• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

严重程度与结果评估评分:一种用于正颌外科审计的有用工具。

Severity and Outcome Assessment score: a useful tool for auditing orthognathic surgery.

作者信息

Geddes A, Laverick S, McBride A, McIntyre G T

机构信息

University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff.

Ninewells Hospital, Dundee.

出版信息

Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Apr;57(3):246-250. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2018.10.291. Epub 2019 Mar 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.bjoms.2018.10.291
PMID:30851998
Abstract

Many indices and scoring systems exist for assessing skeletal patterns and malocclusion but none have been universally adopted by teams providing orthognathic surgery in the UK. Using a standardised objective measure of a patient's condition is important both for service provision, treatment allocation, and other clinical governance domains. The Severity and Outcome Assessment tool (SOA) developed by the British Orthodontic Society (BOS) and British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (BAOMS) provides a standardised method of assessing patients throughout the orthognathic pathway and lends itself to case selection, resource allocation and auditing treatment outcomes. The SOA uses 7 cephalometric skeletal, dental and soft tissue measures to produce an overall score.The SOA has been used by the current NHS Tayside orthognathic team since August 2006 to audit treatment outcomes. While we recognise that cephalometric analysis forms only one part of orthognathic treatment we believe that having an objective measure on which to assess treatment is useful. We present our experience of using this quick, simple and reproducible tool in auditing orthognathic treatment outcomes.

摘要

有许多指标和评分系统可用于评估骨骼形态和错颌畸形,但在英国提供正颌外科手术的团队中,没有一个被普遍采用。使用标准化的客观指标来衡量患者的病情,对于服务提供、治疗分配以及其他临床管理领域都很重要。由英国正畸学会(BOS)和英国口腔颌面外科医生协会(BAOMS)开发的严重程度和结果评估工具(SOA),提供了一种在整个正颌治疗过程中评估患者的标准化方法,适用于病例选择、资源分配以及审核治疗结果。SOA使用7项头影测量骨骼、牙齿和软组织指标得出一个总分。自2006年8月以来,目前泰赛德国民保健服务(NHS)正颌团队一直使用SOA来审核治疗结果。虽然我们认识到头影测量分析只是正颌治疗的一部分,但我们认为拥有一个用于评估治疗的客观指标是有用的。我们介绍了使用这个快速简单且可重复的工具审核正颌治疗结果的经验。

相似文献

1
Severity and Outcome Assessment score: a useful tool for auditing orthognathic surgery.严重程度与结果评估评分:一种用于正颌外科审计的有用工具。
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Apr;57(3):246-250. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2018.10.291. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
2
National British Orthodontic Society (BOS) Orthognathic Audit 2017-2018.英国国家正畸学会(BOS)2017 - 2018年正颌手术审计
J Orthod. 2019 Dec;46(4):287-296. doi: 10.1177/1465312519879934. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
3
Compliance with the minimum dataset of the British Orthodontic Society/British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons for record keeping for orthognathic patients: retrospective comparative multicentre audit.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Oct;51(7):639-43. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2013.02.006. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
4
Oral health-related quality of life following orthognathic surgery for class III correction its relationship with cephalometric changes.正颌手术治疗 III 类错颌畸形的口腔健康相关生活质量及其与头影测量变化的关系。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Nov;48(11):1434-1439. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2019.03.899. Epub 2019 May 20.
5
Golden Proportion Analysis of Dental-Skeletal Patterns of Class II and III Patients Pre and Post Orthodontic-orthognathic Treatment.正畸-正颌联合治疗前后II类和III类患者牙-骨骼模式的黄金比例分析
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016 Sep 1;17(9):728-733. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1920.
6
Orthognathic Surgery for Correction of Skeletal Class III Malocclusion Using Osseointegrated Dental Implants: A Clinical Case Letter.使用骨整合牙种植体矫正Ⅲ类骨性错牙合畸形的正颌外科手术:一例临床病例报告
J Oral Implantol. 2020 Apr 1;46(2):146-152. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-19-00113.
7
Retreatment of a patient: Orthognathic surgery-first approach with customized lingual appliances combined with miniplate anchorage.患者的再治疗:正颌手术-首先采用定制舌侧矫治器结合微型板锚固。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019 Nov;156(5):675-684. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.05.028.
8
Outcome of photographic evaluation of facial appearance in orthognathic surgery: how does it correlate with planning of treatment and patient-reported outcome?正颌外科中面部外观的影像学评估结果:它与治疗计划及患者报告的结果有何关联?
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 May;57(4):345-351. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2018.12.019. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
9
The reliability of a surgery-first orthognathic approach without presurgical orthodontic treatment for skeletal class III dentofacial deformity.对于骨性III类牙颌面畸形,不进行术前正畸治疗的手术优先正颌治疗方法的可靠性。
Ann Plast Surg. 2015 Mar;74(3):333-41. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e318295dcce.
10
Can a surgery-first orthognathic approach reduce the total treatment time?手术优先的正颌治疗方法能否缩短总治疗时间?
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Apr;46(4):473-482. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.12.006. Epub 2016 Dec 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Starting a Swedish national quality registry for orthognathic surgery: a tool for auditing fundamentals of care.启动瑞典正颌外科国家质量登记系统:护理基础审核工具。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Dec 9;22(1):588. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02568-6.