Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, 106A Guyot Hall, Princeton, NJ, 08544, U.S.A.
Sante Fe Institute, 1399 Hyde Park Road, Santa Fe, NM, 87501, U.S.A.
Conserv Biol. 2020 Feb;34(1):66-79. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13308. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
The importance of large reserves has been long maintained in the scientific literature, often leading to dismissal of the conservation potential of small reserves. However, over half the global protected-area inventory is composed of protected areas that are <100 ha, and the median size of added protected area is decreasing. Studies of the conservation value of small reserves and fragments of natural area are relatively uncommon in the literature. We reviewed SCOPUS and WOK for studies on small reserve and fragment contributions to biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services, and fifty-eight taxon-specific studies were included in the review. Small reserves harbored substantial portions (upward of 50%) of regional species diversity for many taxa (birds, plants, amphibians, and small mammals) and even some endemic, specialist bird species. Unfortunately, small reserves and fragments almost always harbored more generalist and exotic species than large reserves. Community composition depended on habitat quality, surrounding land use (agricultural vs. urban), and reserve and fragment size, which presents opportunities for management and improvement. Small reserves also provided ecosystem services, such as pollination and biological pest control, and cultural services, such as recreation and improved human health. Limitations associated with small reserves, such as extinction debt and support of area-sensitive species, necessitate a complement of larger reserves. However, we argue that small reserves can make viable and significant contributions to conservation goals directly as habitat and indirectly by increasing landscape connectivity and quality to the benefit of large reserves. To effectively conserve biodiversity for future generations in landscapes fragmented by human development, small reserves and fragments must be included in conservation planning.
大保护区的重要性在科学文献中早已得到长期维护,这往往导致小保护区的保护潜力被忽视。然而,全球保护区存量的一半以上由面积小于 100 公顷的保护区组成,并且新增保护区的平均面积正在减少。在文献中,对小保护区和自然区域碎片的保护价值的研究相对较少。我们在 SCOPUS 和 WOK 上检索了有关小保护区和碎片对生物多样性保护和生态系统服务贡献的研究,共有 58 项针对特定分类群的研究被纳入综述。对于许多分类群(鸟类、植物、两栖动物和小型哺乳动物),包括一些地方性、特化鸟类物种,小保护区拥有相当大比例(超过 50%)的区域物种多样性。不幸的是,小保护区和碎片通常比大保护区拥有更多的广布种和外来种。群落组成取决于栖息地质量、周围土地利用(农业与城市)以及保护区和碎片的大小,这为管理和改善提供了机会。小保护区还提供了生态系统服务,如授粉和生物防治病虫害,以及文化服务,如娱乐和改善人类健康。小保护区的局限性,如灭绝债务和支持对面积敏感的物种,需要更大的保护区作为补充。然而,我们认为,小保护区可以作为栖息地,直接为保护目标做出可行且重要的贡献,也可以通过增加景观连通性和质量,间接为大保护区带来好处。为了在受人类发展影响的破碎化景观中为子孙后代有效保护生物多样性,必须将小保护区和碎片纳入保护规划中。