• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

限制或减少赌博行为的改变策略类型及其感知的有效性:一项因素分析。

Types of change strategies for limiting or reducing gambling behaviors and their perceived helpfulness: A factor analysis.

机构信息

Turning Point, Eastern Health.

Public Health and Health Services Research, The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health.

出版信息

Psychol Addict Behav. 2018 Sep;32(6):679-688. doi: 10.1037/adb0000393.

DOI:10.1037/adb0000393
PMID:30211588
Abstract

Gamblers engage with a broad range of resources and strategies to limit or reduce their gambling. However, there is limited research examining the uptake and helpfulness of the full range of strategies gamblers employ. The aim of this study was to compile a comprehensive inventory of change strategies and then group these using principal component analysis based on perceived helpfulness. We also aimed to determine whether there are differences in the helpfulness of strategies by demographic, gambling severity, and readiness indicators. The Change Strategies Questionnaire-Version 1 contained 99 strategies, and 489 gamblers (including 333 problem gamblers) identified the most frequently endorsed strategy as remind yourself of negative consequences of gambling (92%) and think about how money could be better spent (92%). Principal components analysis identified 15 strategy groupings: cognitive, well-being, consumption control, behavioral substitution, financial management, urge management, self-monitoring, information seeking, spiritual, avoidance, social support, exclusion, planning, feedback, and limit finances. There were differences in the helpfulness of strategies by age and gambling severity. Few strategies were correlated with confidence to manage an urge to gamble. Overall, change strategies were viewed as moderately helpful. The top five strategies were all used by at least 90% of gamblers, and these strategies were all cognitive in nature. This study provides important information for the development of interventions targeting gambling behavior. Furthermore, it suggests that interventions for problem gambling should target cognitive, feedback, planning, and urge management strategies. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

赌徒会使用各种资源和策略来限制或减少赌博。然而,关于赌徒所采用的各种策略的采用率和有效性的研究有限。本研究旨在编制一份全面的改变策略清单,然后根据感知的有效性使用主成分分析对这些策略进行分组。我们还旨在确定策略的有效性是否因人口统计学、赌博严重程度和准备度指标的差异而有所不同。改变策略问卷-第 1 版包含 99 种策略,489 名赌徒(包括 333 名问题赌徒)确定最常被认可的策略是提醒自己赌博的负面后果(92%)和考虑如何更好地花钱(92%)。主成分分析确定了 15 种策略分组:认知、幸福、消费控制、行为替代、财务管理、冲动管理、自我监控、信息寻求、精神、避免、社会支持、排除、计划、反馈和限制财务。策略的有效性因年龄和赌博严重程度而异。很少有策略与管理赌博冲动的信心相关。总体而言,改变策略被认为是中等有效的。前五名策略的使用率均在 90%以上,这些策略均为认知性质。这项研究为针对赌博行为的干预措施的发展提供了重要信息。此外,这表明针对问题赌博的干预措施应针对认知、反馈、计划和冲动管理策略。

相似文献

1
Types of change strategies for limiting or reducing gambling behaviors and their perceived helpfulness: A factor analysis.限制或减少赌博行为的改变策略类型及其感知的有效性:一项因素分析。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2018 Sep;32(6):679-688. doi: 10.1037/adb0000393.
2
"Types of change strategies for limiting or reducing gambling behaviors and their perceived helpfulness: A factor analysis." Correction to Rodda et al. (2018).“限制或减少赌博行为的改变策略类型及其感知的有效性:因素分析。”对 Rodda 等人(2018 年)的更正。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2019 Mar;33(2):138. doi: 10.1037/adb0000462.
3
Behaviour Change Strategies Endorsed by Gamblers Subtyped by Psychological Distress, Risky Alcohol Use, and Impulsivity.根据心理困扰、危险饮酒和冲动程度对赌徒进行分类,分析他们所支持的行为改变策略。
J Gambl Stud. 2019 Mar;35(1):275-292. doi: 10.1007/s10899-018-9803-x.
4
Subtyping based on readiness and confidence: the identification of help-seeking profiles for gamblers accessing web-based counselling.基于准备度和信心的亚类型划分:识别寻求网络咨询服务的赌徒的求助特征。
Addiction. 2015 Mar;110(3):494-501. doi: 10.1111/add.12796. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
5
Cue-Reactive Rationality, Visual Imagery and Volitional Control Predict Cue-Reactive Urge to Gamble in Poker-Machine Gamblers.线索反应理性、视觉意象和意志控制预测老虎机赌瘾者的线索反应性赌博冲动。
J Gambl Stud. 2017 Sep;33(3):807-823. doi: 10.1007/s10899-016-9650-6.
6
Internet Gamblers Differ on Social Variables: A Latent Class Analysis.网民在社会变量上存在差异:潜在类别分析。
J Gambl Stud. 2017 Sep;33(3):881-897. doi: 10.1007/s10899-016-9664-0.
7
The importance of friends and family to recreational gambling, at-risk gambling, and problem gambling.朋友和家人对娱乐性赌博、有风险的赌博和问题赌博的重要性。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Aug 30;18(1):1080. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5988-2.
8
A Case of Mistaken Identity? A Comparison of Professional and Amateur Problem Gamblers.身份误认?职业与业余问题赌徒的比较
J Gambl Stud. 2016 Mar;32(1):277-89. doi: 10.1007/s10899-015-9531-4.
9
Change Strategies and Associated Implementation Challenges: An Analysis of Online Counselling Sessions.改变策略及相关实施挑战:在线咨询会议分析。
J Gambl Stud. 2017 Sep;33(3):955-973. doi: 10.1007/s10899-016-9661-3.
10
Trait Mindfulness, Problem-Gambling Severity, Altered State of Awareness and Urge to Gamble in Poker-Machine Gamblers.老虎机玩家的特质正念、问题赌博严重程度、意识改变状态及赌博冲动
J Gambl Stud. 2017 Jun;33(2):617-632. doi: 10.1007/s10899-016-9635-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Acceptability of the content and functionality of a just-in-time adaptive intervention for gambling problems: a mixed-methods evaluation of gambling habit hacker.即时自适应赌博问题干预措施的内容和功能可接受性:对赌博习惯黑客的混合方法评估
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2025 Jun 5;20(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s13722-025-00573-y.
2
Clinical consensus statements on change techniques for gambling treatment: A Delphi study with clinicians.赌博治疗改变技术的临床共识声明:一项针对临床医生的德尔菲研究。
J Behav Addict. 2025 Feb 14;14(1):430-444. doi: 10.1556/2006.2025.00004. Print 2025 Mar 28.
3
Computerized cognitive training for problem gambling: A randomized controlled trial (TRAIN-online).
针对问题赌博的计算机化认知训练:一项随机对照试验(TRAIN-online)。
J Behav Addict. 2025 Jan 17;14(1):445-456. doi: 10.1556/2006.2024.00080. Print 2025 Mar 28.
4
What is known about population level programs designed to address gambling-related harm: rapid review of the evidence.针对赌博相关危害而设计的人群水平项目的已知情况:证据快速审查。
Harm Reduct J. 2024 Jun 18;21(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-01032-8.
5
Applying the Just-In-Time Adaptive Intervention Framework to the Development of Gambling Interventions.将及时自适应干预框架应用于赌博干预措施的开发。
J Gambl Stud. 2024 Jun;40(2):717-747. doi: 10.1007/s10899-023-10250-x. Epub 2023 Sep 2.
6
Treatment for problem gambling and counselors' perception of their clinical competence: a national web survey in Sweden.治疗问题赌博和顾问对其临床能力的看法:瑞典全国网络调查。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2022 Dec 9;17(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s13722-022-00347-w.
7
Making Change: Attempts to Reduce or Stop Gambling in a General Population Sample of People Who Gamble.做出改变:在一般赌博人群样本中减少或停止赌博的尝试。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 17;13:892238. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.892238. eCollection 2022.
8
Smartphone App Delivery of a Just-In-Time Adaptive Intervention for Adult Gamblers (Gambling Habit Hacker): Protocol for a Microrandomized Trial.针对成年赌徒的即时自适应干预措施(赌博习惯破解器)的智能手机应用程序交付:一项微随机试验的方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Jul 26;11(7):e38919. doi: 10.2196/38919.
9
Global prevalence of help-seeking for problem gambling: A systematic review and meta-analysis.全球寻求问题赌博帮助的患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Addiction. 2022 Dec;117(12):2972-2985. doi: 10.1111/add.15952. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
10
A scoping review of hard systems and tools that restrict money and cash for gambling.对限制赌博金钱和现金的硬系统和工具的范围综述。
J Behav Addict. 2021 Sep 17;10(3):587-600. doi: 10.1556/2006.2021.00065.