Comparison of venous couplers versus hand-sewn technique in free flap breast reconstruction.

INTRODUCTION

Despite positive outcomes reported in the literature, some surgeons remain reluctant to the systematic use of venous couplers in free flap tissue transfer. In our institution, the use of the coupler devices for venous anastomosis in free flap breast reconstruction has yet to be adopted by all surgeons. The purpose of the study was to compare postoperative outcomes of coupler-assisted venous anastomoses with hand-sewn techniques in free flap breast reconstruction.

METHODS

An analysis of collected data was performed on cases of breast reconstruction with free tissue transfer after mastectomy in breast cancer or BRCA-positive patients from 2010 to 2016. Patients were divided into two groups: coupler device and hand-sewn. The primary outcome was survival rate of free flaps. Secondary outcomes included potential complications, as well as surgical characteristics (recipient artery/vein, coupler size, type of hand-sewn anastomosis, size of sutures, number of venous anastomoses, ischemia time, operative time) RESULTS: We included 289 cases in our study. There were no significant differences between groups in terms of post-operative complications or survival rate of the free flaps. Ischemia time was significantly lower in both immediate and delayed reconstruction cases. Operative and anesthesia times were significantly lower only in immediate unilateral cases.

CONCLUSION

Although ischemia time was reduced in the coupler group, we didn't find any significant difference in the operative and anesthesia time in the subgroup analysis, except for the group of immediate unilateral breast reconstruction. Couplers are safe and efficient; nevertheless, our study shows that their qualities cannot yet justify the disappearance of the manual sutures.