• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

诊断相关分组(DRGs)的替代方案。一种具有临床意义且能降低成本的方法。

An alternative to DRGs. A clinically meaningful and cost-reducing approach.

作者信息

Siegel C, Alexander M J, Lin S, Laska E

出版信息

Med Care. 1986 May;24(5):407-17. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198605000-00004.

DOI:10.1097/00005650-198605000-00004
PMID:3084889
Abstract

A statistical methodology based on the Cox proportional hazards model (a survival time analysis method), an alternative to the approach underlying DRGs, is presented. The method is used to obtain an estimate of the length-of-stay (LOS) distribution of a patient incorporating either patient-specific or hospital variables. A percentile of the distribution chosen to minimize prediction error serves as the assigned LOS. Absolute deviation is used as the loss function both to determine the choice of a predicted LOS and to examine how well the scheme works. Multiple assignment schemes may also be developed from this approach. The results of the method, tested on a national probability sample of 4,608 psychiatric patients treated in psychiatric units of general hospitals, suggest that with respect to average absolute deviation, the proposed methodology may provide a scheme that is superior to the present DRG scheme. For the sample, the average percent improvement obtained using the median of the estimated LOS distribution as the predicted LOS over the sample mean of the DRG group is 19%. A two assignment strategy results in average improvements over DRGs of 43%.

摘要

本文提出了一种基于Cox比例风险模型(一种生存时间分析方法)的统计方法,该方法可替代DRGs所依据的方法。该方法用于获取纳入患者特定变量或医院变量的患者住院时间(LOS)分布的估计值。选择分布的一个百分位数以最小化预测误差作为指定的LOS。绝对偏差用作损失函数,既用于确定预测LOS的选择,也用于检验该方案的效果。也可以从这种方法开发多种分配方案。该方法的结果在对4608名在综合医院精神科接受治疗的精神病患者的全国概率样本上进行了测试,结果表明,就平均绝对偏差而言,所提出的方法可能提供一种优于当前DRG方案的方案。对于该样本,使用估计的LOS分布的中位数作为预测LOS相对于DRG组样本均值获得的平均改进百分比为19%。一种双分配策略导致相对于DRGs的平均改进为43%。

相似文献

1
An alternative to DRGs. A clinically meaningful and cost-reducing approach.诊断相关分组(DRGs)的替代方案。一种具有临床意义且能降低成本的方法。
Med Care. 1986 May;24(5):407-17. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198605000-00004.
2
Diagnosis-related groups for mental disorders, alcoholism, and drug abuse: evaluation and alternatives.精神障碍、酗酒和药物滥用的诊断相关分组:评估与替代方案
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1984 May;35(5):452-5. doi: 10.1176/ps.35.5.452.
3
Psychiatric DRGs: more risk for hospitals?
J Health Care Mark. 1989 Sep;9(3):67-71.
4
DRGs in psychiatry. An empirical evaluation.精神病学中的疾病诊断相关分组。一项实证评估。
Med Care. 1984 Jul;22(7):597-610. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198407000-00002.
5
A plan for prospective payment for inpatient psychiatric care.一项住院精神科护理的前瞻性支付计划。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1985 Jul;36(7):775-6. doi: 10.1176/ps.36.7.775.
6
Prospective payment for psychiatric hospitalization: context and background.精神科住院治疗的前瞻性支付:背景与环境
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1984 May;35(5):447-51. doi: 10.1176/ps.35.5.447.
7
Challenges in bringing exempt psychiatric services under a prospective payment system.将豁免的精神科服务纳入前瞻性付费系统所面临的挑战。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1985 Jul;36(7):764-9. doi: 10.1176/ps.36.7.764.
8
Diagnosis-related groups and general hospital psychiatry: the APA Study.诊断相关分组与综合医院精神病学:美国精神病学协会研究
Am J Psychiatry. 1986 Feb;143(2):131-9. doi: 10.1176/ajp.143.2.131.
9
Prospective payment for psychiatric hospitalization: questions and issues.精神科住院治疗的前瞻性支付:问题与事项。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1984 May;35(5):460-4. doi: 10.1176/ps.35.5.460.
10
Prospective payment.前瞻性支付
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1984 Oct;35(10):1043. doi: 10.1176/ps.35.10.1043.

引用本文的文献

1
Marginal revenue and length of stay in inpatient psychiatry.住院精神病学中的边际收益与住院时间
Eur J Health Econ. 2016 Sep;17(7):897-910. doi: 10.1007/s10198-015-0735-4. Epub 2015 Oct 7.
2
Alternatives to DRGs: research issues.
Psychiatr Q. 1985 Fall-Winter;57(3-4):203-16. doi: 10.1007/BF01277615.
3
Linear programming models for cost reimbursement.成本报销的线性规划模型
Health Serv Res. 1989 Aug;24(3):329-47.