Suppr超能文献

一种使用宿主生物标志物即时检验来管理坦桑尼亚儿童发热性疾病的新型电子算法(e-POCT):一项随机对照非劣效性试验。

A novel electronic algorithm using host biomarker point-of-care tests for the management of febrile illnesses in Tanzanian children (e-POCT): A randomized, controlled non-inferiority trial.

作者信息

Keitel Kristina, Kagoro Frank, Samaka Josephine, Masimba John, Said Zamzam, Temba Hosiana, Mlaganile Tarsis, Sangu Willy, Rambaud-Althaus Clotilde, Gervaix Alain, Genton Blaise, D'Acremont Valérie

机构信息

Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.

University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

PLoS Med. 2017 Oct 23;14(10):e1002411. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002411. eCollection 2017 Oct.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The management of childhood infections remains inadequate in resource-limited countries, resulting in high mortality and irrational use of antimicrobials. Current disease management tools, such as the Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) algorithm, rely solely on clinical signs and have not made use of available point-of-care tests (POCTs) that can help to identify children with severe infections and children in need of antibiotic treatment. e-POCT is a novel electronic algorithm based on current evidence; it guides clinicians through the entire consultation and recommends treatment based on a few clinical signs and POCT results, some performed in all patients (malaria rapid diagnostic test, hemoglobin, oximeter) and others in selected subgroups only (C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, glucometer). The objective of this trial was to determine whether the clinical outcome of febrile children managed by the e-POCT tool was non-inferior to that of febrile children managed by a validated electronic algorithm derived from IMCI (ALMANACH), while reducing the proportion with antibiotic prescription.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We performed a randomized (at patient level, blocks of 4), controlled non-inferiority study among children aged 2-59 months presenting with acute febrile illness to 9 outpatient clinics in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. In parallel, routine care was documented in 2 health centers. The primary outcome was the proportion of clinical failures (development of severe symptoms, clinical pneumonia on/after day 3, or persistent symptoms at day 7) by day 7 of follow-up. Non-inferiority would be declared if the proportion of clinical failures with e-POCT was no worse than the proportion of clinical failures with ALMANACH, within statistical variability, by a margin of 3%. The secondary outcomes included the proportion with antibiotics prescribed on day 0, primary referrals, and severe adverse events by day 30 (secondary hospitalizations and deaths). We enrolled 3,192 patients between December 2014 and February 2016 into the randomized study; 3,169 patients (e-POCT: 1,586; control [ALMANACH]: 1,583) completed the intervention and day 7 follow-up. Using e-POCT, in the per-protocol population, the absolute proportion of clinical failures was 2.3% (37/1,586), as compared with 4.1% (65/1,583) in the ALMANACH arm (risk difference of clinical failure -1.7, 95% CI -3.0, -0.5), meeting the prespecified criterion for non-inferiority. In a non-prespecified superiority analysis, we observed a 43% reduction in the relative risk of clinical failure when using e-POCT compared to ALMANACH (risk ratio [RR] 0.57, 95% CI 0.38, 0.85, p = 0.005). The proportion of severe adverse events was 0.6% in the e-POCT arm compared with 1.5% in the ALMANACH arm (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.20, 0.87, p = 0.02). The proportion of antibiotic prescriptions was substantially lower, 11.5% compared to 29.7% (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.33, 0.45, p < 0.001). Using e-POCT, the most common indication for antibiotic prescription was severe disease (57%, 103/182 prescriptions), while it was non-severe respiratory infections using the control algorithm (ALMANACH) (70%, 330/470 prescriptions). The proportion of clinical failures among the 544 children in the routine care cohort was 4.6% (25/544); 94.9% (516/544) of patients received antibiotics on day 0, and 1.1% (6/544) experienced severe adverse events. e-POCT achieved a 49% reduction in the relative risk of clinical failure compared to routine care (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.31, 0.84, p = 0.007) and lowered antibiotic prescriptions to 11.5% from 94.9% (p < 0.001). Though this safety study was an important first step to evaluate e-POCT, its true utility should be evaluated through future implementation studies since adherence to the algorithm will be an important factor in making use of e-POCT's advantages in terms of clinical outcome and antibiotic prescription.

CONCLUSIONS

e-POCT, an innovative electronic algorithm using host biomarker POCTs, including C-reactive protein and procalcitonin, has the potential to improve the clinical outcome of children with febrile illnesses while reducing antibiotic use through improved identification of children with severe infections, and better targeting of children in need of antibiotic prescription.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02225769.

摘要

背景

在资源有限的国家,儿童感染的管理仍然不足,导致高死亡率和抗菌药物的不合理使用。当前的疾病管理工具,如儿童疾病综合管理(IMCI)算法,仅依赖临床体征,尚未利用现有的即时检验(POCT),而这些检验有助于识别重症感染儿童和需要抗生素治疗的儿童。电子POCT是一种基于现有证据的新型电子算法;它在整个会诊过程中指导临床医生,并根据一些临床体征和POCT结果推荐治疗方案,其中一些检查适用于所有患者(疟疾快速诊断检测、血红蛋白、血氧仪),其他检查仅适用于特定亚组(C反应蛋白、降钙素原、血糖仪)。本试验的目的是确定使用电子POCT工具管理的发热儿童的临床结局是否不劣于使用源自IMCI的经过验证的电子算法(ALMANACH)管理的发热儿童,同时减少抗生素处方比例。

方法和结果

我们在坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆的9个门诊诊所对2至59个月患有急性发热疾病的儿童进行了一项随机(患者层面,每组4例)、对照非劣效性研究。同时,在2个卫生中心记录常规护理情况。主要结局是随访第7天时临床失败(出现严重症状、第3天及以后发生临床肺炎或第7天持续有症状)的比例。如果电子POCT组临床失败的比例在统计变异性范围内不超过ALMANACH组临床失败比例3%,则判定为非劣效。次要结局包括第0天开具抗生素的比例、首次转诊以及第30天时的严重不良事件(再次住院和死亡)。2014年12月至2016年2月,我们将3192例患者纳入随机研究;3169例患者(电子POCT组:1586例;对照组[ALMANACH]:1583例)完成了干预和第7天的随访。在符合方案人群中,使用电子POCT时临床失败的绝对比例为2.3%(37/1586),而ALMANACH组为4.1%(65/1583)(临床失败风险差异为-1.7,95%CI -3.0,-0.5),符合预先设定的非劣效标准。在一项未预先设定的优效性分析中,我们观察到与ALMANACH相比,使用电子POCT时临床失败的相对风险降低了43%(风险比[RR] 0.57,95%CI 0.38,0.85,p = 0.005)。电子POCT组严重不良事件的比例为0.6%,而ALMANACH组为1.5%(RR 0.42,95%CI 0.20,0.87,p = 0.02)。抗生素处方比例显著降低,分别为11.5%和29.7%(RR 0.39,95%CI 0.33,0.45,p < 0.001)。使用电子POCT时,抗生素处方最常见的指征是重症疾病(57%,103/182例处方),而使用对照算法(ALMANACH)时是非重症呼吸道感染(70%,330/470例处方)。常规护理队列中544例儿童的临床失败比例为4.6%(25/544);94.9%(516/544)的患者在第0天接受了抗生素治疗,1.1%(6/544)发生了严重不良事件。与常规护理相比,电子POCT使临床失败的相对风险降低了49%(RR 0.51,95%CI 0.31,0.84,p = 0.007),并将抗生素处方率从94.9%降至11.5%(p < 0.001)。尽管这项安全性研究是评估电子POCT的重要第一步,但其真正效用应通过未来实施研究进行评估,因为遵循该算法将是利用电子POCT在临床结局和抗生素处方方面优势的重要因素。

结论

电子POCT是一种创新的电子算法,使用包括C反应蛋白和降钙素原在内的宿主生物标志物POCT,有可能改善发热疾病儿童的临床结局,同时通过更好地识别重症感染儿童和更精准地针对需要抗生素处方的儿童来减少抗生素使用。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02225769

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验