Suppr超能文献

“限制或减少赌博行为的改变策略类型及其感知的有效性:因素分析。”对 Rodda 等人(2018 年)的更正。

"Types of change strategies for limiting or reducing gambling behaviors and their perceived helpfulness: A factor analysis." Correction to Rodda et al. (2018).

机构信息

Turning Point.

Public Health and Health Services Research.

出版信息

Psychol Addict Behav. 2019 Mar;33(2):138. doi: 10.1037/adb0000462.

Abstract

Reports an error in "Types of change strategies for limiting or reducing gambling behaviors and their perceived helpfulness: A factor analysis" by Simone N. Rodda, Kathleen L. Bagot, Alison Cheetham, David C. Hodgins, Nerilee Hing and Dan I. Lubman (, 2018[Sep], Vol 32[6], 679-688). In the article the ethics approval details appearing in the last sentence of the second paragraph of the Participants section are incorrect and should appear instead as follows: Ethics approval for the study was gained by Eastern Health Research and Ethics Committee (study registration number LR22/1314). (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2018-44923-008.) Gamblers engage with a broad range of resources and strategies to limit or reduce their gambling. However, there is limited research examining the uptake and helpfulness of the full range of strategies gamblers employ. The aim of this study was to compile a comprehensive inventory of change strategies and then group these using principal component analysis based on perceived helpfulness. We also aimed to determine whether there are differences in the helpfulness of strategies by demographic, gambling severity, and readiness indicators. The Change Strategies Questionnaire-Version 1 contained 99 strategies, and 489 gamblers (including 333 problem gamblers) identified the most frequently endorsed strategy as remind yourself of negative consequences of gambling (92%) and think about how money could be better spent (92%). Principal components analysis identified 15 strategy groupings: cognitive, well-being, consumption control, behavioral substitution, financial management, urge management, self-monitoring, information seeking, spiritual, avoidance, social support, exclusion, planning, feedback, and limit finances. There were differences in the helpfulness of strategies by age and gambling severity. Few strategies were correlated with confidence to manage an urge to gamble. Overall, change strategies were viewed as moderately helpful. The top five strategies were all used by at least 90% of gamblers, and these strategies were all cognitive in nature. This study provides important information for the development of interventions targeting gambling behavior. Furthermore, it suggests that interventions for problem gambling should target cognitive, feedback, planning, and urge management strategies. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

报告了 Simone N. Rodda、Kathleen L. Bagot、Alison Cheetham、David C. Hodgins、Nerilee Hing 和 Dan I. Lubman 的文章“限制或减少赌博行为的变化策略类型及其感知的帮助:因素分析”中的错误(,2018 年 9 月,第 32 卷,第 679-688 页)。在文章中,参与者部分第二段最后一句话中的伦理批准细节是不正确的,应该改为如下内容:该研究的伦理批准是由东健康研究和伦理委员会获得的(研究注册号 LR22/1314)。(原始文章的摘要如下出现在记录 2018-44923-008 中。)赌徒会接触到广泛的资源和策略来限制或减少他们的赌博。然而,关于赌徒所采用的各种策略的采用和有效性的研究有限。本研究的目的是编制一份全面的变化策略清单,然后根据感知的有效性使用主成分分析对这些策略进行分组。我们还旨在确定策略的有效性是否因人口统计学、赌博严重程度和准备度指标而异。变化策略问卷 - 第 1 版包含 99 种策略,489 名赌徒(包括 333 名问题赌徒)将最常被认可的策略确定为提醒自己赌博的负面影响(92%)和思考如何更好地花钱(92%)。主成分分析确定了 15 个策略分组:认知、幸福、消费控制、行为替代、财务管理、冲动管理、自我监控、信息寻求、精神、回避、社会支持、排除、计划、反馈和限制财务。年龄和赌博严重程度对策略的有效性有影响。很少有策略与管理冲动赌博的信心相关。总体而言,变化策略被认为是中等程度的帮助。前五名策略的使用比例都在 90%以上,这些策略都是认知性质的。这项研究为针对赌博行为的干预措施的发展提供了重要信息。此外,它表明针对问题赌博的干预措施应针对认知、反馈、计划和冲动管理策略。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验