College of Health Sciences, Midwestern University, 19555 N. 59th Ave., Glendale, AZ 85308, USA; The Geneva Foundation for Military Medical Research, 917 Pacific Ave. Suite 600, Tacoma, WA 98402, USA; Kellogg College, University of Oxford, 60 Banbury Road, Oxford, OX2 6PN, UK.
The Geneva Foundation for Military Medical Research, 917 Pacific Ave. Suite 600, Tacoma, WA 98402, USA; United States Army Medical Department Center and School, Northeastern University, 3490 Forage Rd. Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234, USA.
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Nov;37(11):2043-2050. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.02.035. Epub 2019 Feb 23.
Limited prospective data exist regarding epinephrine's controversial role in managing traumatic cardiac arrest (TCA). This study compared the maximum concentration (Cmax), time to maximum concentration (Tmax), plasma concentration over time, return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), time to ROSC, and odds of ROSC of epinephrine administered by the endotracheal (ETT), intraosseous (IO), and intravenous (IV) routes in a swine TCA model.
Forty-nine Yorkshire-cross swine were assigned to seven groups: ETT, tibial IO (TIO), sternal IO (SIO), humeral IO (HIO), IV, CPR with defibrillation (CPRD), and CPR only. Swine were exsanguinated 31% of their blood volume and cardiac arrest induced. Chest compressions began 2 min post-arrest. At 4 min post-arrest, 1 mg epinephrine was administered, and blood specimens collected over 4 min. Resuscitation continued until ROSC or 30 min elapsed.
The Cmax of IV epinephrine was significantly higher than the TIO group (P = 0.049). No other differences in Cmax, Tmax, ROSC, and time to ROSC existed between the epinephrine groups (P > 0.05). Epinephrine levels were detectable in two of seven ETT swine. No significant difference in ROSC existed between the epinephrine groups and CPRD group (P > 0.05). Significant differences in ROSC existed between all groups and the CPR only group (P < 0.05). No significant differences in odds of ROSC were noted.
The pharmacokinetics of IV, HIO, and SIO epinephrine were comparable. Endotracheal epinephrine absorption was highly variable and unreliable compared to IV and IO epinephrine. Epinephrine appeared to have a lesser role than volume replacement in resuscitating TCA.
关于肾上腺素在创伤性心脏骤停(TCA)中的有争议作用,目前仅有有限的前瞻性数据。本研究比较了气管内(ETT)、骨内(IO)和静脉内(IV)途径给予肾上腺素后,肾上腺素的最大浓度(Cmax)、达到最大浓度的时间(Tmax)、随时间的血浆浓度、自主循环恢复(ROSC)、ROSC 时间和 ROSC 几率在猪 TCA 模型中的作用。
将 49 头约克夏杂交猪分为 7 组:ETT、胫骨 IO(TIO)、胸骨 IO(SIO)、肱骨 IO(HIO)、IV、带除颤的心肺复苏(CPRD)和仅心肺复苏(CPR)。猪放血 31%的血容量,诱导心脏骤停。心脏骤停后 2 分钟开始进行胸外按压。心脏骤停后 4 分钟,给予 1mg 肾上腺素,并在 4 分钟内采集血样。复苏继续进行,直到 ROSC 或 30 分钟结束。
IV 肾上腺素的 Cmax 明显高于 TIO 组(P=0.049)。在肾上腺素组之间,Cmax、Tmax、ROSC 和 ROSC 时间没有其他差异(P>0.05)。在 7 头 ETT 猪中有 2 头检测到肾上腺素水平。肾上腺素组与 CPRD 组的 ROSC 无显著差异(P>0.05)。所有组与仅 CPR 组之间的 ROSC 存在显著差异(P<0.05)。ROSC 的几率没有显著差异。
IV、HIO 和 SIO 肾上腺素的药代动力学相似。与 IV 和 IO 肾上腺素相比,气管内肾上腺素的吸收具有高度的可变性和不可靠性。肾上腺素在 TCA 复苏中的作用似乎比容量替代小。