Francolini G, Desideri I, Detti B, Di Cataldo V, Masi L, Caramia G, Visani L, Terziani F, Muntoni C, Lo Russo M, Loi M, Livi L
Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla n.3, 50134, Florence, Italy.
CyberKnife Center, Istituto Fiorentino di Cura ed Assistenza, Via del Pergolino, 4/6B, 50139, Florence, Italy.
Cancer Treat Res Commun. 2019;19:100124. doi: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2019.100124. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
Urothelial cancer is one of the most common malignancies; after relapse or disease progression available therapeutic options are limited. We analyze efficacy and toxicity of local treatment on metastases using stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in selected patients with oligometastatic disease from urothelial cancer. A significant percentage of treated lesions achieved local control, with a promising overall response rate.
to analyze efficacy and toxicity of local treatment on metastases using stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in selected patients with oligometastatic disease from urothelial cancer.
Data from clinical records of 19 patients treated in our institution since May 2011 to October 2017 with SBRT for oligometastatic/oligoprogressive urothelial carcinoma were retrospectively collected. Clinical outcomes in terms of local control (LC), response rate, symptoms control, progression free and overall survival (PFS and OS), and adverse events were analyzed and reported.
Nineteen patients were treated on 25 metastatic lesions; 5 of them received treatment on multiple sites. After an average follow up of 11.5 months, LC was achieved in 17 lesions (68%) and there was no local recurrence in lesions with complete or partial response. OS was 13.8 months. Adverse events were reported only in 3 patients (5 overall events). No late toxicity was reported.
An approach consisting in SBRT for local treatment of oligometastatic or persistent disease can be effective and safe in selected patients. Prospective studies are needed, to find correct selection criteria and optimal dose and fractionation.
尿路上皮癌是最常见的恶性肿瘤之一;复发或疾病进展后可用的治疗选择有限。我们分析了立体定向体部放疗(SBRT)对选定的寡转移尿路上皮癌患者转移灶的局部治疗疗效和毒性。相当比例的治疗病灶实现了局部控制,总体缓解率令人鼓舞。
分析立体定向体部放疗(SBRT)对选定的寡转移尿路上皮癌患者转移灶的局部治疗疗效和毒性。
回顾性收集了2011年5月至2017年10月在我院接受SBRT治疗寡转移/寡进展性尿路上皮癌的19例患者的临床记录数据。分析并报告了局部控制(LC)、缓解率、症状控制、无进展生存期和总生存期(PFS和OS)以及不良事件方面的临床结果。
19例患者的25个转移灶接受了治疗;其中5例在多个部位接受了治疗。平均随访11.5个月后,17个病灶(68%)实现了局部控制,完全或部分缓解的病灶未出现局部复发。总生存期为13.8个月。仅3例患者(共5起事件)报告了不良事件。未报告晚期毒性。
对于选定的患者,采用SBRT对寡转移或持续性疾病进行局部治疗的方法可能有效且安全。需要进行前瞻性研究,以找到正确的选择标准以及最佳剂量和分割方案。