective users' attitudes toward information about ancestry and biological relationships.直接面向消费者的基因检测:潜在用户对有关祖先和生物关系信息的态度。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 29;16(11):e0260340. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260340. eCollection 2021.
9
Commercial DNA tests and police investigations: a broad bioethical perspective.商业DNA检测与警方调查:一个广义的生物伦理视角
J Med Ethics. 2021 Sep 11;47(12):788-95. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107568.
10
Ethical concerns relating to genetic risk scores for suicide.与自杀遗传风险评分相关的伦理问题。
Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2021 Dec;186(8):433-444. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32871. Epub 2021 Sep 1.