Emergency Department, Sengkang General Hospital, 110 Sengkang East Way, Singapore, 544886, Singapore.
Emergency Medicine Department, National University Hospital, National University Health System, 9 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Level 4, Singapore, 119085, Singapore.
Intern Emerg Med. 2019 Aug;14(5):783-791. doi: 10.1007/s11739-019-02061-z. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
Diagnosing pyogenic liver abscess (PLA) in the emergency department (ED) is challenging due to its non-specific clinical presentation. We aim to identify predictors that aid in diagnosis of PLA in ED patients. This retrospective chart review included patients diagnosed with PLA in a tertiary hospital between January 2008 and December 2012. We compared the demographics, clinical characteristics, investigations and outcomes between patients with PLA diagnosed and missed in the ED. During the study period, 155 patients were admitted via the ED with a cause of death or discharge diagnosis of PLA. Mean age was 58.1 (standard deviation [SD] 15.8) years, with male predominance of 69.7%. There were 79.4% of patients with diagnosis of PLA missed in the ED. Fulfillment of SIRS criteria was associated with increased odds of diagnosing PLA in the ED (adjusted OR 3.20, 95% CI 1.03-9.92), while a higher SpO/FiO ratio was associated with decreased odds of a timely ED diagnosis (adjusted OR 0.993, 95% CI 0.988-0.998). Missed ED diagnosis of PLA did not result in significant differences in mortality or treatment failure (p = 0.939), and median length of stay (11 days [IQR 8-16] vs. 11 days [IQR 7-17], p = 0.48). Non-fulfillment of the SIRS criteria and a higher SpO/FiO ratio at ED presentation were associated with higher likelihood of missed diagnosis. Despite that, a missed diagnosis of PLA in the ED did not appear to affect outcomes.
在急诊科(ED)诊断化脓性肝脓肿(PLA)具有挑战性,因为其临床表现不具有特异性。我们旨在确定有助于 ED 患者 PLA 诊断的预测指标。本回顾性图表研究包括 2008 年 1 月至 2012 年 12 月期间在一家三级医院被诊断为 PLA 的患者。我们比较了 ED 中诊断和漏诊 PLA 的患者的人口统计学、临床特征、检查和结局。在研究期间,通过 ED 入院的 155 名患者的死亡原因或出院诊断为 PLA。平均年龄为 58.1 岁(标准差 [SD] 15.8),男性占 69.7%。有 79.4%的 ED 患者漏诊 PLA。满足 SIRS 标准与 ED 诊断 PLA 的几率增加相关(调整后的 OR 3.20,95%CI 1.03-9.92),而 SpO/FiO 比值较高与 ED 及时诊断 PLA 的几率降低相关(调整后的 OR 0.993,95%CI 0.988-0.998)。ED 漏诊 PLA 并未导致死亡率或治疗失败的显著差异(p=0.939),中位住院时间(11 天 [IQR 8-16] 与 11 天 [IQR 7-17],p=0.48)也无显著差异。ED 就诊时未满足 SIRS 标准和 SpO/FiO 比值较高与漏诊可能性较高相关。尽管如此,ED 漏诊 PLA 似乎并未影响结局。