Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Nuclear Medicine, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany.
Werner Siemens Imaging Center, Department of Preclinical Imaging and Radiopharmacy, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany.
J Nucl Med. 2019 Oct;60(10):1359-1365. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.224543. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
Biochemical recurrence (BCR) after prostate cancer surgery is common, even after additional salvage radiotherapy. BCR might be explained by target miss. Improved diagnostic accuracy provided by PET could potentially circumvent this therapeutic gap. Therefore, we evaluated consecutive Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT, C-choline PET/CT, and standard CT imaging in the same patient with regard to TNM-stage migration and accordingly adapted curative radiotherapy options including ablative treatment of oligometastases ( ≤ 5). The cost efficacy of PET- versus CT-based treatment was also calculated. The prospective register database (064/2013BO1) was retrospectively searched for patients fulfilling the following 3 inclusion criteria: BCR after radical prostatectomy (pT2-pT4 pN0-pN1 cM0, postoperative radiotherapy allowed); C-choline PET/CT, Ga-PSMA PET/CT, and diagnostic CT performed within 24 h; and available clinical data. Ten treatment routines were defined according to current practice. Furthermore, intention-to-treat and treatment-related costs depending on the shift of TNM stage after imaging were analyzed. Eighty-three patients were eligible (median prostate-specific antigen level, 1.9 ng/mL). Both PET examinations led to concordant results in 72% of patients, whereas the concordance of TNM staging between Ga-PSMA PET and diagnostic CT was only 36%. Incorrect staging would lead to "wrong" treatment and therefore to additional costs. A Ga-PSMA PET study would be cost-effective if additional costs do not exceed €3,844 ($4,312) (vs. CT). The number needed to image was 2 (for CT) and 4 (for C-choline PET) to avoid 1 incorrect treatment. In addition, Ga-PSMA PET staging enabled new curative options in half the patients with previous radiotherapy who otherwise receive palliative androgen deprivation therapy. Ga-PSMA PET/CT is cost-effective in all patients with regard to avoidance of incorrect treatment. It enabled new curative options for patients with previous radiotherapy who are usually treated palliatively. Therefore, Ga-PSMA PET/CT staging should become standard for BCR after surgery with or without radiotherapy.
前列腺癌手术后的生化复发(BCR)很常见,即使在接受额外的挽救性放疗后也是如此。BCR 可能是由于目标错过造成的。PET 提供的诊断准确性的提高有可能避免这种治疗差距。因此,我们评估了同一位患者的连续 Ga-前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)PET/CT、C-胆碱 PET/CT 和标准 CT 成像,以评估 TNM 分期迁移,并相应地调整了包括寡转移(≤5 个)消融治疗在内的治愈性放疗方案。还计算了基于 PET 和 CT 的治疗的成本效益。从 2013 年 064/BO1 前瞻性登记数据库中检索符合以下 3 项纳入标准的患者:根治性前列腺切除术后的 BCR(pT2-pT4 pN0-pN1 cM0,允许术后放疗);在 24 小时内进行 C-胆碱 PET/CT、Ga-PSMA PET/CT 和诊断性 CT;以及可获得的临床数据。根据当前实践定义了 10 种治疗方案。此外,还分析了基于成像后 TNM 分期变化的意向治疗和治疗相关成本。83 名患者符合条件(中位前列腺特异性抗原水平为 1.9ng/mL)。两种 PET 检查在 72%的患者中结果一致,而 Ga-PSMA PET 与诊断性 CT 的 TNM 分期一致性仅为 36%。错误的分期会导致“错误”的治疗,从而产生额外的成本。如果额外成本不超过 3844 欧元(4312 美元)(与 CT 相比),则 Ga-PSMA PET 研究具有成本效益。为了避免 1 次错误的治疗,需要对 CT 进行 2 次成像,对 C-胆碱 PET 进行 4 次成像。此外,Ga-PSMA PET 分期为以前接受过放疗的一半患者提供了新的治愈选择,否则这些患者将接受姑息性雄激素剥夺治疗。对于所有患者来说,Ga-PSMA PET/CT 避免了错误的治疗,因此具有成本效益。它为以前接受过放疗且通常接受姑息性治疗的患者提供了新的治愈选择。因此,Ga-PSMA PET/CT 分期应成为手术或手术后有无放疗的生化复发的标准。