School of Geographical and Earth Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, G12 8QQ, UK.
School of Geographical and Earth Sciences, University of Glasgow, Room 211, Main Building, East Quad, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Apr;26(12):12491-12504. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04678-1. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
Understanding of the sources, fate, and impact of microplastics (MPs, < 5 mm) remains limited, particularly in freshwater environments, while limited comparability across available surveys hinders adequate monitoring and risk assessment of these contaminants. Here, the distribution of microscopic debris in an urban river close to the marine environment in the West of Scotland was investigated to assess concentration and distribution of primary and secondary MPs. Also, the efficiency of light and scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive spectroscopy (SEM-EDS) was evaluated for characterisation and quantification of MPs sized 2.8 mm-11 μm. Bank sediment samples were collected twice from the River Kelvin in Glasgow and were size-fractionated and processed for extraction of MPs by density separation. Sample MPs spiking and use of procedural blanks allowed the influence of processing on field data quality to be considered. Total abundances were 161-432 MPs kg dry sediment, with fibres as the dominant type, comprising > 88% of total counts. Nevertheless, fibres in blanks suggest potential contributions from atmospheric contamination. Moreover, fibres concentrated mainly in fractions < 0.09 mm suggesting that their fate may be influenced by drivers of fine sediment dynamics in rivers. While no primary MPs were observed, metallic and glass pellets were present in high abundances in settled material and could be easily misidentified by visual inspection, demonstrating that compositional analysis is needed to avoid analytical errors from MP misidentification and overestimation. SEM-EDS allowed for a quick screening of plastic vs non-plastic pellets and improved identification of smaller fragments, whereas more advanced techniques are needed for proper identification of fibres. This study is the first to report on MPs in freshwater rivers in Scotland and suggests that diffuse sources of pollution may be delivering secondary MPs to the river. Their sources, fate, and risk in these systems will thus warrant further attention.
对微塑料(MPs,<5 毫米)的来源、归宿和影响的了解仍然有限,特别是在淡水环境中,而现有调查之间的可比性有限,阻碍了对这些污染物的充分监测和风险评估。在这里,研究了苏格兰西部靠近海洋环境的一条城市河流中微观碎片的分布,以评估初级和次级 MPs 的浓度和分布。此外,还评估了光和扫描电子显微镜与能量色散光谱(SEM-EDS)的效率,用于对 2.8 毫米-11 微米大小的 MPs 进行特征描述和量化。从格拉斯哥的 Kelvin 河采集了两次河岸沉积物样本,并对其进行了大小分级,通过密度分离提取 MPs。通过 MPs 加标和使用程序空白样,考虑了处理对现场数据质量的影响。总丰度为 161-432 MPs·kg 干沉积物,纤维是主要类型,占总计数的>88%。然而,空白样中的纤维表明可能存在大气污染的贡献。此外,纤维主要集中在<0.09 毫米的分数中,这表明它们的归宿可能受到河流细颗粒动力学驱动因素的影响。虽然没有观察到初级 MPs,但在沉降物质中存在大量的金属和玻璃颗粒,很容易通过肉眼观察错误识别,这表明需要进行成分分析,以避免因 MP 误识别和高估而导致的分析错误。SEM-EDS 允许快速筛选塑料与非塑料颗粒,并提高对较小碎片的识别能力,而对于纤维的正确识别则需要更先进的技术。本研究首次报道了苏格兰淡水河流中的 MPs,并表明弥散污染源可能正在将次级 MPs 输送到河流中。因此,这些系统中的 MPs 来源、归宿和风险将需要进一步关注。