• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会因素、性别与冠状动脉旁路移植术后的死亡率风险:一项基于人群的队列研究。

Social Factors, Sex, and Mortality Risk After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

机构信息

1 Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine Sahlgrenska Academy Gothenburg University Gothenburg Sweden.

2 Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery Sahlgrenska University Hospital Gothenburg Sweden.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Mar 19;8(6):e011490. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011490.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.118.011490
PMID:30852925
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6475039/
Abstract

Background Little is known of the impact of social factors on mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting ( CABG ). We explored sex- and age-specific associations between mortality risk after CABG and marital status, income, and education. Methods and Results This population-based register study included 110 742 CABG patients (21.3% women) from the SWEDEHEART registry (Swedish Web-system for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-based Care in Heart Disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies) operated 1992 to 2015. Cox regression models were used to study the relation between social factors and all-cause mortality. Never having been married compared with being married/cohabiting was associated with a higher risk in women than in men (hazard ratio 1.32, 95% CI 1.20-1.44) versus 1.17 (1.13-1.22), P=0.030 between sex. The lowest income quintile, compared with the highest, was associated with higher risk in men than in women (hazard ratio 1.44 [1.38-1.51] versus 1.25 [1.14-1.38], P=0.0036). Lowest education level was associated with higher risk without sex difference (hazard ratio 1.15 [1.11-1.19] versus 1.25 [1.16-1.35], P=0.75). For unmarried women aged 60 years at surgery with low income and low education, mortality 10 years after surgery was 18%, compared with 11% in married women with high income and higher education level. The median life expectancy was 4.8 years shorter. Corresponding figures for 60-year-old men were 21% versus 12% mortality risk at 10 years and 5.0 years shorter life expectancy. Conclusions There are strong associations between social factors and mortality risk after CABG in both men and women. These results emphasize the importance of developing and implementing secondary prevention strategies for CABG patients with disadvantages in social factors.

摘要

背景

对于冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)后死亡率的影响,社会因素知之甚少。我们探讨了 CABG 后死亡率与婚姻状况、收入和教育程度之间的性别和年龄特异性关联。

方法和结果

本项基于人群的登记研究纳入了 1992 年至 2015 年期间来自 SWEDEHEART 登记处(瑞典基于证据的心脏病治疗增强和开发网络系统)的 110742 名 CABG 患者(21.3%为女性)。Cox 回归模型用于研究社会因素与全因死亡率之间的关系。与已婚/同居相比,从未结婚的女性的风险高于男性(危险比 1.32,95%CI 1.20-1.44),而男性的风险比为 1.17(1.13-1.22),性别之间存在差异(P=0.030)。与收入最高的五分位数相比,收入最低的五分位数与男性的风险增加相关,而与女性的风险增加相关(危险比 1.44[1.38-1.51]与 1.25[1.14-1.38],P=0.0036)。低教育水平与无性别差异的高风险相关(危险比 1.15[1.11-1.19]与 1.25[1.16-1.35],P=0.75)。对于手术时年龄为 60 岁的未婚女性,收入低且教育程度低,手术后 10 年的死亡率为 18%,而收入高且教育程度高的已婚女性为 11%。中位预期寿命缩短了 4.8 年。对于 60 岁的男性,10 年的死亡率风险分别为 21%和 12%,预期寿命缩短 5.0 年。

结论

在男性和女性中,社会因素与 CABG 后死亡率之间存在很强的关联。这些结果强调了为 CABG 患者制定和实施二级预防策略的重要性,这些患者在社会因素方面处于劣势。

相似文献

1
Social Factors, Sex, and Mortality Risk After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Population-Based Cohort Study.社会因素、性别与冠状动脉旁路移植术后的死亡率风险:一项基于人群的队列研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Mar 19;8(6):e011490. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011490.
2
Socioeconomic Factors, Secondary Prevention Medication, and Long-Term Survival After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Population-Based Cohort Study From the SWEDEHEART Registry.社会经济因素、二级预防药物治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术后的长期生存:来自 SWEDEHEART 注册登记研究的一项基于人群的队列研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Mar 3;9(5):e015491. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.015491. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
3
Does a similar procedure result in similar survival for women and men undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting?对于单独接受冠状动脉旁路移植术的女性和男性,类似的手术程序是否会产生类似的生存结果?
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Mar;153(3):571-579.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.11.033. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
4
Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Women 50 Years or Younger.50 岁及以下女性的冠状动脉旁路移植术。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Sep 17;8(18):e013211. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013211. Epub 2019 Sep 14.
5
Relation of major depression to survival after coronary artery bypass grafting.重度抑郁症与冠状动脉搭桥术后生存率的关系。
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Sep 1;114(5):698-703. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.05.058. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
6
Thirty-Year Mortality After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Danish Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.冠状动脉搭桥手术后的三十年死亡率:一项基于丹麦全国人口的队列研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017 May;10(5):e002708. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.002708.
7
Sex-Based Outcomes After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.性别对冠状动脉旁路移植术后结果的影响。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Dec;112(6):1974-1981. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.01.014. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
8
Is sex a risk factor for death in patients with bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts?性别是否是双侧内乳动脉移植患者死亡的一个风险因素?
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Nov;158(5):1345-1353.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.01.025. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
9
Coronary artery bypass grafting in patients 50 years or younger: a Swedish nationwide cohort study.50 岁及以下患者行冠状动脉旁路移植术:一项瑞典全国队列研究。
Circulation. 2015 May 19;131(20):1748-54. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014335. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
10
Comparison of 3-Year Outcomes for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery and Drug-Eluting Stents: Does Sex Matter?冠状动脉搭桥手术与药物洗脱支架的3年疗效比较:性别有影响吗?
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Dec;100(6):2227-36. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.05.103. Epub 2015 Aug 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Marital status, educational level, and mid-term mortality risk in 5924 patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.5924例经导管主动脉瓣植入术后患者的婚姻状况、教育水平与中期死亡风险
Eur Heart J Open. 2024 Sep 12;4(5):oeae077. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeae077. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Predictors of Premature Mortality Following Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: An Iranian Single-Centre Study.冠状动脉搭桥术后过早死亡的预测因素:一项伊朗单中心研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Dec 23;12(1):36. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12010036.
3
Socioeconomic factors and long-term mortality risk after surgical aortic valve replacement.

本文引用的文献

1
Marital status and risk of cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.婚姻状况与心血管疾病风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Heart. 2018 Dec;104(23):1937-1948. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313005. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
2
Socioeconomic Status and Cardiovascular Outcomes: Challenges and Interventions.社会经济地位与心血管结局:挑战与干预。
Circulation. 2018 May 15;137(20):2166-2178. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029652.
3
Explaining trends in coronary heart disease mortality in different socioeconomic groups in Denmark 1991-2007 using the IMPACTSEC model.
社会经济因素与主动脉瓣置换术后的长期死亡风险
Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev. 2023 Nov 8;19:200223. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcrp.2023.200223. eCollection 2023 Dec.
4
Predictors of Psychological Distress among Post-Operative Cardiac Patients: A Narrative Review.心脏术后患者心理困扰的预测因素:一项叙述性综述。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Oct 12;11(20):2721. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11202721.
5
Central Oxygen Venous Saturation and Mortality in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的中心静脉血氧饱和度与死亡率
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2023 Jun 3;19:447-454. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S407454. eCollection 2023.
6
Impact of Psychosocial Risk Factors on Outcomes of Atrial Fibrillation Patients undergoing Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Device Implantation.心理社会危险因素对接受左心耳封堵装置植入术的心房颤动患者结局的影响。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2023 Dec;66(9):2031-2040. doi: 10.1007/s10840-023-01546-4. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
7
Socioeconomic Factors and their Impact on Access and Use of Coronary and Structural Interventions.社会经济因素及其对冠状动脉和结构性干预措施的可及性与使用的影响。
Eur Cardiol. 2022 Oct 27;17:e19. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2022.23. eCollection 2022 Feb.
8
Risk of depression after coronary artery bypass grafting: a SWEDEHEART population-based cohort study.冠状动脉搭桥术后抑郁风险:一项基于瑞典心脏注册数据库人群的队列研究。
Eur Heart J Open. 2022 Mar 2;2(2):oeac015. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeac015. eCollection 2022 Mar.
9
Sex differences in care complexity and cost of cardiac-related procedures as a basis for improving hospital payments systems.基于改善医院支付系统的考虑,对心脏相关手术的护理复杂性和成本的性别差异进行分析。
Eur J Health Econ. 2023 Jun;24(4):539-556. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01496-0. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
10
Psychological Preparation for Cardiac Surgery.心脏手术的心理准备。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2020 Oct 10;22(12):172. doi: 10.1007/s11886-020-01424-9.
利用 IMPACTSEC 模型解释丹麦 1991-2007 年不同社会经济群体中心血管疾病死亡率的变化趋势。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 19;13(4):e0194793. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194793. eCollection 2018.
4
Validity of the Swedish Cardiac Surgery Registry.瑞典心脏外科手术登记处的有效性。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2018 Jul 1;27(1):67-74. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivy030.
5
The Relationship Between Education and Health: Reducing Disparities Through a Contextual Approach.教育与健康的关系:通过情境方法减少差异。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2018 Apr 1;39:273-289. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044628. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
6
2017 EACTS Guidelines on perioperative medication in adult cardiac surgery.2017年欧洲心胸外科学会成人心脏手术围手术期用药指南。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Jan 1;53(1):5-33. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx314.
7
The Swedish cause of death register.瑞典死亡原因登记册。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2017 Sep;32(9):765-773. doi: 10.1007/s10654-017-0316-1. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
8
Educational attainment and differences in relative survival after acute myocardial infarction in Norway: a registry-based population study.挪威急性心肌梗死后的教育程度与相对生存率差异:一项基于登记处的人群研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 28;7(8):e014787. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014787.
9
Trends in mortality risks among 94,328 patients surviving 30days after a first isolated coronary artery bypass graft procedure from 1987 to 2006: A population-based study.1987 年至 2006 年间首次孤立性冠状动脉旁路移植术后 30 天存活的 94328 例患者的死亡率趋势:一项基于人群的研究。
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Oct 1;244:316-321. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.05.013.
10
Impact of marital status and comorbid disorders on health-related quality of life after cardiac surgery.婚姻状况和共病对心脏手术后健康相关生活质量的影响。
Qual Life Res. 2017 Sep;26(9):2421-2434. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1589-2. Epub 2017 May 8.