• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

治疗 2 型糖尿病患者在两种口服抗糖尿病药物治疗反应不足后进行强化治疗时糖化血红蛋白的纵向变化。

Longitudinal changes in glycated haemoglobin following treatment intensification after inadequate response to two oral antidiabetic agents in patients with type 2 diabetes.

机构信息

Pharmacotherapy Outcomes Research Center and Department of Pharmacotherapy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.

Global Health Economics and Value Assessment, Sanofi Inc., Bridgewater, New Jersey.

出版信息

Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Jul;21(7):1725-1733. doi: 10.1111/dom.13694. Epub 2019 Apr 5.

DOI:10.1111/dom.13694
PMID:30848039
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6618330/
Abstract

AIMS

To identify change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) for 1 year after treatment intensification in patients with HbA1c >53 mmol/mol (7.0%) while on two classes of oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a regional health plan claims database for the period January 1, 2010 to March 31, 2017. Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) whose treatment was intensified with insulin, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist or a third OAD within 365 days of having HbA1c ≥53 mmol/mol (7.0%) on two OADs were included. The HbA1c trajectory for 1 year after intensification was estimated using a mixed-effects regression model.

RESULTS

The analysis included 1226 patients with a mean ± SD HbA1c at treatment intensification of 74.2 ± 18.7 mmol/mol (8.93 ± 1.7%). HbA1c was higher in the insulin group (74.2 mmol/mol) than in the non-insulin group (70.6 mmol/mol), as was the HbA1c decrease (P < 0.01) over the 1-year follow-up, particularly in patients with baseline HbA1c >9%. After intensification, insulin- and non-insulin-treated patients achieved an average change by month in HbA1c of -4.7 mmol/mol and -2.6 mmol/mol points, respectively. The analysis predicted HbA1c to be the lowest at 6 to 10 months post intensification, depending on intensification treatment and HbA1c at intensification; however, on average, HbA1c remained above 64.0 mmol/mol (8.0%).

CONCLUSION

In patients with T2DM, intensification following an HbA1c value ≥53 mmol/mol (7.0%) while on two OADs was associated with a significant improvement in glycaemic control. Patients intensified with insulin had a higher baseline HbA1c but greater HbA1c reduction than those intensified with a non-insulin agent. However, HbA1c remained above 64 mmol/mol (8.0%) overall. Additional opportunity exists to further intensify therapy to improve glycaemic control.

摘要

目的

在接受两种口服降糖药(OAD)治疗时,糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)>53mmol/mol(7.0%)的患者经治疗强化后,确定 1 年内 HbA1c 的变化情况。

材料和方法

对 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 3 月 31 日期间使用区域健康计划理赔数据库进行了回顾性队列研究。纳入在接受两种 OAD 治疗时,HbA1c≥53mmol/mol(7.0%)且在 365 天内接受胰岛素、胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂或第三种 OAD 强化治疗的 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)患者。使用混合效应回归模型估算强化治疗后 1 年内的 HbA1c 轨迹。

结果

该分析共纳入 1226 例患者,强化治疗时的平均 HbA1c±SD 为 74.2±18.7mmol/mol(8.93±1.7%)。胰岛素组的 HbA1c(74.2mmol/mol)高于非胰岛素组(70.6mmol/mol),并且在 1 年随访期间 HbA1c 下降幅度更大(P<0.01),基线 HbA1c>9%的患者尤其如此。强化治疗后,胰岛素治疗和非胰岛素治疗的患者 HbA1c 每月平均变化分别为-4.7mmol/mol 和-2.6mmol/mol。分析预测,根据强化治疗和强化治疗时的 HbA1c,HbA1c 在强化治疗后 6 至 10 个月达到最低水平;然而,平均而言,HbA1c 仍高于 64.0mmol/mol(8.0%)。

结论

在接受两种 OAD 治疗时,HbA1c 值≥53mmol/mol(7.0%)的 T2DM 患者强化治疗后,血糖控制得到显著改善。与接受非胰岛素药物强化治疗的患者相比,接受胰岛素强化治疗的患者基线 HbA1c 更高,但 HbA1c 降低幅度更大。然而,总体而言,HbA1c 仍高于 64mmol/mol(8.0%)。还有进一步强化治疗以改善血糖控制的机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b70/6618330/0b695327fc4c/DOM-21-1725-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b70/6618330/db86743bdb8c/DOM-21-1725-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b70/6618330/3752f387735a/DOM-21-1725-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b70/6618330/0b695327fc4c/DOM-21-1725-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b70/6618330/db86743bdb8c/DOM-21-1725-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b70/6618330/3752f387735a/DOM-21-1725-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b70/6618330/0b695327fc4c/DOM-21-1725-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Longitudinal changes in glycated haemoglobin following treatment intensification after inadequate response to two oral antidiabetic agents in patients with type 2 diabetes.治疗 2 型糖尿病患者在两种口服抗糖尿病药物治疗反应不足后进行强化治疗时糖化血红蛋白的纵向变化。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Jul;21(7):1725-1733. doi: 10.1111/dom.13694. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
2
Influence of Treatment Intensification on A1c in Patients with Suboptimally Controlled Type 2 Diabetes After 2 Oral Antidiabetic Agents.两种口服降糖药治疗后血糖控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者强化治疗对 A1c 的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Mar;25(3):314-322. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.3.314.
3
Clinical inertia in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with oral antidiabetic drugs: Results from a Japanese cohort study (JDDM53).口服降糖药治疗 2 型糖尿病患者的临床惰性:来自日本队列研究(JDDM53)的结果。
J Diabetes Investig. 2021 Mar;12(3):374-381. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13352. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
4
Long-term sustainability of glycaemic achievements with second-line antidiabetic therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes: A real-world study.2型糖尿病患者二线抗糖尿病治疗血糖控制效果的长期可持续性:一项真实世界研究。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Jul;20(7):1722-1731. doi: 10.1111/dom.13288. Epub 2018 Apr 15.
5
Real-world clinical outcomes following treatment intensification with GLP-1 RA, OADs or insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes on two oral agents (PATHWAY 2-OADs).在使用两种口服药物治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者中,GLP-1RA、OAD 或胰岛素强化治疗的真实世界临床结局(PATHWAY 2-OADs)。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 Dec;8(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001830.
6
Intensification patterns and the probability of HbA goal attainment in Type 2 diabetes mellitus: real-world evidence for the concept of 'intensification inertia'.2 型糖尿病强化模式与 HbA 达标概率:“强化惰性”概念的真实世界证据。
Diabet Med. 2020 Jul;37(7):1114-1124. doi: 10.1111/dme.13900. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
7
Slow Titration and Delayed Intensification of Basal Insulin Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.2 型糖尿病患者基础胰岛素的缓慢滴定和延迟强化。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Apr;24(4):390-400. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.17218. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
8
Treatment intensification for patients with type 2 diabetes and poor glycaemic control.强化治疗改善血糖控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者的预后
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016 Sep;18(9):892-8. doi: 10.1111/dom.12683. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
9
Clinical inertia in basal insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes - Results from a retrospective database study in Japan (JDDM 43).日本 2 型糖尿病基础胰岛素治疗患者的临床惰性:一项回顾性数据库研究结果(JDDM 43)。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 18;13(9):e0198160. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198160. eCollection 2018.
10
The effect of oral diabetes medications on glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in Asians in primary care: a retrospective cohort real-world data study.口服糖尿病药物对初级保健中亚洲人糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)的影响:一项回顾性队列真实世界数据研究。
BMC Med. 2022 Jan 26;20(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-02221-z.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of oral diabetes medications on glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in Asians in primary care: a retrospective cohort real-world data study.口服糖尿病药物对初级保健中亚洲人糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)的影响:一项回顾性队列真实世界数据研究。
BMC Med. 2022 Jan 26;20(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-02221-z.

本文引用的文献

1
CONSENSUS STATEMENT BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS AND AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY ON THE COMPREHENSIVE TYPE 2 DIABETES MANAGEMENT ALGORITHM - 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.美国临床内分泌医师协会和美国内分泌学会关于2型糖尿病综合管理算法的共识声明 - 2018执行摘要
Endocr Pract. 2018 Jan;24(1):91-120. doi: 10.4158/CS-2017-0153. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
2
8. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: .8. 血糖治疗的药物治疗方法: 。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jan;41(Suppl 1):S73-S85. doi: 10.2337/dc18-S008.
3
Trajectories of Glycemic Change in a National Cohort of Adults With Previously Controlled Type 2 Diabetes.
既往血糖控制良好的成年2型糖尿病患者全国队列中的血糖变化轨迹。
Med Care. 2017 Nov;55(11):956-964. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000807.
4
Glycated haemoglobin A1c as a risk factor of cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality in diabetic and non-diabetic populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.糖化血红蛋白A1c作为糖尿病和非糖尿病人群心血管结局及全因死亡率的危险因素:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 31;7(7):e015949. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015949.
5
Is insulin the preferred treatment for HbA1c >9%?对于糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)>9%的患者,胰岛素是首选治疗药物吗?
J Diabetes. 2017 Sep;9(9):814-816. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.12575. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
6
Diabetes Complications Severity Index (DCSI)-Update and ICD-10 translation.糖尿病并发症严重程度指数(DCSI)-更新与国际疾病分类第十版(ICD-10)翻译
J Diabetes Complications. 2017 Jun;31(6):1007-1013. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2017.02.018. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
7
Comparative Effectiveness of Rapid-Acting Insulins in Adults with Diabetes.成人糖尿病患者速效胰岛素的疗效比较。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Mar;23(3):291-298. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.3.291.
8
Change in HbA1c associated with treatment intensification among patients with type 2 diabetes and poor glycemic control.2型糖尿病且血糖控制不佳患者中糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)的变化与治疗强化相关。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 May;33(5):853-858. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1292231. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
9
Comparative Effectiveness of Diabetic Oral Medications Among HIV-Infected and HIV-Uninfected Veterans.糖尿病口服药物在感染HIV和未感染HIV退伍军人中的比较疗效
Diabetes Care. 2017 Feb;40(2):218-225. doi: 10.2337/dc16-0718. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
10
Intensification of Diabetes Therapy and Time Until A1C Goal Attainment Among Patients With Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes Who Fail Metformin Monotherapy Within a Large Integrated Health System.在一个大型综合医疗体系中,对于新诊断为 2 型糖尿病且服用二甲双胍单药治疗失败的患者,强化糖尿病治疗与达到 A1C 目标的时间。
Diabetes Care. 2016 Sep;39(9):1527-34. doi: 10.2337/dc16-0227. Epub 2016 Aug 12.