Peking University China, Center for Health Development Studies, People's Republic of China; Department of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, UK.
Centre for History in Public Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, UK.
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Apr;226:56-62. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.02.025. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
Stronger primary care has been associated with important contributions to health system performance, yet countries struggle to resource it adequately, given competing demands from hospitals. Although historically China has originated influential models of primary health care, it has an enduring problem with hospital dominance in health service delivery. This paper is a historical analysis of the co-evolution of hospitals and primary care providers in China from 1835 (the year when the first hospital was built in mainland China) to 1949 (the year when the People's Republic of China was founded), which aims to shed light on approaches to primary care strengthening. We develop and use a path dependence analytic framework, specifying the critical juncture, conjuncture and post-juncture development of the institutions shaping the balance between hospitals and primary care providers in China. We find that China had historically formed the hospital-centric model involving four sets of regenerating and mutually reinforcing institutions: 1) financial resources were being disproportionally distributed to hospitals; 2) high-quality medical professionals were largely concentrated in hospitals; 3) large outpatient departments were incorporated in hospitals, which functioned as a first point of care for many patients; 4) hospitals answered primarily to the demand of the more privileged social group. The early institutionalization of a hospital-centric model of Western medicine in China from 1835 became resistant to change, and efforts to strengthen primary care eventually took a divergent low-cost and de-professionalized developmental path towards 1949. As China still has a hospital-centric health system seeded in the nineteenth century, these findings can inform the framing of contemporary options for primary care strengthening. Without addressing these deep regenerating causes using a whole-system approach, China is unlikely to achieve a primary care orientation for health system development.
基层医疗服务得到加强与卫生系统绩效的重要贡献息息相关,但由于医院的竞争需求,各国在为其提供充足资源方面仍面临挑战。尽管中国历史上曾开创过有影响力的基层医疗服务模式,但在医疗服务提供方面,医院一直占据主导地位,这一问题长期存在。本文对 1835 年(中国大陆第一家医院建成的年份)至 1949 年(中华人民共和国成立的年份)期间中国医院和基层医疗服务提供者的协同演变进行了历史分析,旨在为加强基层医疗服务提供方法提供启示。我们开发并使用了一个路径依赖分析框架,具体说明了塑造中国医院和基层医疗服务提供者之间平衡的制度的关键转折点、结合点和后结合点发展。我们发现,中国历史上形成了以医院为中心的模式,涉及四组不断再生和相互加强的制度:1)财政资源不成比例地分配给医院;2)高质量的医疗专业人员主要集中在医院;3)大型门诊部并入医院,为许多患者提供了第一就诊点;4)医院主要满足更有特权的社会群体的需求。1835 年以来,西医以医院为中心的模式的早期制度化变得难以改变,加强基层医疗服务的努力最终在 1949 年朝着低成本和去专业化的方向发展。由于中国仍然存在着十九世纪形成的以医院为中心的卫生系统,这些发现可以为当前加强基层医疗服务的选择提供参考。如果不采取整体系统方法解决这些深层次的再生原因,中国不太可能实现以基层医疗为导向的卫生系统发展。