Suppr超能文献

内镜超声用于胃癌术前T分期:准确性及差异分析

Endoscopic ultrasonography for pretreatment T-staging of gastric cancer: An accuracy and discrepancy analysis.

作者信息

Yan Yan, Wu Qi, Li Zi-Yu, Bu Zhao-De, Ji Jia-Fu

机构信息

Endoscopy Center, Beijing Cancer Hospital, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, P.R. China.

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Beijing Cancer Hospital, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, P.R. China.

出版信息

Oncol Lett. 2019 Mar;17(3):2849-2855. doi: 10.3892/ol.2019.9920. Epub 2019 Jan 10.

Abstract

In the current era of multi-disciplinary treatment, precise and detailed diagnosis prior to treatment is crucial for clinical practice. For different lesions that fit different indications, the optimum approach for treatment differs significantly. Thus, the recent 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer classification system has introduced 'clinical stage' as a criterion. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) has been the first-line choice for pretreatment staging; however, there is no standardization of the depth classification nor a standard EUS method. Additionally, the accuracy for this diagnostic test has ranged between <40 and 90% in previous studies. The aim of the present study was to determine the accuracy of EUS, identify the discrepancies between EUS and histological results, and analyze the underlying causes. Between June 2014 and February 2016, EUS was performed on gastric carcinoma specimens from 60 consecutive patients. EUS was performed on the resected specimens following surgery, but prior to fixation in formalin, invasion of the gastric wall was determined and the deepest location was marked with sutures. The ultrasound images were independently interpreted, and the quality of the images was scored by two endoscopists. Subsequently, the ultrasound images were compared with the pathological results of the same section. The overall accuracy of EUS was 75%. For locally advanced gastric cancers, EUS had a relatively high accuracy (33/43, 86%). The EUS results corresponded well with the pathological hematoxylin and eosin staining results, and the deepest points determined by EUS were confirmed by pathology in the majority of cases (85%). In total, 50 and 10 cases were scored as having high/moderate and low quality, associated with accuracies of 86% (43/50) and 20% (2/10), respectively. EUS is valuable for pretreatment T-staging, particularly for advanced cases. Proximal stomach cancer exhibited a tendency for improved accuracy. Overall, the results of the present study suggest that standardized scanning processes, particularly including all-encompassing scanning, proper probe-placement and high image quality, lead to improved accuracy of EUS.

摘要

在当前多学科治疗的时代,治疗前精确而详细的诊断对临床实践至关重要。对于符合不同适应证的不同病变,最佳治疗方法差异显著。因此,美国癌症联合委员会最近的第8版分类系统引入了“临床分期”作为标准。超声内镜检查(EUS)一直是治疗前分期的一线选择;然而,深度分类尚无标准化,也没有标准的EUS方法。此外,在以往研究中,这项诊断检查的准确率在<40%至90%之间。本研究的目的是确定EUS的准确性,识别EUS与组织学结果之间的差异,并分析其潜在原因。2014年6月至2016年2月期间,对60例连续胃癌患者的标本进行了EUS检查。在手术后但未用福尔马林固定之前,对切除的标本进行EUS检查,确定胃壁侵犯情况,并用缝线标记最深位置。超声图像由两名内镜医师独立解读,并对图像质量进行评分。随后,将超声图像与同一切片的病理结果进行比较。EUS的总体准确率为75%。对于局部进展期胃癌,EUS具有相对较高的准确率(33/43,86%)。EUS结果与病理苏木精和伊红染色结果吻合良好,在大多数病例(85%)中,EUS确定的最深点经病理证实。总共50例和10例分别被评为高质量/中等质量和低质量,准确率分别为86%(43/50)和20%(2/10)。EUS对治疗前T分期有价值,特别是对于晚期病例。近端胃癌显示出准确率提高的趋势。总体而言,本研究结果表明,标准化的扫描流程,特别是包括全面扫描、合适的探头放置和高图像质量,可提高EUS的准确性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97b4/6365933/df89f23cc4d1/ol-17-03-2849-g00.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验