Judickas Šarūnas, Gineitytė Dalia, Kezytė Greta, Gaižauskas Ernestas, Šerpytis Mindaugas, Šipylaitė Jūratė
Clinic of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Acta Med Litu. 2018;25(3):125-131. doi: 10.6001/actamedica.v25i3.3859.
A larger cross-sectional area (CSA) of the internal jugular vein (IJV) makes catheterization easier and the Trendelenburg position is used to achieve this. Unfortunately, it is not comfortable for conscious patients. The aim was to evaluate the impact of alternative manoeuvres on the enlargement of the CSA of the IJV and to compare these manoeuvres with the Trendelenburg position.
A prospective study of 63 healthy volunteers was conducted. Two-dimensional ultrasound images of right IJV (RIJV) and left IJV (LIJV) were recorded at the level of the cricoid cartilage in the supine position with and without head rotation by 30 degrees during various manoeuvres.
The CSA of the RIJV and the LIJV significantly increased using hold of deep breath (mean size (cm) RIJV 1.59 ± 0.82, LIJV 1.07 ± 0.64; both < 0.001) and the Trendelenburg position (mean size (cm) RIJV 1.5 ± 0.68, LIJV 0.99 ± 0.54; both < 0.001). The 45-degree passive leg raise increased the CSA of only the RIJV (mean size (cm) 1.17 ± 0.61, = 0.024). These manoeuvres were compared with the Trendelenburg position. There was no significant difference in the size of the CSA using hold of deep breath on the LIJV ( = 0.08) and the RIJV ( = 0.203). The passive leg raise had a significantly weaker impact on the size of the CSA ( < 0.001 for both sides).
Hold of deep breath and 45-degree passive leg raise (the latter limited for the right side only) are alternative manoeuvres to improve visualization of internal jugular veins for conscious patients. Hold of deep breath was as effective as the Trendelenburg position.
颈内静脉(IJV)较大的横截面积(CSA)使导管插入术更容易进行,而特伦德伦伯卧位用于实现这一点。不幸的是,这对清醒患者来说并不舒适。目的是评估替代操作对颈内静脉CSA增大的影响,并将这些操作与特伦德伦伯卧位进行比较。
对63名健康志愿者进行了一项前瞻性研究。在各种操作过程中,于仰卧位且头部不旋转及头部旋转30度时,在环状软骨水平记录右侧颈内静脉(RIJV)和左侧颈内静脉(LIJV)的二维超声图像。
深吸气屏气(RIJV平均大小(cm)1.59±0.82,LIJV 1.07±0.64;两者均<0.001)和特伦德伦伯卧位(RIJV平均大小(cm)1.5±0.68,LIJV 0.99±0.54;两者均<0.001)时,RIJV和LIJV的CSA均显著增加。45度被动抬腿仅增加了RIJV的CSA(平均大小(cm)1.17±0.61,P = 0.024)。将这些操作与特伦德伦伯卧位进行比较。在LIJV(P = 0.08)和RIJV(P = 0.203)上,深吸气屏气时CSA大小无显著差异。被动抬腿对CSA大小的影响明显较弱(两侧均<0.001)。
深吸气屏气和45度被动抬腿(后者仅适用于右侧)是改善清醒患者颈内静脉可视化的替代操作。深吸气屏气与特伦德伦伯卧位效果相同。