Department of Radiation Oncology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Jul 1;104(3):622-630. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.02.056. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
There is limited long-term data on outcome and side effects of Cs-131 prostate brachytherapy and minimal patient-reported data on rectal bleeding with any isotope. We aimed to describe the incidence, prevalence, and predictors of late patient-reported rectal bleeding after Cs-131 brachytherapy.
We reviewed a prospectively collected database of 620 men treated with Cs-131 prostate brachytherapy. Of 620 patients, 390 (62.9%) received brachytherapy as monotherapy; the remainder received combination therapy with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Patients were administered Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite questionnaires preoperatively and postoperatively at each follow-up visit. The primary outcome was late rectal bleeding, defined as rectal bleeding reported at the 6-month follow-up or later. Clinically significant rectal bleeding was defined as occurring more than "rarely," and clinically significant bother from rectal bleeding was defined as considering bleeding more than a "very small problem." Univariate and multivariate Cox regression were performed to identify factors predictive for rectal bleeding.
With a median follow-up time of 48 months, the cumulative incidence of clinically significant late rectal bleeding was 12.4%, with 15.2% reporting clinically significant bother from bleeding. At the time of last follow-up, the prevalence of clinically significant rectal bleeding and bother were 4.0% and 4.7%, respectively. On univariate analysis, acute clinically significant rectal bleeding, defined as occurring within the first 6 months (P = .001) and combination therapy with EBRT (P = .001) predicted for clinically significant late rectal bleeding. On multivariate analysis, both EBRT (P = .001; hazard ratio, 2.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.58-3.94) and acute rectal bleeding (P < .001; hazard ratio, 3.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.75-5.53) remained significant predictors for late rectal bleeding.
Prostate brachytherapy with Cs-131 is well tolerated in the long term. Although the incidence of clinically significant patient-reported late rectal bleeding was 12.4%, the prevalence at last follow-up was only 4.0%, suggesting that this problem tends to resolve.
关于 Cs-131 前列腺近距离放射治疗的长期结果和副作用的数据有限,而且对于任何放射性同位素的直肠出血,患者报告的数据很少。我们旨在描述 Cs-131 放射性治疗后晚期患者报告直肠出血的发生率、流行率和预测因素。
我们回顾了 620 例接受 Cs-131 前列腺近距离放射治疗的前瞻性数据库。在 620 例患者中,390 例(62.9%)接受单纯放射性治疗;其余患者接受外照射放射治疗(EBRT)联合治疗。患者在术前和每次随访时接受前列腺癌综合指数复合问卷(Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite,EPIC)调查。主要结果是晚期直肠出血,定义为在 6 个月随访时或之后报告的直肠出血。临床显著的直肠出血定义为发生频率多于“罕见”,而因直肠出血感到明显困扰的定义为认为出血是“非常小的问题”。进行单变量和多变量 Cox 回归以确定预测直肠出血的因素。
中位随访时间为 48 个月,临床显著晚期直肠出血的累积发生率为 12.4%,15.2%报告因出血而感到明显困扰。在最后一次随访时,临床显著直肠出血和困扰的发生率分别为 4.0%和 4.7%。单变量分析显示,6 个月内发生的急性临床显著直肠出血(P=0.001)和 EBRT 联合治疗(P=0.001)可预测晚期临床显著直肠出血。多变量分析显示,EBRT(P=0.001;危险比,2.50;95%置信区间,1.58-3.94)和急性直肠出血(P<0.001;危险比,3.11;95%置信区间,1.75-5.53)均为晚期直肠出血的显著预测因素。
用 Cs-131 进行前列腺近距离放射治疗在长期内具有良好的耐受性。尽管有 12.4%的患者报告出现临床显著的晚期直肠出血,但在最后一次随访时的发生率仅为 4.0%,这表明该问题往往会得到解决。