Kwan Bethany M, Fernald Douglas, Ferrarone Peter, Loskutova Natalia, Summers Holtrop Jodi, Staton Elizabeth W, Westfall John M
From the Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO (BMK, DF, PF, JSH, EWS, JMW); American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network, Leawood, KS (NL).
J Am Board Fam Med. 2019 Mar-Apr;32(2):136-145. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.02.180109.
The purpose of this project was to evaluate the real-world usability and usefulness of a revised version of the published Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality "Improving Your Office Testing Process" toolkit, designed to help primary care practices standardize and systematize laboratory testing processes.
We used a multiple case study approach to evaluate toolkit implementation in 2 primary care practices with existing quality improvement (QI) infrastructure. We collected qualitative data at baseline, midpoint (3 to 4 weeks), and follow-up (7 to 8 weeks postimplementation). Data included key informant interviews and practice site observations. Nineteen clinicians and staff participated in the interviews. Thematic analysis was used to summarize (1) how practices used the toolkit for guiding lab testing process improvement (usefulness), and (2) ease of use and practice experience with using the toolkit (usability).
The toolkit was perceived as easy to use and easy to follow step by step. Two components of the toolkit were particularly useful: guidance on data gathering to inform quality improvement and tools for effective practice-patient communication. The toolkit's practice and patient assessments facilitated practice-specific insights into the lab processes considered most harmful to patients and informed improvement activities.
The usability and usefulness of the toolkit were related to the characteristics of the toolkit itself (adaptability, simplicity, and design quality and packaging, and guidance in planning) and practice processes (presence of practice champions and implementation teams). In a set of 2 practices in which laboratory testing process improvement was a high priority and where well-established QI infrastructure exists, the toolkit was easy to use with little technical assistance.
本项目旨在评估已发布的医疗保健研究与质量局“改进您的办公室检测流程”工具包修订版在现实世界中的可用性和实用性,该工具包旨在帮助初级保健机构规范和系统化实验室检测流程。
我们采用多案例研究方法,对2个具备现有质量改进(QI)基础设施的初级保健机构中工具包的实施情况进行评估。我们在基线、中点(3至4周)和随访(实施后7至8周)收集定性数据。数据包括关键 informant 访谈和实践场所观察。19名临床医生和工作人员参与了访谈。采用主题分析来总结:(1)各机构如何使用该工具包来指导实验室检测流程改进(实用性),以及(2)使用该工具包的易用性和实践体验(可用性)。
该工具包被认为易于使用且易于逐步遵循。该工具包的两个组成部分特别有用:用于为质量改进提供信息的数据收集指南以及有效的医患沟通工具。该工具包的实践和患者评估有助于对被认为对患者危害最大的实验室流程形成特定于实践的见解,并为改进活动提供信息。
该工具包的可用性和实用性与工具包本身的特性(适应性、简单性、设计质量和包装以及规划指南)和实践流程(实践倡导者和实施团队的存在)有关。在2个将实验室检测流程改进列为高度优先事项且存在完善的QI基础设施的机构中,该工具包在几乎无需技术援助的情况下易于使用。