Montilla-García Ángeles, Tejada Miguel Á, Ruiz-Cantero M Carmen, Bravo-Caparrós Inmaculada, Yeste Sandra, Zamanillo Daniel, Cobos Enrique J
Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Institute of Neuroscience, The Biomedical Research Centre, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Feb 22;10:136. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00136. eCollection 2019.
Sigma-1 receptor antagonism increases the effects of morphine on nociceptive pain, even in morphine-tolerant animals. However, it is unknown whether these receptors are able to modulate morphine antinociception and tolerance during inflammatory pain. Here we used a mouse model to test the modulation of morphine effects by the selective sigma-1 antagonist S1RA (MR309), by determining its effect on inflammatory tactile allodynia (von Frey filaments) and on grip strength deficits induced by joint inflammation (a measure of pain-induced functional disability), and compared the results with those for nociceptive heat pain recorded with the unilateral hot plate (55°C) test. The subcutaneous (s.c.) administration of morphine induced antinociceptive effects to heat stimuli, and restored mechanical threshold and grip strength in mice with periarticular inflammation induced by Complete Freund's Adjuvant. S1RA (80 mg/kg, s.c.) administered alone did not induce any effect on nociceptive heat pain or inflammatory allodynia, but was able to partially reverse grip strength deficits. The association of S1RA with morphine, at doses inducing little or no analgesic-like effects when administered alone, resulted in a marked antinociceptive effect to heat stimuli and complete reversion of inflammatory tactile allodynia. However, S1RA administration did not increase the effect of morphine on grip strength deficits induced by joint inflammation. When S1RA (80 mg/kg, s.c.) was administered to morphine-tolerant animals, it rescued the analgesic-like effects of this opioid in all three pain measures. However, when S1RA was repeatedly given during the induction of morphine tolerance (and not on the day of behavioral evaluation) it failed to affect tolerance to the effects of morphine on nociceptive heat pain or inflammatory allodynia, but completely preserved the effects of this opioid on grip strength deficits. These effects of S1RA on morphine tolerance cannot be explained by pharmacokinetic interactions, given that the administration of S1RA did not modify concentrations of morphine or morphine-3-glucuronide (a major morphine metabolite) in morphine-tolerant animals in plasma or brain tissue. We conclude that sigma-1 receptors play a pivotal role in the control of morphine analgesia and tolerance in nociceptive and inflammatory pain, although in a manner dependent on the type of painful stimulus explored.
西格玛-1受体拮抗作用会增强吗啡对伤害性疼痛的作用,即使在吗啡耐受的动物中也是如此。然而,尚不清楚这些受体在炎症性疼痛期间是否能够调节吗啡的镇痛作用和耐受性。在这里,我们使用小鼠模型来测试选择性西格玛-1拮抗剂S1RA(MR309)对吗啡作用的调节,通过确定其对炎症性触觉异常性疼痛(von Frey细丝)和关节炎症诱导的握力缺陷(疼痛诱导的功能障碍的一种测量方法)的影响,并将结果与单侧热板(55°C)试验记录的伤害性热痛结果进行比较。皮下(s.c.)注射吗啡可诱导对热刺激的镇痛作用,并恢复完全弗氏佐剂诱导的关节周围炎症小鼠的机械阈值和握力。单独给予S1RA(80mg/kg,s.c.)对伤害性热痛或炎症性异常性疼痛没有任何影响,但能够部分逆转握力缺陷。当单独给药时几乎不产生或不产生类镇痛作用的剂量下,S1RA与吗啡联合使用,会对热刺激产生明显的镇痛作用,并完全逆转炎症性触觉异常性疼痛。然而,给予S1RA并没有增强吗啡对关节炎症诱导的握力缺陷的作用。当给吗啡耐受的动物注射S1RA(80mg/kg,s.c.)时,它在所有三种疼痛测量中挽救了这种阿片类药物的类镇痛作用。然而,当在吗啡耐受诱导期间(而不是在行为评估当天)反复给予S1RA时,它未能影响吗啡对伤害性热痛或炎症性异常性疼痛作用的耐受性,但完全保留了这种阿片类药物对握力缺陷 的作用。鉴于给予SRA不会改变吗啡耐受动物血浆或脑组织中吗啡或吗啡-3-葡萄糖醛酸(一种主要的吗啡代谢物)的浓度,S1RA对吗啡耐受性的这些作用无法用药物动力学相互作用来解释。我们得出结论,西格玛-1受体在伤害性和炎症性疼痛中吗啡镇痛和耐受性的控制中起关键作用,尽管其方式取决于所探究的疼痛刺激类型。