• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Correlation between MRI phenotypes and a genomic classifier of prostate cancer: preliminary findings.MRI 表型与前列腺癌基因组分类器的相关性:初步研究结果。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Sep;29(9):4861-4870. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06114-x. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
2
Transcriptome Wide Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy and Matching Surgical Specimens from High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Radical Prostatectomy: The Target Must Be Hit.基于 MRI 靶向穿刺和高风险前列腺癌根治术患者手术标本的转录组全分析:靶向必须命中。
Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Jul;4(4):540-546. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.01.005. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
3
Comparison of PI-RADS v1 and v2 for multiparametric MRI detection of prostate cancer with whole-mount histological workup as reference standard.PI-RADS v1 与 v2 对全组织切片病理检查作为参考标准的多参数 MRI 前列腺癌检测的比较。
Eur J Radiol. 2019 Jul;116:180-185. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.04.012. Epub 2019 May 14.
4
Prostate Cancer Genomic Classifier Relates More Strongly to Gleason Grade Group Than Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Score in Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging-ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsies.在多参数前列腺磁共振成像-超声融合靶向活检中,前列腺癌基因组分类器与Gleason分级组的相关性比前列腺影像报告和数据系统评分更强。
Urology. 2019 Mar;125:64-72. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.12.001. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
5
Effect of observation size and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value in PI-RADS v2.1 assessment category 4 and 5 observations compared to adverse pathological outcomes.对比观察大小和表观扩散系数(ADC)值在 PI-RADS v2.1 评估类别 4 和 5 观察中的作用与不良病理结果。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Aug;30(8):4251-4261. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06725-9. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
6
Investigating the role of DCE-MRI, over T2 and DWI, in accurate PI-RADS v2 assessment of clinically significant peripheral zone prostate lesions as defined at radical prostatectomy.探讨 DCE-MRI 相对于 T2 和 DWI 在经根治性前列腺切除术定义的有临床意义的外周带前列腺病变的 PI-RADS v2 评估中的准确作用。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Apr;44(4):1520-1527. doi: 10.1007/s00261-018-1807-6.
7
Characterization and PI-RADS version 2 assessment of prostate cancers missed by prebiopsy 3-T multiparametric MRI: Correlation with whole-mount thin-section histopathology.前列腺癌的特征分析及 PI-RADS 版本 2 评估:与全薄片组织病理学的相关性研究,这些前列腺癌在前列腺穿刺活检前的 3-T 多参数 MRI 检查中漏诊。
Clin Imaging. 2019 May-Jun;55:174-180. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2019.03.004. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
8
The combination of prostate MRI PI-RADS scoring system and a genomic classifier is associated with pelvic lymph node metastasis at the time of radical prostatectomy.前列腺 MRI PI-RADS 评分系统与基因组分类器的联合应用与根治性前列腺切除术后盆腔淋巴结转移相关。
Br J Radiol. 2023 Mar 1;96(1144):20220663. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20220663. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
9
Low PI-RADS assessment category excludes extraprostatic extension (≥pT3a) of prostate cancer: a histology-validated study including 301 operated patients.低 PI-RADS 评估类别排除前列腺癌的前列腺外延伸(≥pT3a):一项包括 301 例手术患者的组织学验证研究。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Oct;29(10):5478-5487. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06092-0. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
10
PI-RADS v2 and periprostatic fat measured on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging can predict upgrading in radical prostatectomy pathology amongst patients with biopsy Gleason score 3 + 3 prostate cancer.多参数磁共振成像测量的PI-RADS v2和前列腺周围脂肪能够预测活检Gleason评分为3+3的前列腺癌患者根治性前列腺切除术后病理分级的提升。
Scand J Urol. 2018 Oct-Dec;52(5-6):333-339. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2018.1545799.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the Molecular Heterogeneity of Prostate Cancer Biopsy Sampling: Insights from the MAST Trial.评估前列腺癌活检采样的分子异质性:来自MAST试验的见解。
Eur Urol Focus. 2024 Dec 10. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2024.11.012.
2
ReIGNITE Radiation Therapy Boost: A Prospective, International Study of Radiation Oncologists' Accuracy in Contouring Prostate Tumors for Focal Radiation Therapy Boost on Conventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Alone or With Assistance of Restriction Spectrum Imaging.REIGNITE 放疗增敏:一项关于放疗肿瘤学家在单独使用常规磁共振成像或结合限制谱成像辅助下勾画前列腺肿瘤以进行局灶放疗增敏的准确性的前瞻性国际研究。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2023 Dec 1;117(5):1145-1152. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.07.004. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
3
[Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) v 2.1: Overview and Critical Points].[前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)v2.1:概述与关键点]
J Korean Soc Radiol. 2023 Jan;84(1):75-91. doi: 10.3348/jksr.2022.0169. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
4
The combination of prostate MRI PI-RADS scoring system and a genomic classifier is associated with pelvic lymph node metastasis at the time of radical prostatectomy.前列腺 MRI PI-RADS 评分系统与基因组分类器的联合应用与根治性前列腺切除术后盆腔淋巴结转移相关。
Br J Radiol. 2023 Mar 1;96(1144):20220663. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20220663. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
5
Prostate cancer multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging visibility is a tumor-intrinsic phenomena.前列腺癌多参数磁共振成像的可见性是肿瘤内在的现象。
J Hematol Oncol. 2022 May 3;15(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13045-022-01268-6.
6
The Prognostic Value of PI-RADS Score in CyberKnife Ultra-Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer.PI-RADS评分在射波刀超分割放疗治疗局限性前列腺癌中的预后价值
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Mar 23;14(7):1613. doi: 10.3390/cancers14071613.
7
Prostate Cancer Radiogenomics-From Imaging to Molecular Characterization.前列腺癌放射组学——从成像到分子特征分析。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Sep 15;22(18):9971. doi: 10.3390/ijms22189971.
8
Comparison of approaches to transcriptomic analysis in multi-sampled tumors.多样本肿瘤中转录组分析方法的比较。
Brief Bioinform. 2021 Nov 5;22(6). doi: 10.1093/bib/bbab337.
9
Prostate cancer biomarkers and multiparametric MRI: is there a role for both in prostate cancer management?前列腺癌生物标志物与多参数磁共振成像:二者在前列腺癌管理中都能发挥作用吗?
Ther Adv Urol. 2021 Mar 2;13:1756287221997186. doi: 10.1177/1756287221997186. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
10
Genetic Landscape of Prostate Cancer Conspicuity on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review and Bioinformatic Analysis.多参数磁共振成像中前列腺癌显见性的遗传图谱:一项系统综述和生物信息学分析
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2020 Jul;20:37-47. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2020.06.006.

本文引用的文献

1
Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features Identify Aggressive Prostate Cancer at the Phenotypic and Transcriptomic Level.多参数磁共振成像特征可在表型和转录组水平识别侵袭性前列腺癌。
J Urol. 2018 Dec;200(6):1241-1249. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.06.041. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
2
Detection of Individual Prostate Cancer Foci via Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.通过多参数磁共振成像检测个体前列腺癌病灶。
Eur Urol. 2019 May;75(5):712-720. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.031. Epub 2018 Dec 1.
3
The Diverse Genomic Landscape of Clinically Low-risk Prostate Cancer.临床低危前列腺癌的多样基因组景观。
Eur Urol. 2018 Oct;74(4):444-452. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.05.014. Epub 2018 May 28.
4
NCCN Guidelines Updates: Prostate Cancer and Prostate Cancer Early Detection.NCCN 指南更新:前列腺癌和前列腺癌早期检测。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018 May;16(5S):620-623. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.0036.
5
Radiomic features from pretreatment biparametric MRI predict prostate cancer biochemical recurrence: Preliminary findings.基于预处理双参数 MRI 的放射组学特征可预测前列腺癌生化复发:初步研究结果
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Dec;48(6):1626-1636. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26178. Epub 2018 May 7.
6
Genes involved in prostate cancer progression determine MRI visibility.参与前列腺癌进展的基因决定了 MRI 的可见性。
Theranostics. 2018 Feb 12;8(7):1752-1765. doi: 10.7150/thno.23180. eCollection 2018.
7
MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis.MRI 靶向或标准活检用于前列腺癌诊断。
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 10;378(19):1767-1777. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801993. Epub 2018 Mar 18.
8
Cancer statistics, 2018.癌症统计数据,2018 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Jan;68(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21442. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
9
Performance of a Prostate Cancer Genomic Classifier in Predicting Metastasis in Men with Prostate-specific Antigen Persistence Postprostatectomy.前列腺特异性抗原持续存在于前列腺切除术后男性中预测转移的前列腺癌基因组分类器的性能。
Eur Urol. 2018 Jul;74(1):107-114. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.11.024. Epub 2017 Dec 10.
10
What Are We Missing? False-Negative Cancers at Multiparametric MR Imaging of the Prostate.我们遗漏了什么?前列腺多参数磁共振成像中的假阴性癌。
Radiology. 2018 Jan;286(1):186-195. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017152877. Epub 2017 Oct 20.

MRI 表型与前列腺癌基因组分类器的相关性:初步研究结果。

Correlation between MRI phenotypes and a genomic classifier of prostate cancer: preliminary findings.

机构信息

Abdominal Imaging Section and Nuclear Radiology Department, Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.

Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2019 Sep;29(9):4861-4870. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06114-x. Epub 2019 Mar 7.

DOI:10.1007/s00330-019-06114-x
PMID:30847589
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6684343/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We sought to evaluate the correlation between MRI phenotypes of prostate cancer as defined by PI-RADS v2 and the Decipher Genomic Classifier (used to estimate the risk of early metastases).

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective study included 72 nonconsecutive men with prostate cancer who underwent MRI before radical prostatectomy performed between April 2014 and August 2017 and whose MRI registered lesions were microdissected from radical prostatectomy specimens and then profiled using Decipher (89 lesions; 23 MRI invisible [PI-RADS v2 scores ≤ 2] and 66 MRI visible [PI-RADS v2 scores ≥ 3]). Linear regression analysis was used to assess clinicopathologic and MRI predictors of Decipher results; correlation coefficients (r) were used to quantify these associations. AUC was used to determine whether PI-RADS v2 could accurately distinguish between low-risk (Decipher score < 0.45) and intermediate-/high-risk (Decipher score ≥ 0.45) lesions.

RESULTS

MRI-visible lesions had higher Decipher scores than MRI-invisible lesions (mean difference 0.22; 95% CI 0.13, 0.32; p < 0.0001); most MRI-invisible lesions (82.6%) were low risk. PI-RADS v2 had moderate correlation with Decipher (r = 0.54) and had higher accuracy (AUC 0.863) than prostate cancer grade groups (AUC 0.780) in peripheral zone lesions (95% CI for difference 0.01, 0.15; p = 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

MRI phenotypes of prostate cancer are positively correlated with Decipher risk groups. Although PI-RADS v2 can accurately distinguish between lesions classified by Decipher as low or intermediate/high risk, some lesions classified as intermediate/high risk by Decipher are invisible on MRI.

KEY POINTS

• MRI phenotypes of prostate cancer as defined by PI-RADS v2 positively correlated with a genomic classifier that estimates the risk of early metastases. • Most but not all MRI-invisible lesions had a low risk for early metastases according to the genomic classifier. • MRI could be used in conjunction with genomic assays to identify lesions that may carry biological potential for early metastases.

摘要

目的

我们旨在评估前列腺癌的 MRI 表型(由 PI-RADS v2 定义)与 Decipher 基因组分类器(用于估计早期转移风险)之间的相关性。

方法

这是一项单中心、回顾性研究,纳入了 72 名连续非患者,他们于 2014 年 4 月至 2017 年 8 月期间接受了根治性前列腺切除术之前的 MRI 检查,且其 MRI 检出的病变在根治性前列腺切除标本中进行了微解剖,并使用 Decipher 进行了分析(89 个病变;23 个 MRI 不可见[PI-RADS v2 评分≤2]和 66 个 MRI 可见[PI-RADS v2 评分≥3])。线性回归分析用于评估临床病理和 MRI 预测因素与 Decipher 结果之间的关系;相关系数(r)用于量化这些关联。AUC 用于确定 PI-RADS v2 是否可以准确区分低风险(Decipher 评分<0.45)和中/高风险(Decipher 评分≥0.45)病变。

结果

MRI 可见病变的 Decipher 评分高于 MRI 不可见病变(平均差异 0.22;95%置信区间 0.13,0.32;p<0.0001);大多数 MRI 不可见病变(82.6%)为低风险。PI-RADS v2 与 Decipher 具有中度相关性(r=0.54),在周围带病变中比前列腺癌分级组(AUC 0.780)具有更高的准确性(AUC 0.863)(差异的 95%置信区间为 0.01,0.15;p=0.018)。

结论

前列腺癌的 MRI 表型与预测早期转移风险的基因组分类器呈正相关。虽然 PI-RADS v2 可以准确区分 Decipher 分类为低危或中/高危的病变,但根据基因组分类器,一些分类为中/高危的病变在 MRI 上不可见。