Department of Trauma Surgery, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Loestrasse 170, 7000, Chur, Switzerland.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019 Jul;139(7):943-949. doi: 10.1007/s00402-019-03154-2. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
Medial parapatellar or transpatellar ligament approaches are commonly used for nail osteosynthesis in tibia shaft fractures. The lower leg is normally in a hanging position to allow guide wire insertion and reaming of the tibia. However, this position complicates fracture reduction and retention, as well as image intensification throughout the procedure. A lateral parapatellar approach with the lower leg in a semi-extended, horizontal position has been previously described for proximal tibial fracture fixation. The purpose of the presented study was to share the lateral parapatellar approach technique used in our institution and to analyse its feasibility for tibia shaft fracture fixation when compared to a medial parapatellar and transpatellar incision technique.
All patients with tibial shaft fractures treated at our institution between 2009 and 2012 by intramedullary nailing through either a transpatellar, a medial parapatellar or a lateral parapatellar approach were reviewed. Demographics, injury pattern and the operative procedure, especially operation and fluoroscopy time, were analysed.
73 patients were enrolled into the study. Twenty-six patients were treated by use of a lateral parapatellar approach, whilst a transpatellar or a medial parapatellar approach was chosen in 29 and 18 cases, respectively. Patients' characteristics were similar regarding gender and body mass index. When compared to the transpatellar (126 ± 30 min) or the medial parapatellar approach (105 ± 29 min), surgical time was significantly shorter in the lateral parapatellar approach group (96 ± 29 min). Likewise, shorter image intensifier time was documented when a lateral parapatellar approach was chosen (211 ± 189 s) compared to the transpatellar (347 ± 204 s) or the medial parapatellar approach (241 ± 222 s).
The extra-articular semi-extended tibial nailing technique using a lateral parapatellar approach was associated with a significant decrease in time of surgery, while fluoroscopy time was shorter but not significantly different between the three groups.
经皮微创接骨板内固定术(MIPO)治疗胫骨骨折时,常采用经髌旁内侧或经髌旁入路。为便于导丝置入和胫骨扩髓,小腿通常呈悬挂位。但该体位会增加骨折复位和维持的难度,也会影响手术全程的透视效果。既往曾报道过一种改良的髌旁外侧入路,用于治疗胫骨近端骨折,其可使小腿保持轻度伸直位。本研究旨在介绍我们机构使用的改良髌旁外侧入路技术,并与髌旁内侧和经髌下入路技术进行比较,分析其在胫骨骨干骨折固定中的可行性。
回顾性分析 2009 年至 2012 年我院采用髓内钉治疗的胫骨骨干骨折患者。分析内容包括患者的一般资料、损伤类型和手术过程,特别是手术时间和透视时间。
本研究共纳入 73 例患者,其中 26 例采用改良髌旁外侧入路,29 例采用经髌旁内侧入路,18 例采用经髌下入路。3 组患者的性别和体重指数(BMI)无明显差异。与经髌旁内侧入路(105±29 min)和经髌下入路(126±30 min)相比,改良髌旁外侧入路组的手术时间明显缩短(96±29 min)。此外,改良髌旁外侧入路组的透视时间也明显缩短(211±189 s),而经髌旁内侧入路组和经髌下入路组的透视时间分别为(347±204 s)和(241±222 s)。
改良髌旁外侧入路行关节外胫骨交锁髓内钉固定术,可明显缩短手术时间,而透视时间虽有所缩短,但 3 组间无显著差异。