Suppr超能文献

低剂量联合化疗(S-1 加奥沙利铂)与高龄脆弱转移性结直肠癌患者的全剂量单药治疗(S-1)(NORDIC9):一项随机、开放标签的 2 期试验。

Reduced-dose combination chemotherapy (S-1 plus oxaliplatin) versus full-dose monotherapy (S-1) in older vulnerable patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (NORDIC9): a randomised, open-label phase 2 trial.

机构信息

Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

Department of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 May;4(5):376-388. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30041-X. Epub 2019 Mar 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Older or vulnerable patients with metastatic colorectal cancer are seldom included in randomised trials. The multicentre NORDIC9 trial evaluated reduced-dose combination chemotherapy compared with full-dose monotherapy in older, vulnerable patients.

METHODS

This randomised, open-label phase 2 trial was done in 23 Nordic oncology clinics and included patients aged 70 years or older with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer who were not candidates for full-dose combination chemotherapy. Patients were block randomised (1:1) using a web-based tool to full-dose S-1 (30 mg/m orally twice daily on days 1-14 every 3 weeks) followed by second-line treatment at progression with irinotecan (250 mg/m intravenously on day 1 every 3 weeks or 180 mg/m intravenously on day 1 every 2 weeks) or reduced-dose combination chemotherapy with S-1 (20 mg/m orally twice daily on days 1-14) and oxaliplatin (100 mg/m intravenously on day 1 every 3 weeks) followed by second-line treatment at progression with S-1 (20 mg/m orally twice daily on days 1-14) and irinotecan (180 mg/m intravenously on day 1 every 3 weeks). Use of bevacizumab (7·5 mg/kg intravenously on day 1 of each cycle) was optional. Treatment allocation was not masked and randomisation was stratified for institution and bevacizumab. The primary outcome was progression-free survival. Survival analyses were by intention to treat and safety analyses were done on the treated population. This trial is registered with EudraCT, number 2014-000394-39, and is closed to new participants.

FINDINGS

From March 9, 2015, to Oct 11, 2017, 160 patients with a median age of 78 years (IQR 76-81) were randomly assigned to full-dose monotherapy (n=83) or reduced-dose combination chemotherapy (n=77). At data cutoff (Sept 1, 2018; median follow-up 23·8 months [IQR 18·8-30·9]), 81 (98%) patients in the full-dose monotherapy group and 71 (92%) patients in the reduced-dose combination group had progressed or died. Median progression-free survival was significantly longer with reduced-dose combination chemotherapy (6·2 months [95% CI 5·3-8·3]) than with full-dose monotherapy (5·3 months [4·1-6·8]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·72 [95% CI 0·52-0·99]; p=0·047). Toxicity was evaluated in 157 patients who received treatment. Significantly more patients in the full-dose monotherapy group (51 [62%] of 82 patients) experienced at least one grade 3-4 adverse event than in the reduced-dose combination group (32 [43%] of 75 patients; p=0·014). Grade 3-4 diarrhoea (12 [15%] vs two [3%]; p=0·018), fatigue (ten [12%] vs three [4%]; p=0·083), and dehydration (five [6%] vs none; p=0·060) were more frequent in the full-dose monotherapy group than in the reduced-dose combination group. Treatment-related deaths occurred in three patients during first-line treatment and three patients during second-line treatment (two in the full-dose monotherapy group vs one in the reduced-dose combination group in both cases).

INTERPRETATION

Reduced-dose combination chemotherapy with S-1 and oxaliplatin for older, vulnerable patients with metastatic colorectal cancer was more effective and resulted in less toxicity than full-dose monotherapy with S-1. Reduced-dose combination chemotherapy could be a preferred treatment for this population.

FUNDING

Taiho Pharmaceuticals, Nordic Group, the Danish Cancer Society, the Swedish Cancer Society, Academy of Geriatric Research (AgeCare), and Region of Southern Denmark.

摘要

背景

转移性结直肠癌的老年或脆弱患者很少被纳入随机试验。多中心 NORDIC9 试验评估了在老年、脆弱的患者中,与全剂量单药治疗相比,减少剂量的联合化疗。

方法

这是一项在 23 个北欧肿瘤学诊所进行的随机、开放标签的 2 期试验,纳入了之前未经治疗的转移性结直肠癌且不适合全剂量联合化疗的年龄 70 岁或以上的患者。患者使用基于网络的工具按 1:1 进行随机分组,接受全剂量 S-1(30mg/m2,每日两次,第 1-14 天,每 3 周一次),然后在疾病进展时使用伊立替康(250mg/m2,静脉注射,每 3 周一次,或 180mg/m2,静脉注射,每 2 周一次)或 S-1(20mg/m2,每日两次,第 1-14 天)和奥沙利铂(100mg/m2,静脉注射,第 1 天,每 3 周一次)的减少剂量联合化疗,然后在疾病进展时使用伊立替康(180mg/m2,静脉注射,每 3 周一次)和 S-1(20mg/m2,每日两次,第 1-14 天)进行二线治疗。贝伐珠单抗(7.5mg/kg,每周期第 1 天静脉注射)的使用是可选的。治疗分配未进行屏蔽,随机分组按机构和贝伐珠单抗分层。主要结局是无进展生存期。生存分析按意向治疗进行,安全性分析在治疗人群中进行。该试验在 EudraCT 注册,编号为 2014-000394-39,目前已不再招募新的参与者。

结果

从 2015 年 3 月 9 日至 2017 年 10 月 11 日,中位年龄为 78 岁(IQR:76-81)的 160 名患者被随机分配至全剂量单药治疗组(n=83)或减少剂量联合化疗组(n=77)。在数据截止日期(2018 年 9 月 1 日;中位随访 23.8 个月[IQR:18.8-30.9])时,全剂量单药治疗组 81 名(98%)和减少剂量联合化疗组 71 名(92%)患者疾病进展或死亡。减少剂量联合化疗组的无进展生存期显著长于全剂量单药治疗组(6.2 个月[95%CI:5.3-8.3] vs. 5.3 个月[4.1-6.8];风险比[HR]:0.72[95%CI:0.52-0.99];p=0.047)。在接受治疗的 157 名患者中评估了毒性。全剂量单药治疗组中(82 名患者中有 51 名[62%])发生至少 1 次 3-4 级不良事件的患者明显多于减少剂量联合化疗组(75 名患者中有 32 名[43%];p=0.014)。全剂量单药治疗组中(15%比 3%;p=0.018)和减少剂量联合化疗组中(12%比 2%;p=0.083)更频繁发生 3-4 级腹泻、疲劳(12%比 4%;p=0.083)和脱水(6%比 0%;p=0.060)。在一线治疗期间,3 名患者发生治疗相关死亡,在二线治疗期间,3 名患者发生治疗相关死亡(全剂量单药治疗组 2 例,减少剂量联合化疗组 1 例)。

结论

对于年龄较大、脆弱的转移性结直肠癌患者,与全剂量单药 S-1 相比,S-1 和奥沙利铂的减少剂量联合化疗更有效,且毒性更小。减少剂量的联合化疗可能是该人群的首选治疗方法。

资助

Taiho 制药、北欧集团、丹麦癌症协会、瑞典癌症协会、老年学研究学院(AgeCare)和南丹麦地区。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验