Suppr超能文献

[无可用内容]。

[Not Available].

作者信息

Bobylev A A, Rachina S A, Avdeev S N, Kozlov R S, Mladov V V

机构信息

Smolensk State Medical University..

出版信息

Kardiologiia. 2019 Mar 7;59(2S):40-46. doi: 10.18087/cardio.2661.

Abstract

AIM

To prove that diagnostic algorithm based on additional measurement of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) for administration of systemic antibacterial therapy (ABT) to patients with suspected community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and concomitant chronic heart failure (CHF) does not influence outcomes of disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This open, single-center, randomized, prospective, noninferiority study included 160 adult patients with documented functional class II-IV CHF who had been admitted with a preliminary diagnosis of non-severe CAP. Patients were randomized at 1:1 to two groups; group 1 - with additional measurement of CRP (n=80) and group 2 - with the use of routine diagnostic methods (n=80). In group 1, systemic ABT was administered only when serum CRP was >28.5 mg / l (threshold level of the biomarker calculated at the previous stage of the study); group 2 received a standard treatment. Noninferiority test result for both algorithms was evaluated by the number of patients with clinical success on days 12-14 (primary endpoint). Non-inferiority margin was δ=-13.5 %. In addition secondary endpoints (early clinical response on days 3-5; early in-hospital adverse events (development of complications; admission to intensive care unit (ICU); death), death, recurrent CAP or CHF worsening with readmission at 28 day; mortality at 90 and 180 days) were estimated. Standard statistical tools were used for all intergroup comparisons.

RESULTS

76 patients of each group reached the primary endpoint. Systemic ABT was administered to 51 (67.1 %) patients in group 1 and 76 (100 %) patients in group 2 (p<0.05). Both groups were comparable (p>0.05) regarding all endpoints: clinical success, 70 (92.1 %) vs. 69 (90.8 %), Δ=1.3 % (one-sided 97.5 % CI: - 8.25 % for non-inferiority margin δ=-13.5 %); early clinical response, 66 (86.8 %) vs. 68 (89.5 %); admission to ICU, 1 (1.3 %) vs. 1 (1.3 %); development of complications, 20 (26.3 %) vs. 22 (28.9 %); readmission, 5 (6.6 %) vs. 6 (7.9 %); in-hospital mortality, 2 (2.6 %) vs. 1 (1.3 %), mortality at 28 day, 3 (3.9 %) vs. 2 (2.6 %), at 90 day, 5 (6.6 %) vs. 4 (5.3 %), at 180 day, 8 (10.5 %) vs. 9 (11.8 %) cases, respectively.

CONCLUSION

additional measurement of serum CRP in patients with CHF and suspected non-severe CAP was able to reduce rate of systemic ABT administration without outcomes and prognosis worsening.

摘要

目的

证明基于额外检测血清C反应蛋白(CRP)的诊断算法用于疑似社区获得性肺炎(CAP)合并慢性心力衰竭(CHF)患者的全身抗菌治疗(ABT),不会影响疾病的转归。

材料与方法

这项开放、单中心、随机、前瞻性、非劣效性研究纳入了160例有II-IV级CHF功能分级记录且初步诊断为非重症CAP的成年患者。患者按1:1随机分为两组;第1组 - 额外检测CRP(n = 80),第2组 - 使用常规诊断方法(n = 80)。在第1组中,仅当血清CRP>28.5 mg / l(该生物标志物的阈值水平是在研究的前一阶段计算得出)时才给予全身ABT;第2组接受标准治疗。通过第12 - 14天临床成功的患者数量(主要终点)评估两种算法的非劣效性测试结果。非劣效性界值为δ=-13.5%。此外,还评估了次要终点(第3 - 5天的早期临床反应;早期院内不良事件(并发症的发生;入住重症监护病房(ICU);死亡)、死亡、28天再入院时复发性CAP或CHF恶化;90天和180天的死亡率)。所有组间比较均使用标准统计工具。

结果

每组76例患者达到主要终点。第1组51例(67.1%)患者接受了全身ABT,第2组76例(100%)患者接受了全身ABT(p<0.05)。两组在所有终点方面具有可比性(p>0.05):临床成功,70例(92.1%)对69例(90.8%),Δ=1.3%(单侧97.5%CI:对于非劣效性界值δ=-13.5%为 - 8.25%);早期临床反应,66例(86.8%)对68例(89.5%);入住ICU,1例(1.3%)对1例(1.3%);并发症的发生,20例(26.3%)对22例(28.9%);再入院,5例(6.6%)对6例(7.9%);院内死亡率,2例(2.6%)对1例(1.3%),28天死亡率,3例(3.9%)对2例(2.6%),90天死亡率,5例(6.6%)对4例(5.3%),180天死亡率,8例(10.5%)对9例(11.8%)。

结论

对CHF合并疑似非重症CAP患者额外检测血清CRP能够降低全身ABT的给药率,且不使转归和预后恶化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验