Department of System Design Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology, Keio University, Hirotaka Iijima, 3-14-1 Hiyoshi, Kohoku-ku, Yokohama, 223-8522, Japan.
Department of Physical Therapy, Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Clin Rheumatol. 2019 Jun;38(6):1721-1729. doi: 10.1007/s10067-019-04472-x. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
This study aimed to examine the interaction effect between ambulatory physical activity (PA) and varus thrust on knee pain in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA).
Subjects (n = 207; mean age: 73.1 years, 71.5% women) in orthopedic clinics with diagnosed knee OA (Kellgren/Lawrence grade ≥ 1) were enrolled in this 12-month observational cohort study. Participants underwent gait observation for varus thrust assessment and pedometer-based ambulatory PA measurements at baseline and 12-month follow-up. Knee pain intensity was assessed using the Japanese Knee Osteoarthritis Measure pain subscale as a primary outcome measure. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate ambulatory PA-thrust interaction on knee pain intensity.
Ninety-two subjects (mean age, 73.4 years; 68.5% women) completed the 12-month follow-up assessment. Baseline ambulatory PA-thrust interaction was significant (P = 0.017) in the cross-sectional analysis, adjusting for covariates, which yielded R = 0.310. Subgroup analysis showed that varus thrust was significantly associated with worse knee pain in subjects walking ≥ 5000 steps/day adjusting for covariates (beta: 7.94; 95% CI: 3.82, 12.1; P < 0.001) with a higher predictive ability (R = 0.664). In contrast, ambulatory PA-thrust interaction in the longitudinal analysis showed no significant association with knee pain changes.
Ambulatory PA interacted with varus thrust in the association with knee pain, as coexisting high ambulatory PA and varus thrust had the strongest association with higher knee pain. Maximal pain relief effects might be achieved when both ambulatory PA and varus thrust are treated simultaneously, rather than treating each separately.
本研究旨在探讨膝关节骨关节炎(OA)患者的动态体力活动(PA)与内翻推力之间的交互作用对膝关节疼痛的影响。
本研究纳入了 207 名在骨科诊所就诊的膝关节 OA 患者(Kellgren/Lawrence 分级≥1),进行了为期 12 个月的观察性队列研究。在基线和 12 个月随访时,通过步态观察评估内翻推力,并使用计步器测量动态 PA。使用日本膝关节骨关节炎评估量表的疼痛子量表作为主要结局指标评估膝关节疼痛强度。采用多元线性回归分析评估动态 PA-推力交互作用对膝关节疼痛强度的影响。
92 名受试者(平均年龄 73.4 岁,68.5%为女性)完成了 12 个月的随访评估。在调整协变量后,横断面分析显示基线动态 PA-推力交互作用具有统计学意义(P=0.017),R2 值为 0.310。亚组分析显示,在调整协变量后,对于每日行走步数≥5000 步的受试者,内翻推力与膝关节疼痛显著相关(β:7.94;95%CI:3.82,12.1;P<0.001),具有更高的预测能力(R2=0.664)。相比之下,纵向分析中动态 PA-推力交互作用与膝关节疼痛变化无显著关联。
动态 PA 与内翻推力在与膝关节疼痛的相关性中存在交互作用,共存的高动态 PA 和内翻推力与更高的膝关节疼痛有最强的相关性。当同时治疗动态 PA 和内翻推力时,可能会获得最大的疼痛缓解效果,而不是分别治疗。