Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy , University of Coimbra , 3000-548 Coimbra , Portugal.
CIEPQPF Centre for Chemical Processes Engineering and Forest Products , University of Coimbra , 3030-790 Coimbra , Portugal.
J Med Chem. 2019 Apr 11;62(7):3636-3657. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b00157. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
C-6α and C-7α androstanes were studied to disclose which position among them is more convenient to functionalize to reach superior aromatase inhibition. In the first series, the study of C-6 versus C-7 methyl derivatives led to the very active compound 9 with IC of 0.06 μM and K = 0.025 μM (competitive inhibition). In the second series, the study of C-6 versus C-7 allyl derivatives led to the best aromatase inhibitor 13 of this work with IC of 0.055 μM and K = 0.0225 μM (irreversible inhibition). Beyond these findings, it was concluded that position C-6α is better to functionalize than C-7α, except when there is a C-4 substituent simultaneously. In addition, the methyl group was the best substituent, followed by the allyl group and next by the hydroxyl group. To rationalize the structure-activity relationship of the best inhibitor 13, molecular modeling studies were carried out.
研究了 C-6α 和 C-7α 雄烷,以揭示其中哪个位置更便于功能化以达到更好的芳香酶抑制作用。在第一个系列中,对 C-6 与 C-7 甲基衍生物的研究导致了非常活跃的化合物 9,其 IC 为 0.06 μM,K = 0.025 μM(竞争性抑制)。在第二个系列中,对 C-6 与 C-7 烯丙基衍生物的研究导致了这项工作中最好的芳香酶抑制剂 13,其 IC 为 0.055 μM,K = 0.0225 μM(不可逆抑制)。除了这些发现,还得出结论,C-6α 位比 C-7α 位更适合功能化,除非同时存在 C-4 取代基。此外,甲基是最好的取代基,其次是烯丙基,其次是羟基。为了合理化最佳抑制剂 13 的构效关系,进行了分子建模研究。