Suppr超能文献

超声引导双侧竖脊肌肌间阻滞与鞘内吗啡用于剖宫产术后镇痛的随机对照试验。

Ultrasound-guided bilateral quadratus lumborum block vs. intrathecal morphine for postoperative analgesia after cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, FTanta University Faculty of Medicine, Tanta, Egypt.

出版信息

Korean J Anesthesiol. 2020 Apr;73(2):121-128. doi: 10.4097/kja.d.18.00269. Epub 2019 Mar 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adequate pain control after cesarean section (CS) is crucial for mothers caring for newborns, and early ambulation to avoid thromboembolism and chronic abdominal and pelvic pain. This randomized controlled trial compared the efficacy of quadratus lumborum block (QLB) and intrathecal morphine (ITM) for analgesia after CS.

METHODS

Ninety women at ≥ 37 weeks pregnancy scheduled for elective CS were enrolled. All patients received spinal anesthesia and post-operative QLB. They were randomly allocated to Control (anesthesia: 0.1 ml saline, QLB: 24 ml saline), ITM (anesthesia: 0.1 mg morphine, QLB: 24 ml saline), or QLB groups (anesthesia: 0.1 ml saline, QLB: 24 ml 0.375% ropivacaine). Integrated analgesia score (IAS) and numerical rating scale (NRS) scores at rest and during movement, morphine requirements in the first 48 h, time to first morphine dose, and morphine-related side effects were recorded.

RESULTS

IASs and NRS scores at rest and during movement were significantly lower in QLB and ITM group than in Control group. Moreover, IASs and NRS scores at rest and during movement were lower in QLB group than in ITM group. Time to first morphine dose was significantly longer in QLB group than in ITM and Control group. Furthermore, morphine requirements in the first 48 h were significantly lower in QLB group than ITM and Control group. Incidence of morphine-related side effects was significantly higher in ITM group than in QLB and Control group.

CONCLUSIONS

QLB and ITM are effective analgesic regimens after CS. However, QLB provides better long-lasting analgesia and reduced total postoperative morphine consumption.

摘要

背景

剖宫产(CS)后充分的疼痛控制对照顾新生儿的母亲至关重要,早期活动可避免血栓栓塞和慢性腹部和骨盆疼痛。本随机对照试验比较了竖脊肌阻滞(QLB)和鞘内吗啡(ITM)在 CS 后镇痛的疗效。

方法

共纳入 90 名≥37 周妊娠的择期 CS 患者。所有患者均接受脊髓麻醉和术后 QLB。他们被随机分配到对照组(麻醉:0.1ml 生理盐水,QLB:24ml 生理盐水)、ITM 组(麻醉:0.1mg 吗啡,QLB:24ml 生理盐水)或 QLB 组(麻醉:0.1ml 生理盐水,QLB:24ml 0.375%罗哌卡因)。记录综合镇痛评分(IAS)和静息及运动时的数字评分量表(NRS)评分、术后 48 小时内吗啡需求、首次吗啡剂量时间以及吗啡相关不良反应。

结果

QLB 和 ITM 组的 IAS 和 NRS 评分在静息和运动时均显著低于对照组。此外,QLB 组的 IAS 和 NRS 评分在静息和运动时均低于 ITM 组。QLB 组首次吗啡剂量时间明显长于 ITM 和对照组。此外,QLB 组术后 48 小时内吗啡需求量明显低于 ITM 和对照组。ITM 组吗啡相关不良反应发生率明显高于 QLB 和对照组。

结论

QLB 和 ITM 是 CS 后有效的镇痛方案。然而,QLB 提供了更好的长效镇痛效果,减少了术后吗啡总用量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15be/7113160/e03e08ee9c67/kja-d-18-00269f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验