Suppr超能文献

美国阿片类药物过量死亡与治疗能力之间的差距:一项地理空间和描述性分析。

Disparities Between US Opioid Overdose Deaths and Treatment Capacity: A Geospatial and Descriptive Analysis.

机构信息

University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX.

出版信息

J Addict Med. 2019 Nov/Dec;13(6):476-482. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000523.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

With opioid-related deaths reaching epidemic levels, gaining a better understanding of access to treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) is critical. Most studies have focused on 1 side of the equation-either provider capacity or patients' need for care, as measured by overdose deaths. This study examines the overlay between treatment program availability and opioid mortality, comparing accessibility by region.

METHODS

Geospatial and statistical analyses were used to model OUD treatment programs relative to population density and opioid overdose death incidence at the state and county level. We computed a ratio between program capacity and mortality called the programs-per-death (PPD) ratio.

RESULTS

There were 40 274 opioid deaths in 2016 and 12 572 treatment programs across the contiguous 48 states, yielding a ratio of 1 program for every 3.2 deaths. Texas had the lowest number of treatment programs per 100 000 persons (1.4) and Maine the highest (13.2). West Virginia ranked highest in opioid deaths (39.09 per 100 000). Ohio, the District of Columbia, and West Virginia had the greatest mismatch between providers and deaths, with an average of 1 program for every 8.5 deaths. Over 32% of US counties had no treatment programs and among those with >10 deaths, nearly 2.5% had no programs. Over 19% of all counties had a ratio ≤1 provider facility per 10 deaths.

CONCLUSION

Assessing the overlay between treatment capacity and need demonstrated that regional imbalances exist. These data can aid in strategic planning to correct the mismatch and potentially reduce mortality in the most challenged geographic regions.

摘要

简介

随着阿片类药物相关死亡人数达到流行水平,深入了解治疗阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)的途径至关重要。大多数研究都集中在等式的一方——提供者能力或患者对护理的需求,这是通过过量死亡来衡量的。本研究通过比较区域间的治疗方案可及性,检查治疗方案的可用性与阿片类药物死亡率之间的重叠。

方法

使用地理空间和统计分析来模拟与人口密度和州和县一级阿片类药物过量死亡发生率相关的 OUD 治疗方案。我们计算了一个称为每死亡人数治疗方案(PPD)比率的方案能力与死亡率之间的比率。

结果

2016 年有 40274 例阿片类药物死亡和 12572 个治疗方案分布在 48 个州,每 3.2 例死亡就有 1 个治疗方案。得克萨斯州每 10 万人拥有的治疗方案数量最少(1.4),缅因州最高(13.2)。西弗吉尼亚州的阿片类药物死亡率最高(39.09 例/10 万人)。俄亥俄州、哥伦比亚特区和西弗吉尼亚州的提供者和死亡人数之间的不匹配程度最大,平均每 8.5 例死亡就有 1 个治疗方案。超过 32%的美国县没有治疗方案,在有超过 10 例死亡的县中,近 2.5%没有治疗方案。超过 19%的县每 10 例死亡的治疗方案数≤1。

结论

评估治疗能力与需求之间的重叠表明存在区域失衡。这些数据可以帮助进行战略规划,以纠正最具挑战性的地理区域的不匹配,并有可能降低死亡率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验