• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用F-FDG PET/CT检查结果对日本患者食管癌和乳腺癌治疗反应评估的合适半定量指标的研究。

Investigation of appropriate semi-quantitative index for assessment of esophageal and breast cancer treatment response in Japanese patients using F-FDG PET/CT findings.

作者信息

Tsuchitani Tatsuya, Takahashi Yoshiyuki, Maeda Yoshihiro, Oda Masahiko, Enoki Takuya, Kotoura Noriko, Kitajima Kazuhiro

机构信息

Department of Radiological Technology, Hyogo College of Medicine College Hospital, Nishinomiya, Hyogo 663-8501 Japan.

出版信息

Hell J Nucl Med. 2019 Jan-Apr;22(1):20-24. doi: 10.1967/s002449910955. Epub 2019 Mar 7.

DOI:10.1967/s002449910955
PMID:30843006
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the correlation of the quantitative indexes standardized uptake value (SUV), SUV corrected for lean body mass (SUL) and SUV corrected for Japanese lean body mass (SULj) with body weight to develop an appropriate quantitative index independent of body weight fluctuation for assessment of response to cancer treatment in Japanese patients.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Fifty-six males with esophageal cancer and 30 females with breast cancer underwent fluorine-18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scans, once before and once after, receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to planned surgical resection. The maximum value, peak value, and average value of SUV, SUL and SULj were calculated by setting a spherical volume of interest (3cm diameter) in a normal area of the liver. The correlation between each index and body weight was obtained from the correlation coefficient (r) and the significance of the correlation was tested.

RESULTS

Analyses were conducted with all patients (P<0.01), as well as after dividing into those with only esophageal (P<0.05) or breast (P<0.01) cancer. Regarding the correlation coefficient between each index and body weight, a significant difference was seen for SUVmax, SUVpeak and SUVmean. In contrast, there was no correlation with body weight for SULmax, SULpeak, SULmean, SULjmax, SULjpeak, or SULjmean in any of the 3 groups.

CONCLUSION

Based on the correlation with body weight, we concluded that both SUL and SULj (SUL corrected for Japanese lean body mass) is useful for assessment of cancer treatment response in Japanese patients.

摘要

目的

研究标准化摄取值(SUV)、去脂体重校正后的SUV(SUL)和日本去脂体重校正后的SUV(SULj)等定量指标与体重的相关性,以建立一个不受体重波动影响的合适定量指标,用于评估日本患者癌症治疗的反应。

对象与方法

56例男性食管癌患者和30例女性乳腺癌患者在计划手术切除前接受新辅助化疗,化疗前后各进行一次氟-18-氟-2-脱氧-D-葡萄糖(F-FDG)正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)。通过在肝脏正常区域设置一个直径为3cm的球形感兴趣区来计算SUV、SUL和SULj的最大值、峰值和平均值。从相关系数(r)得出各指标与体重之间的相关性,并对相关性的显著性进行检验。

结果

对所有患者(P<0.01)以及分别按食管癌(P<0.05)或乳腺癌(P<0.01)分组后的患者进行了分析。关于各指标与体重之间的相关系数,SUVmax、SUVpeak和SUVmean存在显著差异。相比之下,在3组中的任何一组中,SULmax、SULpeak、SULmean、SULjmax、SULjpeak或SULjmean与体重均无相关性。

结论

基于与体重的相关性,我们得出结论,SUL和SULj(日本去脂体重校正后的SUL)均有助于评估日本患者的癌症治疗反应。

相似文献

1
Investigation of appropriate semi-quantitative index for assessment of esophageal and breast cancer treatment response in Japanese patients using F-FDG PET/CT findings.利用F-FDG PET/CT检查结果对日本患者食管癌和乳腺癌治疗反应评估的合适半定量指标的研究。
Hell J Nucl Med. 2019 Jan-Apr;22(1):20-24. doi: 10.1967/s002449910955. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
2
Tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer assessed with CT and FDG-PET/CT - RECIST 1.1 vs. PERCIST 1.0.CT 和 FDG-PET/CT 评估食管癌患者新辅助化疗的肿瘤反应:RECIST 1.1 与 PERCIST 1.0 比较。
Eur J Radiol. 2018 Apr;101:65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.02.009. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
3
Comparison of prone versus supine 18F-FDG-PET of locally advanced breast cancer: Phantom and preliminary clinical studies.局部晚期乳腺癌俯卧位与仰卧位18F-FDG-PET的比较:模型研究与初步临床研究
Med Phys. 2015 Jul;42(7):3801-13. doi: 10.1118/1.4921363.
4
The value of pre- and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy F-18 FDG PET/CT scans in breast cancer: comparison with MRI.新辅助化疗前后F-18 FDG PET/CT扫描在乳腺癌中的价值:与MRI的比较
Acta Radiol. 2018 Jan;59(1):41-49. doi: 10.1177/0284185117705011. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
5
Is SUV Corrected for Lean Body Mass Superior to SUV of Body Weight in Ga-PSMA PET/CT?在镓-PSMA PET/CT中,基于去脂体重校正的SUV是否优于基于体重的SUV?
Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther. 2021 Oct 15;30(3):144-149. doi: 10.4274/mirt.galenos.2021.59254.
6
Correlation between functional imaging markers derived from diffusion-weighted MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in esophageal cancer.基于扩散加权磁共振成像的功能成像标志物与食管癌18F-氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层显像/计算机断层扫描之间的相关性
Nucl Med Commun. 2018 Jan;39(1):60-67. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000771.
7
Revisiting Weight-Normalized SUV and Lean-Body-Mass-Normalized SUV in PET Studies.重新探讨 PET 研究中的体重标准化 SUV 和瘦体重标准化 SUV。
J Nucl Med Technol. 2020 Jun;48(2):163-167. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.119.233353. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
8
[Tc]3PRGD for integrin receptor imaging of esophageal cancer: a comparative study with [F]FDG PET/CT.用于食管癌整合素受体成像的[锝]3PRGD:与[氟]FDG PET/CT的对比研究
Ann Nucl Med. 2019 Feb;33(2):135-143. doi: 10.1007/s12149-018-1315-3. Epub 2018 Nov 3.
9
SUV calculation in breast cancer: which normalization should be applied when using 18F-FDG PET?乳腺癌中的SUV计算:使用18F-FDG PET时应采用哪种归一化方法?
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019 Dec;63(4):399-407. doi: 10.23736/S1824-4785.18.03006-6. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
10
Metabolic activity in bone metastases of breast and prostate cancer were similar as studied by F-FDG PET/CT. The role of Tc-MDP.通过F-FDG PET/CT研究发现,乳腺癌和前列腺癌骨转移灶中的代谢活性相似。锝-亚甲基二膦酸盐(Tc-MDP)的作用。
Hell J Nucl Med. 2017 Sep-Dec;20(3):237-240. doi: 10.1967/s002449910608. Epub 2017 Nov 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of standardized uptake value and standardized uptake lean body mass metrics in F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for assessing transformation in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and follicular lymphoma.用于评估慢性淋巴细胞白血病和滤泡性淋巴瘤转变的F-氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描中标准化摄取值与标准化摄取值瘦体重指标的比较
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Aug 1;15(8):6616-6626. doi: 10.21037/qims-2024-2740. Epub 2025 Jul 29.